Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bush does care about Americans, a little.  Oh and I happen to agree that you will never eradicate terrorism.  There was terrorism around when the bible was being written.  Also, do not doubt how big a pain in the side a popular forum can be to agencies.

Posted

u know those shootings around schools around the world its being cause after the terrorism began also ur friends maight go nuts and start a shooting

i can detect who might cause a school shooting by looking at them i might one day be a terrorist but i want to work at westwood

Posted

hum the topic has changed from nuclear war to terroism. Along the similiar lines, but slightly different. Put the two together and you have one big problem: NUCLEAR TERRORISTS!!! Anyone with a missile and plutonium is considerably dangerous, even with plain plutonium. Now put any device capable of mass destruction in the hands of someone who plans to do something considerably "evil" (like mass genocide), and the results will vary, but still yield things similiar: many people dying for no GOOD reason.

Posted

Damn Bush and his new budget, he's mobilising now how should that be interpret? He doesn't give a damn about the envirement, he think he can fight terrorism with a huge military forc, that president and his advisors are insane.

Posted

he cant fight terrorism he should leave all that work to the students in high schools and some of them want to stop terrorism and some other ppl disagree wit those ppl

and theres others that have been pick on beaten up well they might become terrorists

Posted

School shootings were around before Bush was in office you know, oh and by the way, I hope the CIA really isn't watching this board, because if they are you will probably be terminated.

Posted

Yeah, when President CLinton came to my high school a few years ago a kid said he wished he could hurt him.  THe Secret Service comes a week in advance to scout things out and had the kid under arrest until CLinton was out of the city, and he wasn't even in it yet.

Posted

Well everyones wants to hurt a president in one way or another, right? Whether it be knocking them over the head with a wrench or stepping on their toes, we still want to inflict some sort of bodily harm on them. (like choking on pretzels) Besides that, Bush is a considerable moron (he got elected, which proves that somewhere in that vast emptiness he calls a head, there is a brain) he'd rather fight a war that he can't possibly win than raise two daughters! ( I doubt that this was a joke, though it could be, then again it could be an ecuse to go kill some Arabs). Bsuh follows the path of another pres and that just happens to be his father (and not quite a good example at that).

Posted

I really don't wanna hurt him just send him to a mental intitution where he can have his own room with soft walls, and waiters with long white coats, and maybe if he's lucky he'll get a nice jacket with oversize arms, that's high fashion right now Bush.

Posted

i have been in 1 mental hospital and almost 1 more in another hospital thank god i came out and maybe told them stuff that isnt true im still a gamer but my mind wage wars about whether certain ppl should die when i got to it i just say im to lazy to bomb  my car

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

well Jacob some people don't care, cause they can't be found.

And Fed you are right I heard a radio program on Nixon, he was really close to drop the bomb over Vietnam, also he tried to use CIA to cover up the Watergate scandal.

Posted

Nixon was a failure anyway back to nuclear war Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa released part of a report last Thursday (2-28-02) about nuclear fallout from testing by the US during 1951 to 1962, the year the testing was banned. The report suggests the following

*After 1951 20,000 nonfatal cancers may be linked to fallout from above-ground nuclear test

*Tests in the former Soviet Union and on several Pacific Islands by United States and Britain may have spread more fallout to the US than previous though.

*Tests in Nevada (US) spread substantial amounts of radioactivity across these US states Nevada, Uath, Idaho, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa and Missouri.

*All domestic and foreign tests combined show that no US resident born after 1951 was not exposed. In Iowa, Tennessee, California, Oregon, Washington and Idaho traces of both sources of fallout were heavily found.  

*Information was based apon computer models of variables like weather patterns and population trends, these are the estimates on the radiation dispersal.

Posted

I just heard the news that Bush are prepared to use nuclear weapons in his little crusade in the middle east, that man belongs in mental institution, he's more dangerous than any arabic fundamentalist.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.