ordos45 Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Everyone has a purpose in life. Everyone's existence has meaning.
Andrew Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 I say hold it in the Fed2k channel on MIRC. It will get some use then. Event of the century! $5 advanced tickets $10 at the door.Contact Chanserv for more information.
ordos45 Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 We have to pay to watch Gob and Nav hold a debate?
Acriku Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Nav, of course I wouldn't say that your existence has no purpose as if I think anybody else has purpose in their existence. Oh wait, so I am saying that your existence has no purpose :) But no offense, that's what I think of everybody else. Aside from that, that was not the point of my post. I was blatantly saying that any ray of reason cannot penetrate the wall you've set up yourself.Get this straight, though: I never said I didn't like you. If I did, then it was probably in the heat of the moment, and was not truly meant as it was said. You're a tolerable existence.
Andrew Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 If Gob debates a brick wall then prices may increase.The costs to get a brick wall to communicate on mIRC are astronomical. But the debate will be to the last brick!
TMA_1 Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 doesnt this make anybody laugh? it shows how much of a joke this is for nav. He is either nuts, or purposely posts this stuff just to piss people off, because he posted this post to debate against Gob, and now has used almost half of it to complain about a stalking that doesnt exist...
alchemi2 Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Any infomation place in a public domain becomes public property, therefore any info you place on an unsecure site maybe retransmitted to other sites.Hacking is illegal so thats a toatlly diffrent matter as the info is stolen and was not for public consumption.I was under the impression Nav that you were gonna challenge Gob to a proper debate on an actual topic possibly morality not just have a slanging match over your banning.I thought that swearing was against Fed2k posting rules as is flaming so why don't we curb that and stay around the Topic were possible.So Nav what was the topic you wanted to argue?
EWS Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 If you post your own public information on the net, then you therfore have no claims over it. You are basically telling everyone to view it. What would you do if you posted on a website and then got a phonecall the next day, saying that he found your information on a board and decided to call you for a chat. Would you "sue" him because he got the information of the net? What if he shared it with other people? There is nothing wrong with that as you gave up your right to privacy when you posted it. The only way round this is if the site has decided that no personal information is allowed.
Nyarlathotep Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Well, at least the overal post rate goes up again. Welcome back Nav ;D
Anathema Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Hehe, I wonder when old Nav would come back- welcome ;)side question, do I have your permission to post those IMs in wich you were accusing me of stalking you?
gryphon Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 doesnt this make anybody laugh?I have missed it sinds last night .. but are waiting at work and catching up on my forums .. . this still brings a smile to my fase .. :)
Navaros Posted February 23, 2004 Author Posted February 23, 2004 all you guys who say that information on the Internet belongs to everybody by default:
EWS Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Something in the public domain belongs to the public. FACT!
Navaros Posted February 23, 2004 Author Posted February 23, 2004 Well, at least the overal post rate goes up again. Welcome back Nav ;Dagreed. controversy or not - I have always been "good for business". maybe that's why Gob has not banned me again as of yet. cuz the site is slumping and he knows that i bring the peeps in, in droves. but do i ever get *CREDIT* for being "good for business"? no. the quoted text is probably the only time i've been given the proper credit for that. just another example of how Gob and others here like to mistreat me.
Warskum Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Lol, your good for bussines becz every1 has to laugh becuz of the way you talk, like in this thread you call some1 an stalker.A week ago i had to write something for school and needed info about Bush, so i went to the internet and searched some info, like were he used to live and stuff like that, now tell me am i a stalker :O?You make fun out of urself every time you post and thats why every1 reads ur posts and replies, ur like clown ur good for our entertaiming, but you can also be very anoying wich drives ppl mad and they start flaming you=posts="good for business'
Dante Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Ahh, hello Navaros. Remember me? It's not like we could ever forget you... :)
Navaros Posted February 23, 2004 Author Posted February 23, 2004 And yet, inspite of how evil and mean we all are, you just keep comming back....yup and it's not really for you guys who are evil to me. i've already let my feelings be known about how much i despise Gob in this thread. i am here to help those in need of my insights/wisdom. they are what keeps me here. if i had the power to, you can be 100% sure that i would perm ban Gob for being a corrupt Mod. but since I can't, i have to "make the best of a bad situation" - which is what i'm doing by staying despite the fact that a lot of the people on this site are immoral and without honor.
Dante Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 Both of those terms are subjective and depend on the opinion of the person using them. It is impossible to come up with a definite definition of them so there's not much point in using them. But anyway, if you're here to help people then wouldn't it make more sense to swallow your pride and stick out the "bad situation" to do so? That way there's no disagreement or flames and you can get on with spreading the good word. Of course if you don't do that then you have another agenda besides just altruistically helping people...
GUNWOUNDS Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 If i recall correctly... it wasnt really Gob who banned you ...
Nyarlathotep Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 agreed. controversy or not - I have always been "good for business".
Inoculator9 Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 God is not that biased Gunwounds, for god sake. Just because Mechdragon asked to have him banned around the time Gob was going to, doesn't mean that was Gob siding with Mechdragon. I like to think of Gob as a friend and god knows he doesn't do anything I ask :P
GUNWOUNDS Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 God is not that biased Gunwounds, for god sake. Just because Mechdragon asked to have him banned around the time Gob was going to, doesn't mean that was Gob siding with Mechdragon. I like to think of Gob as a friend and god knows he doesn't do anything I ask :PWell Mechdragon seemed pretty sure of himself and even posted kinda taking credit for it... in other words he made it sound like he was one of the driving forces behind the banning.
Gobalopper Posted February 23, 2004 Posted February 23, 2004 It wasn't Mechadragon who got anyone banned, lots of people complained about both you and Navaros, he was just one of the many. I don't keep a list of why people were banned although I seem to remember Nema getting mad which doesn't happen very often and that tipped the scales... can't remember if that was you or Navaros though.
Recommended Posts