Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

They say, the most the experienced soldiers are always willing to die.

I think that saying is because, the most experienced is filled with memories of dying people.

Would you want to live a life with flashes and images of screaming people.. Every time if you go to bed you remember the victims and your own comerads dying.

Posted

War veterans don't kill themselves or look for the opportunity to die, they are horrible memories, but some people do accept the possibility of death and don't mind seeing it. Some people in the middle-east see dying as serving allah. The parents of suicide bombers are proud and show no remorse or horror at the idea.

Posted

War veterans can possibly become serial killers in the future, if the memories keep driving them crazy.

Killing becomes normal just like a predator in the wild, seeking for a victim.

That's what they atleast explained on Discovery channel.

Posted

That refers to unstable peoplee, who refuse to help themselves. And that kind of thing is rare, and only happens in a few countries. In the middle-east it doesn't happen, because they're fanatics. And it doesn't happen in America because veterans get benefits, and can see therapists.

Posted

War does terrible things to the minds of soldiers - but that doesn't mean they will become serial killers! In fact, it is quite the opposite - you become so used to seeing death, that life becomes more value to you and you spend your life thanking the world your family is still alive. My grandfather served in the WWII and was the happiest man I've seen.

Posted

Exactly, my grandfather was in the war and he is one of the nicest people I know. He ended up with a scholarship and went to Yale. He is now the director of the physics department in my town. All the veterans I know are great people.

Posted

I think communism was a great idea, but it's almost impossible to implement it with great success. The USSR was stable for a while but not more then a few decades. In a world like ours communism just doesn't work. A large communist state is highly unstable, and volatile. While I respect it's founders for their vision of an equal world, it just can't be implemented.

Posted

I think communism was a great idea, but it's almost impossible to implement it with great success. The USSR was stable for a while but not more then a few decades. In a world like ours communism just doesn't work. A large communist state is highly unstable, and volatile. While I respect it's founders for their vision of an equal world, it just can't be implemented.

Especially if their creators just wanted to rule. Even Marx said Russia is a country unable to build a communistic state.

Posted

But russia did have some captilasts the Tsrs were heavy capitalists

and there were some imperialists too, as lenin said imperialism is the highest form of capitalism

Posted

Actually, Russia was barely out of feudalism when the revolution took place. If you're going straight from feudalism to communism, you're asking for trouble...

Posted

I think that as long as unmoral people exist it hinders it. Unfortunately communism doesn't really have much hope, because someone always wants more than everybody else. Russia started out communism with a satisfactory economy so they were able to conquer a lot of area around them. A while later they just couldn't afford any mass invasions or attacks on anoyone. As we see now Russia is becoming a more peaceful country. Being of Russian descent myself, I'm pleased to see it.

Posted

No, that wasn't the problem. The fatal flaw of Russian communism was the lack of democracy. This allowed corrupt madmen like Stalin to take over the system and turn the noble ideals of communism into an orwellian nightmare.

Posted

Czechoslovakia (I mean first republic between WWs) was classical type of capitalistic country, which Marx wanted to build communism. But communism brought only degeneration...

Russian czar was no capitalist, Russia had in 1917 no industry, only feudal agriculture. Marxistic word "imperialism" is specifical. We think about it as "lust of large countries for smaller ones' territory", marxism defined it as "rule of global monopolic corporations". Yet communism was most imperialistic, because whole economy was in state's monopole.

Posted

Yes, and the state should have been in the hands of the people. But it wasn't... and that's why communism turned into such an oppressive system.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.