Terror Posted October 3, 2002 Share Posted October 3, 2002 not all, but a lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devastator_Mech Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Exactly, almost the entire china, most of Asia and part of Europe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Glory to the Kahn! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devastator_Mech Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Although he was the greatest conqueror, but it was impossible for him occupy such a huge empire and the great Mongolian Empire start falling dramatically after his death.He was consided as the greatest conqueror is not only because of the size of the land he conquered, one fact is he used even a smaller army than what Alexander The Great used to build his empire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Harkonnen Posted October 4, 2002 Author Share Posted October 4, 2002 who would have won between Khan and Alexander?I think Alexander, cos what he conquered was areas with countries with better fighting skills than the ones in Asia and Europe(noth southern europe) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devastator_Mech Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 I'm not sure who'll win, but the matter of fact is Khan has a huge advantage over Alexander. Firstly, Mongolian horses are much more used to harsh conditions and could travel for days without food and water(not sure about water), secondly, is the Mongolians have great archery skills and could shoot on a horse back while its running with surprising accuracy making it a huge advantage when this skill is mixed with strategy i.e pretend to retreat to lure enemy to chase them and then back fire, this strategy works perfectly with their special skills.(Hit&Run)These 2 advantage leads to the victory of every battle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Golden Horde was NOT an empire, it was just one bigger mongolian tribe which controlled some others made some long range raids to west. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devastator_Mech Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Whats Golden Horde? I've never heard of it, please explain CLEARLY. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Be aware on history in school and you will find out. It's a "official" name of the Djingiskhan's tribe alliance, or if you want "empire". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devastator_Mech Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 I listen carefully at school.What does this unknown stupid tribe have to do with Khan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 THIS STUPID TRIBE ARE MONGOLS! How can I say it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devastator_Mech Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Mongolia is the "official" name of many different tribes which makes up it, and Djingiskhan is the tribe which rules over all other tribes. Is that what your trying to explain?If so, what about it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terror Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Khan would surely win, since khan was in a later age than alexander and they used superior tactics. they could ride horses because of the invention of the saddle. in the time of alexander this was not very effective because people couldn't ride a horse very well without a saddle besides the power of the mongolian was that they used hit and run attacks using horses. so if you want to beat that you'll need faster soldiers than foot soldiers or war elephants. and besides, khan not only conquered most of asia and part of europe but also syria and other countries in the middle east, all part of the saracen army. The mongolians were not stopped until they met up with a superior force in egypt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quoudam72 Posted October 4, 2002 Share Posted October 4, 2002 Mongol conquests were sucessful due to two important factors. One was military intelligence. The Mongols depended on a network of spies and usually had extensive information of an enemy before they engaged them in battle. The other was their use of psychological warfare. All who surrender will be spared;whoever does not surrender but opposes with struggle and dissension, shall be annihilated.--Genghis Khan With Khan's reputation it made sense for a conquered army to surrender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devastator_Mech Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 Anyone red this? Although he was the greatest conqueror, but it was impossible for him occupy such a huge empire and the great Mongolian Empire start falling dramatically after his death.He was consided as the greatest conqueror is not only because of the size of the land he conquered, one fact is he used even a smaller army than what Alexander The Great used to build his empire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 So, maybe because it wasn't empire in right word meaning. Alexander installed some archons to his conquered lands, but Djingiskhan ruled only the khanate in Asia, other lands were just under pressure of his warriors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devastator_Mech Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 I would love to reply, but the matter of fact is, there's no such word as "archon/s" would you please explain? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terror Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 All who surrender will be spared;whoever does not surrender but opposes with struggle and dissension, shall be annihilated.--Genghis Khan no, if khan besieged a city and the city tried to defend himself all inhabitants, i say ALL inhabitants, woman, children, cripple were as good as dead since once khan got trough into the city he murdered every single person in the city, they did this in russia and china, killing thousands of people just because of vengeance. genghis khan was an ass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 If my memory serves me right, Ghengis Khan did not conquer the whole of China, just a large part of it. I believe his sun Kubilaj finished the job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terror Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 that may be correct, but the point is we're talkin about the mongolian empire not only one khan, and as far as i know they got as far as vietnam meaning they conquered china from north to south totally, i do not know if they also conquered it totally from west to east though :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 Off topic, in the Earth 2150 storyline the Eurasian Dynasty is ruled by Djengis Khans decendants- kick ass :). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terror Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 *slams head on desk* you can't wait for earth 2160 can't you?, not sure, it's just a guess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema Posted October 5, 2002 Share Posted October 5, 2002 Yay, I can hardly wait. Earth 2150:TMP will definately be the best RTS (IMO anyway :) ) till the release of Earth 2160, and otherwise I'd still have FA: WoV in the meantime :). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inoculator9 Posted October 6, 2002 Share Posted October 6, 2002 The Mongolian Empire was easily the biggest. Obviously the Mongols system of control over conquered areas was not as efficient as it could have been. But what makes a town or a city part of an empire or a country? The paid tributes, we pay taxes. The areas the Mongols defeated existed as parts of the Mongolian Empire in this manner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted October 6, 2002 Share Posted October 6, 2002 Naaaaaa it was the otts. Easy.Lets tally up the marks shall we?Saudi arabia(most of it,dam bediwins)Yeman,Qotar,Oman,United arab emmerets,Iraq, deep into Iran,Georigan States,Southern russia,Ukrain,Romaina,Moteagro,Serbia,Greece, Southern Austira, Hungery, Egpyt,Algires,Morroco,Libeya, Southern Poland.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.