Inoculator9 Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Yeah! We'll make a sitcom spinoff too... maybe a new version of Running Man?
Nyarlathotep Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Yeah! We'll make a sitcom spinoff too... maybe a new version of Running Man?Well make me the first. Just to show Ex we're honest. He has put me up for a ban. I wouldn't mind being in the first poll.
Inoculator9 Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Lets just put the whole Raad in for kicks ;)
EWS Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Ill be the host of the program that discusses the events that have taken place but noone actually watches
Andrew Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Who would feed the people in the Dungeon if were all in the Dungeon? AARRGGGG!!!
Inoculator9 Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Gob's tiny little off spring Dr. Yeti-s'alot ;) He'll shovel it down into dry throats :D
Harkdawg Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Yes this is very good idea Gob, i understand by voting like this u get the picture what the majority thinks and u can act that way. Props to Gob!
Mahdi Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Well, my position hasn't changed in a few years, but here it goes again:Lets just ban everybody. So much simplier that way.
Kyle Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 i like the idea of voting on who to ban...as long as Gob has the final say as whether or not to ban someone...i think it will work out fine... 8)
Inoculator9 Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 If it were to happen, that is the only form I would personally support.
Warskum Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 Warskummaybe you should re-read the topic , then come back and appolagise for getting it wrong...(but i doubt you will)shy
Caid Ivik Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 What kind of thread is this? Participating on it is as if we were to make guilotines for own necks...
Dante Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 Not for all of us. Just specific annoying people... ;DÂ
nampigai Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 What kind of thread is this? Participating on it is as if we were to make guilotines for own necks...c'mon Caid, this way you'll know if people like you or not, it's gonna be fun.
Terror Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 wheheh yeah that too :P . Well i won't vote against many if any people at all anyway so it's not so bad :) . If 75% votes me out, then i'm out no problem :) .
Nyarlathotep Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 c'mon Caid, this way you'll know if people like you or not, it's gonna be fun.That's the thing (I know it was funny meant), what you said is going to happen, although it isn't meant that way. People actually will vote for a ban if they dislike the person, instead of banning a person cause he/she broke the rules, hence why I dislike the idea. Yet still I wouldn't mind being used as a first trail :)
Terror Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 hmm, but there is a problem though. To get the 100% you will need everyone to vote. Ofcourse there is always a 100% but there is a good chance that many people who think that he/she's ok and don't take the effort to vote. While the people who do dislike him/her ofcourse all vote, trying to get him/her out.
nampigai Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 That's the thing (I know it was funny meant), what you said is going to happen, although it isn't meant that way. People actually will vote for a ban if they dislike the person, instead of banning a person cause he/she broke the rules, hence why I dislike the idea. Yet still I wouldn't mind being used as a first trail :)if people vote for me I'll leave out of my own free will.and I won't vote for people I just dislike, that's childish, I'll vote for people I find so f****** anoying that they should be put down for the sake of mankind.
shygirl4 Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 its removed, but i remember that you could not give valid arguments so u stated to call every1 an idiot, so i said something like, "dont argue wih an idiot or she wil drag you to her level and beat u with experience", and ur next post was: War ur an idiot, el thats flaming and i was not the only one u called an idiot...warskum you can
Terror Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 Offtopic: :) ok you two, stop it now. I checked the thread you were talking about in the dungeon and realy, i cannot pick sides. Shygirl could be a bit more tolerant and not throwing with words like idiot though. Ofcourse everyone can have his/her own opinion. But we should respect the opinion of other people too.I remember it was about communism (ofcourse, it was started by Edric O ;) ). And though i don't think Communism works, I cannot prove that it doesn't so that's all i can say.. i don't THINK it works.Ontopic:... :P
Nyarlathotep Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 War, Sky, create a new thread if you'd wish to start a new discussion :)
Atomic Mitten Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 I think Gob is right.Maybe forum members don't apreciate how tolerant Gob is.He doesn't censor peoples right of free speech like other forums do.As I found out today !It is a democratic way to let the mebers decide who gets banned and who doesn't,but the final decision lies with the forum admin.IMHO
Recommended Posts