C & C Generals

Gobalopper · February 28, 2003

Stop abusing the linking functions, if you continue you'll be banned.

DukeLeto · February 28, 2003

Click HERE!

LOOK WHAT YOU DID TO MY INTERNET EXPLORER! TELL ME HOW TO FIX IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( :([attachment archived by Gobalopper]

Frodo · February 28, 2003

what's wrong with it?

DukeLeto · February 28, 2003

The whole window is halfway down the screen. It supposed to be maximized.

Edit: Clearing my cookies fixed it. Mad, never, EVER, EVER do ANYTHING like that again.

thomas · March 1, 2003

its unfair to the GLA and besides USA advancing so much faster but still using some old tanks?CHina uses trucks to collect resource but already have flame tanks?LOL

huh flame tanks were used in WW2

Mad Rhetoric · March 1, 2003

Oh dear...I've gotten Gob mad...*thinks of all those posters unlucky enough to stray into the FAQs... :-X :-X *From now on I think I'll just say I hate Gen. Btw,DukeLeto,I'm sorry about the internet explorer.It went fine on my internet explorer,and I've got a lower version than you do!The only time it malfunctioned(and by malfunctioned,I mean it kept duplicating itself) was when my comp was going really slowing and was all laggy anyways.Sorry,again.But you can't stop ME from visiting it!*Starts rolling on the floor and having a seizure because of the flashing black and white stuff*

Anathema · March 1, 2003

Er Scytale I believe the Paladin is already used by the US militairy.

Harkdawg · March 1, 2003

lol no game is perfect :)

Khan · March 1, 2003

Apart from Generals ;)

exatreide · March 1, 2003

generals aint perfect....

Tib sun is perfect :)

Khan · March 1, 2003

Oh come on those graphics were worse than Cryos Dune.

exatreide · March 1, 2003

pff better than ra2

tib sun had subeteranian units, and destructible terrain, nuff said :)

thomas · March 2, 2003

so tib sun wasn't that great I played the first 4-5 :P :P missions for each side then quit. :P

exatreide · March 2, 2003

u dont know what your missing man :)

ken124578 · March 2, 2003

Tiberium sun and red alert 1 sold alot of copies, how many times did tiberium sun gone gold? 4 or more times? :-

DukeLeto · March 2, 2003

I don't know, but RA1 is the best selling RTS of all time. (Second being StarCraft.)

I didn't like TibSun as much as RA2. The destroyable cliffs were nice, but I found TibSun too dark and gloomy. Plus the things that were too weak to be devastating but just powerful enough to be frustrating, like the multimissile and subterainean units. It's irritating when one of your Power Plants gets Ion Cannoned every two minutes!

thomas · March 2, 2003

yea and in generals it takes 6 minutes for the super weapons to charge and 4 for hte particle cannon plus it gets announced they have it.

ken124578 · March 2, 2003

Same as RA2.

Avrillian_Sard01 · March 3, 2003

The battle master seems like an old sherman or something.

Actually, I think it was based on a T-54 tank used by the Soviet forces. But I find it weird that they can upgrade the Battlemaster Tank w/ a NUCLEAR, (I repeat), NUCLEAR ENGINE? Is it even possible? Sure, some time ago they tried testing tank armor w/ depleted Uranium in it, but went the way of the dodo because of the possible danger. Depleted uranium shells are possible (case in point: The A-10 Thunderbolt uses 30 mm bullets w/ depleted uranium-core in it.), but a nuclear engine on a tank?! Try sounding a bit more logical!!

I would prefer it if they made it like this (But its just me):

Upgraded diesel engines

- +25% Battlemaster speed

And leave the nuclear tank upgrade to the Overlord Tank, since its BIG...

DukeLeto · March 3, 2003

But I find it weird that they can upgrade the Battlemaster Tank w/ a NUCLEAR, (I repeat), NUCLEAR ENGINE? Is it even possible? Sure, some time ago they tried testing tank armor w/ depleted Uranium in it, but went the way of the dodo because of the possible danger. Depleted uranium shells are possible (case in point: The A-10 Thunderbolt uses 30 mm bullets w/ depleted uranium-core in it.), but a nuclear engine on a tank?! Try sounding a bit more logical!!

It IS 30 years in the future. I would think that nuclear shielding would have improved substantially by then...And it is a fairly large tank.

lowzeewee · March 3, 2003

its unfair to the GLA and besides USA advancing so much faster but still using some old tanks?CHina uses trucks to collect resource but already have flame tanks?LOL
huh flame tanks were used in WW2

And still used now?LOL.....I read somewhere on this site that USA and UK use some 1980s or earlier tank but have super-advanced fighters and GLA use some toys as armies?

Avrillian_Sard01 · March 3, 2003

It IS 30 years in the future. I would think that nuclear shielding would have improved substantially by then...And it is a fairly large tank.

Not as big as a Crusader, Paladin Tank or an Overlord, though... But I did say, "Its just me..."

I tell you, it is based on a T-54...

Okay...help again...is there an mp3 of that intro music in Generals where a voice says: "In the modern world...blah blah..." I only want the music and not the voice...(I presume that its from the US music tracks...) And also, any good GLA music?

Anathema · March 3, 2003

So, is it worth the full price? (45 euros)

thomas · March 3, 2003

yea but the online setup sucks :P >:(

Terror · March 4, 2003

well, they have nuclear subs, why not tanks eh? :)

Sign In

C & C Generals

Recommended Posts

Gobalopper

DukeLeto

Frodo

DukeLeto

thomas

Mad Rhetoric

Anathema

Harkdawg

Khan

exatreide

Khan

exatreide

thomas

exatreide

ken124578

DukeLeto

thomas

ken124578

Avrillian_Sard01

DukeLeto

lowzeewee

Avrillian_Sard01

Anathema

thomas

Terror

Join the conversation

Activity

Important Information