Anathema Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 If scientist discover a creature that runs around, has fur, claws, bones etc but still can use photosyntheses, would you still call it a plant? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjCiD Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 You think I typed that question for my benefit ::)?no, I just think you are trying to come out clean. Nope, I made him do it...No you did not...ok maybe I didn't ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Plant and animal characteristics. No, that would be like an overgrown protista. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 BTW, wasn't this thread about aliens? Now we're talking about plants and photosythetic furry little creatures, lol. What is wrong with this picture ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 there is no good reason i see to assume life evolved from chaos anywhere in the universe, including earth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Well if it is evolved enough to where it uses optimal spectrum areas, it would be green (since plants today use both ends of the spectrum, and hardly at all green since it reflects it and not absorbs it), and would need certain things for it to continue, such as thykaloids, stromas, stomas, stomatas, grana (bunches of thykaloids), etc etc. A lot of things must be in place for photosynthesis to occur. And the only kingdom that has these is plant kingdom. So having fur and claws, etc, would be of no use since it gets its energy from photosynthesis, not other animals. But carnivorous plants only get carbohydrates from photosynthesis, and obtain nitrogen and other minerals from insects.*Edit: Forgot to mention carnivorous plants evolved to be carnivorous due to lack of nitrogen in poor conditions such as acid bogs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 there is no good reason i see to assume life evolved from chaos anywhere in the universe, including earth.People like to believe in things that they can explain, but that does not work with the theory of Evolution, because it has many faults. That is why all great scientists-atheists in the end come to a point that there is a greater being in the World that created life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Let's not get into this in this thread Vigil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 [quote author=Acriku Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DjCiD Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 well if a planet has the same chance to get big bang and life evolve then why dont we see it happening at all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 [quote author=Acriku Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Cant we all just get along?settle down you two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 well if a planet has the same chance to get big bang and life evolve then why dont we see it happening at all?Life cannot be created out of nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Vigil, protista are so various in form from ancient protists, that they can have eukaryotic characteristics (plant and animal). Some are animal-like, some are plant-like, but the plant kingdom, EVERY plant uses photosynthesis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 [quote author=ExAtreides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 well if a planet has the same chance to get big bang and life evolve then why dont we see it happening at all?Life cannot be created out of nothing.oh god we all now whats coming on now.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 "And the only kingdom that has these is plant kingdom"This is what you said at first though. I was just correcting you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Vigil, we talk about plants because someone made a valid question conscerning finding animal-like creatures with photosynthesis, YOU made a direct statement trying to debunk evolution itself, and athiest scientists, and since that can get more heated than plants, I cannot allow that discussion in here. Edit: Granted, I was wrong, but stop being so picky :P lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 [quote author=ExAtreides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Nema, you claim that carbon has a propensity to be complex. This cannot be the case at all. Nothing in the universe, according to physics, has the inherent propensity to become more complex, save for intelligence. I deny your claim that carbon has this propensity. You need evidence if you are making this as a scientific claim, lest it just be a faith belief you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 [quote author=Acriku Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 A thread so controversial and ambiguous is bound to go offtopic, just as long as it gets back ontopic :)Empr, look at our cellular makeup today. Then look at the single-cells a looong time ago. Pretty amazing eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Empr, look at our cellular makeup today. Then look at the single-cells a looong time ago. Pretty amazing eh? hmmm our cellular makeup today is the same as humans have always had.the cellular makeup of a starfish today is the same as it always had.single celled life forms today are the same as they've always been. Amazing? Yea life is amazing. It amazes me that God made such a complex, highly ordered, non-random structure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zamboe Posted October 29, 2002 Share Posted October 29, 2002 Sure, human body is the most amazing thing, can't be compared with anything human-made.However I always been a bit sourprised that the overall thermic performance of the body is quite low (not efficient) a simple gasoline engine is more efficient in terms of use of energy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted October 30, 2002 Share Posted October 30, 2002 aliens do exist. me friends dad is an alien, hes canadian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.