Site Updates

[Andrew]

[attachment archived by Gobalopper]

[Andrew]

ok, i have actually gotten a dune miniseries worm pic. not the greatest and will only work if the transparency thing works. a little cut off at bottom but best i can do at 1 in the morning.

[Andrew]

and i got one of Paul atriedes. its ok. tell me if you think they are bad or something.

like i said the backround(the white part), is supposed to be transparent. i believe that it is the right side of the pick.

[Andrew]

I take it no one looks at this thread or cares about it.(even though it has only been 12 hours ;) ) im thinking I should start a thread about avatars.(more attention)

oh and Gob there are 4 new avatars, not 3 as I stated in the message.

EDIT - oops guess I could hvae put this message in the other, was used to new ones becasue of files.

[Dunenewt]

They're good but I don't think you should have written Paul on the last one

[Andrew]

They're good but I don't think you should have written Paul on the last one

quite right, but there was a blurry thing there. me try to fix it.

Thanks for opinion.

EDIT - i fixed the word Paul and put different colors in where it was.

i beleive "patent" pending on these pics. will find out soon. Also if the avatars need to be jpg, i can redo these ones that are gifs. i thought the avatars you could chose from were gifs, but me could be wrong.

thanks Timenn

[Timenn]

gif or jpg, it doesn't matter. They can both

[Gobalopper]

The Bi-La Kaifa and worm ones are good. But Paul is hard to see and the other just seems to overloaded with text.

[Andrew]

[attachment archived by Gobalopper]

[Mahdi]

Heh, I had that as a sig pic for about a month awhile back:)

[rogue1896]

[attachment archived by Gobalopper]

[Gobalopper]

Hidden text is now revealed by hovering over it with your mouse. Assuming your browser supports it.

[rogue1896]

[hide]hidden text[/hide]

EDIT - apparently my browser doesn't support it. :-

[Gobalopper]

I know Mozilla and its variants will, not sure about IE but I doubt it.

[rogue1896]

well that'd explain it. i use the internet explorer. oh well. i'll just stick with highlighting. it's no big deal.

[DjCiD]

darn that seems like a cool trick... wonder if IE will ever get it?

[IxianMace]

Lol, I have 3 browsers installed on my computer. IE 5.0, Mozilla 1.1b, and Frank Herbert's 'Dune' Browser, which I think uses the same kind of software as IE. Anyway it doesn't work under the Dune Browser (which I'm using at the moment).

[Timenn]

It doesn't work with me either Gob. I have Mozilla v 1.01

[Andrew]

mine doesnt work eithor, i have to select it...i use IE 6

[Timenn]

Hmm, Gob said he wasn't sure about IE

Hmm, it looks like the icon of a locked sticky thread has turned out weird. Do you see the same black mess?

[DukeLeto]

No...

[Timenn]

Never mind. It's gone...

Hmm, Gob, didn't you fix those url's so you don't needed those url tags anymore?

Look at this link for example:

http://www.dune2k.com/?page=view&=/images/emperor/units/subhouse/FremenWarrior-Big.jpg

It's broken.

But not when I use those tags:

http://www.dune2k.com/?page=view&=/images/emperor/units/subhouse/FremenWarrior-Big.jpg

[Gobalopper]

You just had some weird stuff in the url.

I guess it might not work in older versions of Mozilla, I'm using 1.3alpha and it works there, or maybe you have a cached version of the stylesheet. All it did was .hide:hover{ color:#EEEEEE; } which works for links but I guess some browsers have problems when its a <div> tag.

[Timenn]

It's your fault of that weird stuff. It's a link of fed2k.

Actually, it changed to wrong every time I edited it.

Ok, I will try to upload Mozilla then.

Just at www.mozilla.org ?

[Gobalopper]

Ya I have to use & in order for it to be XHTML compliant so that might screw links up...

Yep I would get 1.2.1 or maybe Phoenix 0.5, 1.3alpha still isn't very stable.