GUNWOUNDS Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 I noticed it said it would be ready in 2008. Haha. It'll be obsolete the day it comes out. Especially since the russians arent helping out anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted February 21, 2006 Share Posted February 21, 2006 I wouldn't say it would be totally obselete as it is making use of RCS reducing methods and radar absorbing paint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Posted February 23, 2006 Author Share Posted February 23, 2006 Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad blamed the United States and Israel on Thursday for the destruction of a Shiite shrine's golden dome in Iraq, saying it was the work of "defeated Zionists and occupiers."Yeah, I'm sure the US is dumb enough to think that bombing a shrine will make Muslims powerless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 I wonder why Isreal hasn't launched a pre emptive strike on the reactor like they did against Iraq, now would be the time.. With Iraq ocupied by the US, refueling over the nation wouldn't be a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 Maybe cause that's an act of war? Iran has a lot more allies than Iraq had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 yes alot more allies but Iran is more Taliban-like which means the US wouldnt catch too much flak.... not that they would care anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 The Israli bombing of Iraq's reactor in 81 could have been considered a act of war, but it wasn't. I think that after all talks break down Isreal won't hesitate to do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemafakei Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Insofar as there is a nuclear weapons programme, it can be developed in a way that is much less centralised. Libya certainly learned from the destruction of Iraq's reactor, and, had it not abandoned the plans, the it would have been difficult to stop it indeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dude_Doc Posted April 8, 2006 Share Posted April 8, 2006 http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789,806623,00.htmlSwedish link, but it says that the US is ready to fire nuclear weapons against Iran's nuclear facilities, and that the planning for this "operation" is huge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted April 9, 2006 Share Posted April 9, 2006 Yeah I read this in the paper today. Basically, they want to fire nuclear bunker buster bombs against Iran's facilities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Posted April 9, 2006 Author Share Posted April 9, 2006 The US are planning on using WMD on Iran.English version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted May 31, 2006 Share Posted May 31, 2006 I just found Iran's nuclear reactors on Google Earth :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemafakei Posted May 31, 2006 Share Posted May 31, 2006 Gah, damn you! Well done, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 I found a massive runway on google maps in Iran a while back, so I looked in the same area on Google Earth and found the reactor pretty quickly. Have you been looking for it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mordusxxx Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 All this is, is just another excuse to get oil, im sure mr. pres is figuring out that all the oil will be gone over there soon so he wants to capatilize on it and try to get as much damn oil from every middle eastern country as soon as he can before his term runs out, i mean cmon anyone in there right mind knows what hes doing... stupid old man... he going to say they have fifty nuclear warheads go over destroy there economy and take there oil plain and simple Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted June 1, 2006 Share Posted June 1, 2006 I'm guessing you'd vote for Bush then......I don't think your post even deserves a response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mordusxxx Posted June 3, 2006 Share Posted June 3, 2006 all im saying is, why do we have to control everything that goes on in the world? what gives us the right to just dominate some middle eastern country because there building nuclear reactors? why dont we do anything to korea or china? because there not as weak as iran thats why, all we are doing is bullying around some third world country ..... seems like you dune, must like the tyranny of the united states, maybe you should move over here. >:( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khan Posted June 4, 2006 Share Posted June 4, 2006 Or just wait for it to move over here ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunner154 Posted June 4, 2006 Share Posted June 4, 2006 Or just wait for it to move over here ;)LOL! ;DThat was a really good one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted June 4, 2006 Share Posted June 4, 2006 all im saying is, why do we have to control everything that goes on in the world? what gives us the right to just dominate some middle eastern country because there building nuclear reactors?Because, to quote the Spiderman film, "With great power, comes great responsibility." U.S.A. has the power to sort out these countries, so it should. Otherwise, what's to stop Iran nuking Israel? Or Iraq invading Kuwait? As the one hyper power in the world, U.S.A. cannot stay in isolation, because if it had before, what would have happened? There might be a Soviet France right now, that's one possibility. why dont we do anything to korea or china? because there not as weak as iran thats why, all we are doing is bullying around some third world country Have you seen the size of China, and the size of its military? I'm guessing not. If U.S.A. attacked China, there would be widespread devastation. China has the capability to put a man in space, or a nuke in NY. As to Korea? There hasn't been a Korea for over 50 years. I'm assuming you mean D.P.R.K. (North Korea), as South Korea is an ally of the U.S. North Korea possesses nukes as well, and could pretty much wipe out their southern neighbours, so any military operation would have to be carefully planned. But then you'd still be bossing about a "third world" country...... seems like you dune, must like the tyranny of the united states, maybe you should move over here. >:(No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 thanks newt you saved me alot of typing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted June 5, 2006 Share Posted June 5, 2006 Anything for you Gunny baby :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mordusxxx Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 yes i understand the quote from spiderman, but that doesnt mean that the u.s should go over and deplete someones natuaral resources for its own personal gain, have u seen the fricking oil prices boom in the past three years? u think theres no coinsidence with us invading afghan or iraq, and all these oil companies getting so rich? take a look at the president, hes not solving any issue he should be doing, the govt. there is still in shambles the people hate the usa and everyone going over to fight for there country are pissed off because were not there for the right reasons. Theres noone in the world that tells the u.s what we can and cant do or why we shouldnt do a certain thing, all im saying is iran is growing just like we did, if they drop bombs on countries then yes we should act upon that, but until them why not monitor there work and go from there? remember all those nukes in iraq?!?!? yeah thought so.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Actually, with the death of Zarqawi, oil prices have dropped. And it was the US who killed him. So that defeats your point. Besides, thy were looking for WMDs, not nukes, in Iraq. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Whee. The death of a man who couldn't even load a machine gun, whose political role was incredibly exaggerated. Just as the importance of his death has been. This is hardly a turning point.Also, it doesn't matter what they were looking for because they didn't find anything. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.