Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wonder why Isreal hasn't launched a pre emptive strike on the reactor like they did against Iraq, now would be the time.. With Iraq ocupied by the US, refueling over the nation wouldn't be a problem.

Posted

The Israli bombing of Iraq's reactor in 81 could have been considered a act of war, but it wasn't. I think that after all talks break down Isreal won't hesitate to do it.

Posted

Insofar as there is a nuclear weapons programme, it can be developed in a way that is much less centralised. Libya certainly learned from the destruction of Iraq's reactor, and, had it not abandoned the plans, the it would have been difficult to stop it indeed.

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

I found a massive runway on google maps in Iran a while back, so I looked in the same area on Google Earth and found the reactor pretty quickly.  Have you been looking for it?

Posted

All this is, is just another excuse to get oil, im sure mr. pres is figuring out that all the oil will be gone over there soon so he wants to capatilize on it and try to get as much damn oil from every middle eastern country as soon as he can before his term runs out, i mean cmon anyone in there right mind knows what hes doing... stupid  old man... he going to say they have fifty nuclear warheads go over destroy there economy and take there oil plain and simple

Posted

all im saying is, why do we have to control everything that goes on in the world? what gives us the right to just dominate some middle eastern country because there building nuclear reactors? why dont we do anything to korea or china? because there not as weak as iran thats why, all we are doing is bullying around some third world country ..... seems like you dune, must like the tyranny of the united states, maybe you should move over here. >:(

Posted

all im saying is, why do we have to control everything that goes on in the world? what gives us the right to just dominate some middle eastern country because there building nuclear reactors?

Because, to quote the Spiderman film, "With great power, comes great responsibility."  U.S.A. has the power to sort out these countries, so it should.  Otherwise, what's to stop Iran nuking Israel?  Or Iraq invading Kuwait?  As the one hyper power in the world, U.S.A. cannot stay in isolation, because if it had before, what would have happened?  There might be a Soviet France right now, that's one possibility.

why dont we do anything to korea or china? because there not as weak as iran thats why, all we are doing is bullying around some third world country

Have you seen the size of China, and the size of its military? I'm guessing not.  If U.S.A. attacked China, there would be widespread devastation.  China has the capability to put a man in space, or a nuke in NY.  As to Korea?  There hasn't been a Korea for over 50 years.  I'm assuming you mean D.P.R.K. (North Korea), as South Korea is an ally of the U.S.  North Korea possesses nukes as well, and could pretty much wipe out their southern neighbours, so any military operation would have to be carefully planned.  But then you'd still be bossing about a "third world" country.

..... seems like you dune, must like the tyranny of the united states, maybe you should move over here. >:(

No.

Posted

yes i understand the quote from spiderman, but that doesnt mean that the u.s should go over and deplete someones natuaral resources for its own personal gain, have u seen the fricking oil prices boom in the past three years? u think theres no coinsidence with us invading afghan or iraq, and all these oil companies getting so rich? take a look at the president, hes not solving any issue he should be doing, the govt. there is still in shambles the people hate the usa and everyone going over to fight for there country are pissed off because were not there for the right reasons. Theres noone in the world that tells the u.s what we can and cant do or why we shouldnt do a certain thing, all im saying is iran is growing just like we did, if they drop bombs on countries then yes we should act upon that, but until them why not monitor there work and go from there? remember all those nukes in iraq?!?!? yeah thought so....

Posted

Actually, with the death of Zarqawi, oil prices have dropped.  And it was the US who killed him.  So that defeats your point. Besides, thy were looking for WMDs, not nukes, in Iraq.

Posted

Whee. The death of a man who couldn't even load a machine gun, whose political role was incredibly exaggerated. Just as the importance of his death has been. This is hardly a turning point.

Also, it doesn't matter what they were looking for because they didn't find anything.  :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.