Jump to content

NOD vs GDI war


Seal89999

Recommended Posts

cyborg berserk is disabled in most version

APCs with those devil's tongue flame tanks really work well when there's no concrete on your enemy's base area.

well, destroy first powerplant, there always is nothing underĀ  ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, the GDI disc thrower is probably the best individual infantry unit in the game. Disc throwers are deadly effective against vehicles, infantry, massed units, and they make excellent cyborg killers. A team of four disc throwers and a medic can be assembled in no time, and they can easily hold off entire groups of tick tanks or cyborg rushes. You see, the disc thrower is commonly mistaken as being the GDI equivalent of the rocket trooper. It is not. The rocket trooper is an anti-tank, anti-air unit, slow, and good for defense. The disc thrower is different. The GDI disc thrower is generally effective against all ground units. In the long run, this is a tremendous advantage. And the disc thrower is relatively cheap as well. Not to mention it has the added benefit of bouncing projectiles, wreaking hell on massed enemy forces. That, and you get disc-throwers from the get-go who are, incidentially, cheaper than cyborgs.

Secondly, a mobile generator cannot have a base built around it, I do not think. You still need to shell out the credits for an MCV if you want another base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In newer versions, cyborg's cost is lowered. I think it even imbalances him, as abilities like tiberium heal or two lives are truly terrific. And have an elite buggy, then you can crush these discoboloi easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caid, you do realize that an Elite buggy is perhaps the hardest single elite to win in the entire game? The weapons on the buggy are only really effective for infantry, and since an infantryman's cost is so much lower than the buggy, the buggy has to kill a lot to even win veterancy. Also, the disc thrower's range is pretty good, and if the buggy wants to rush the fellow... well, I dunno about that. Not to mention that a buggy's armor -- elite or no -- is more or less paper mache'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caid, you do realize that an Elite buggy is perhaps the hardest single elite to win in the entire game? The weapons on the buggy are only really effective for infantry, and since an infantryman's cost is so much lower than the buggy, the buggy has to kill a lot to even win veterancy. Also, the disc thrower's range is pretty good, and if the buggy wants to rush the fellow... well, I dunno about that. Not to mention that a buggy's armor -- elite or no -- is more or less paper mache'.

Actually, buggy is a perfect harvester killer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Global Defense Initiative" 1 570 results vs "Brotherhood of Nod" 2 740 results

Nod wins!

GDI 519 000 results vs Nod 2 280 000 results

Nod wins!

Even Google knows the truth.Ā  8)

Well obviously with words like Brotherhood and Nod, two pretty mundane words, and GDI is an Abreviation, whilst Nod is just a word...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey atleast our AI Dosnt stab us in the back the first chance it gets!

Thats because our computer has alot more brains than your stupid old EVA program....you can hardly call that an AI.....Cabal was far superior to EVA...there is no denying that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, EVA is a little ditzy sometimes. Don't get me wrong -- EVA is an analytical, well, machine. Her powers of analysis and deducation rival, and may even surpass CABAL. You see, EVA has no agenda, almost no personality, and instead has her full and undivided attention and potential put towards the advancement of GDI. Oh yes, EVA is a much more useful AI than CABAL who, if you read the other C&C thread, clearly has his own agenda -- even though she's less interesting. And, in fact, doesn't Nod end up teaming up with GDI to destroy CABAL, in both campaigns of Firestorm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad EVA is stupid.....

It thinks like a total machine, while CABAL was "smart" enough to learn how to have adaptive stratigies and think more humanlike....CABAL was alot more advanced and alot more intelligent and a much greater stratigist....EVA is just plain dumb...

Im not saying who is more loyal I am saying that who was the greater AI......stratigie,intelligence wise.....

No contest CABAL wins....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. CABAL's personality and masquerading as Kane is a distraction. Remember, GDI has the Philadelphia, in addition to countless nodes across the planet. GDI resources allow EVA to hold a great deal more computing power, space, and redundancies than CABAL, who is stored at a central core. If contact with the Philadelphia is lost, a backup EVA on the planet kicks in, and vice versa. In Firestorm, once CABAL's core was lost, CABAL was dead. Unlike CABAL, EVA is 100% dedicated to analysis and GDI campaigns. That, and she has far more resources. Her lack of personality and ditziness aside, she is an AI first, last, and only. CABAL is Kane first, and an AI second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.