Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought the thread was funny, it was awsome!

you reamber those people who blew up trains and killed germans left and right? hell by the time we got to paris they had practicly liberated themselvs

lol emp with a strategy like that you woyld get killed. You use ww2 as your only example of french cowardice. But what could have the french really done? the germans bombed their air fields, French tanks were superier compared with the german panzer mark I and II but to widespread to stop the german assult. The french couldnt have held the germans if they tried with everything they could. So they did the smart thing and surenderd ans saved thousands of french lives. But the fighting never stoped now did it? Nope.

Ya, the French Resistance was OK, but he is not talking about the normal French citizens who make up the resistance, he is talking about the government, which had NO PART in the French resistance, and which DOES have a history of being arogant(and I know I cannot spell, dont mention it please)

Durring WW2, the French government surrendered BEFORE the army in the on the battlefield was defeated. They surrendered and fled the country LONG before the Germans got to Paris. The Government was even trying to tell the commanders in the field how to fight while the Germans were invading. And I have to find my sorce again, cause I lost it, but durring the invasion, there was a commander who got a message from Paris stating that some French politition DIDN'T THINK THAT GERMANY WAS REALLY GOING TO INVADE! while all this was going on, the government was ordering French troops around in ways that made NO sense at all, and was almost opening a door to Paris for the Germans.

And on top of that, as soon as the NATO was formed to PROTECT france, France tried to Drop out of it, because they did not want to spend the money required to be spent on upkeeping something like that. Durring the 50's, France Tried to drop out of the UN, for the same reason, only strong negotiating by the US Diplomats kept them from leaving

(Wish they had though)

After WW2, EVERY country in Western Europe owed the US money(except maybe Spain and Portugal, not sure about them) many of them were going to have problems paying that money off, so the United States waived the debts, we just forgot them. Out of all the countries that owed us Money after WW2, only Norway payed us back. Out of all of western Europe, only Norway.

Then, in the 50's, France was having trouble with its economy, so the US pumped millions of dollars into france to re-establish their economy. A few months later, France starts boycotting American goods and requsting that Americans leave because they are unwanted, and De Gualle DEMANDED that all US/UN troops leave France.

THAT, is the government that he was protesting.

Oh, and a random, thought, why is France on the UN Security Counsol? They have not really participated or contributed to World Security recently. For that matter, france has not been on the winning side of a War since the French Navy helped durring the American Revolution

(The French Revolution does not count, of course the French would win the French Revolution)

Posted

LOL, guys, it's obviously a joke. Tell me SOME of you realized that?!?

I thought the part about boy scouts and the civillians wearing military clothing was hilarious...

Posted
I have been developing a strategic initiative to invade & topple the bigoted French government, and liberate the French people from their brainwashing.

Frounch are frounch,ammmmmeeeericannns are ammmmmeeeericannns....get it?Just because they don't support the war,doesn't mean that they think that they all hate ammmmmeeeericannns >:(

What the hell, don't quote his entire post lowzeewee. - Gobalopper

Posted

I'm just a little upset the French are speaking out agienst us while yet they wouldn't be if it wasn't for us giveing them freedom.

So, once you liberate a country it loses all right of an independant opinion?

Nevermind the fact that without the French you would still be an English colony. If the French didn't aid you your puny revolution against the British would have been crushed.

Posted

Actually we probably still would have won, it just would have taken a lot longer. The only time that the French were a defining point in the war was the battle of Yorktown, and that was by blocking the Brits retreat.

Posted

Nevermind the fact that without the French you would still be an English colony. If the French didn't aid you your puny revolution against the British would have been crushed.

lol, your kidding, right? The French were not really that important to our Revolution. Remember the war of 1812? The joined on the side of the French, and the d*mn bastards surrender a couple months later! And yet, we managed to beat the British alone.

Posted

Leto, 2 things:

First I don't see what it would change to the present situation. Glory is for the falsified ones so let this artificial glow that is not yours but some of your ancestors'.

Second, I'll still put an historical point straight: when we study the French Revolution, we lurn that one of the important point bringing to this revolution is the aid given to America because it put the funds down. So whattever its importance, it wasn't nothing. Doesn't change a thing about who made the revolution happen, but would Lafayette and friends agree with the empire now created when what they just done is going against the British empire???

PS: Anf if you think the American people are naturally better than the French people I'll get seriously worried since it's pretty eugenistic, isn't it? There are good people and bad people everywhere. They just think different things.

Posted

Nevermind the fact that without the French you would still be an English colony. If the French didn't aid you your puny revolution against the British would have been crushed.

lol, your kidding, right? The French were not really that important to our Revolution. Remember the war of 1812? The joined on the side of the French, and the d*mn bastards surrender a couple months later! And yet, we managed to beat the British alone.

Maybe thats becouse Napoleon was defeated at Waterloo, and they had no other choice then to agree to a surender(Napoleons army was sadly crushed after he demeanded the atack be on Wellingtons Center, And after Ney tossed a massive calvery charge at the british center and they held, and the fact that the French atack On Hougment had been driven back, the french were already in trouble, then the prussians came and it was chaos as the french retreated the only thing they could have done as they were heavily out numberd.)

And since the french army was disbanded as Napoleon was forced into exile, they couldnt have helped if they wanted to. So dont blame france

Blame Wellington and the Prussians for defeating Napoleon at waterloo in 1814 ::)

Posted

For that matter, france has not been on the winning side of a War since the French Navy helped durring the American Revolution

Then I guess you've never heard of an insignificant little general called Napoleon, have you? ::)

And as for your vaunted liberation of France in WW2...

Silly me! I thought that LIBERATING meant that the liberated country is FREE afterwards. Now I see that it actually means that the "liberated" country has to lick the boots of its "liberators" for the next 500 years. ::)

Posted

Oh! Edric how can you say that?! They don't have to lick boots (nor a*s!) only theyhave to become some kind of a colony.

//--

What's the difference between americans and soviets?

The americans leave without saying good-bye, while the soviets say good-bye without ever leaving.

//--

Now, after Iraq we can see that US has learned something from USSR.

Posted

Ok, ACE. Maybe I'm too serious. :P

But I really don't like SO MANY jokes about a country. That tends to be humiliating... :-

Posted

If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen. We've heard just as many anti-American jokes. We've seen Hitler-style hair and moustache drawn over the faces of coalition leaders, we've seen American flag's burning right, left, and center, we've seen Nazi symbols drawn over everything dear to the coalition, we've seen a 9/11 memorial burned and smashed, and a WWII memorial defaced. Don't be crying over jokes.

Posted

If it was in my power to protest or to act against what you just said I would have done that. I think it's worse to make fun of a country that debating over it.

And trashing the 11 sept. memorial? That's sick!!

Posted

And when has that been done? Certainly not in this war. Civillian casualties are sad and unfortunate, completely unintentional but sometimes necessary when the enemy stores arms in schools and uses human shields like we have seen. Civillian casualties are currently sitting at ~500. Yes, 500. Skeptics estimated millions. The UN estimated at least 500,000. Shows you how bad a state the UN is in when it misses estimates by 100,000%.

Posted

Alright, let me give an example of a happy, about-to-be-liberated Iraqi giving thanks to the US troops for his new freedom. Notice the friendly look on the US soldier about to liberate him:

USsoldierSadist.jpg

Posted

Sorry to disclaim Edric, but the guy's not American...

Why? Er...he ain't holding an M-16A2. The assault rifle he's holding is more likely to be the British L-85.

Since that rifle in the pic is standard issue to the British forces, in summary, the soldier is likely to be British...

Posted

I know he was corsican, but the people who live there are not french racially, they are more spanish, italian.

Posted

Looks to me like someone learned how to use Photoshop and seeing how the page that is from contains other fake pictures and incorrect captions it wouldn't surprise me.

Posted

If that picture was faked, then the guy who did it must be a genius. For all I can see, it's perfectly genuine...

Btw, sorry about the confusion, Sard. I don't know anything about guns, so I couldn't tell what kind of rifle he's holding. Well, I guess he's British then.

Posted

The picture quality is horrible something that is different from any other photo on the page it comes from.

Look at the guys hand, if this is a fake that would be the hardest to "fix" to the proper background colours, and by the looks of it they did a bad job and the guy is missing his pinky finger.

When you zoom in on the image you see a lot of odd inconsistencies in the colours.

The gun barrel is really odd looking, almost as if it extends longer then it should.

Lastly, that blue blanket seems out of place, almost like it belongs to something else.

Posted

What edric just did is what is so fricking stupid of people these days. They post a picture without the correct caption, and not checking if it is a valid or altered picture, and blame the Americans.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.