Gobalopper Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 Just doing this to see what people think. If you need clarification on any of the options just ask...
IxianMace Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 Believe it or not, I still honestly am of the opinion that Nav has a chance for redemption. I do not believe that he is a completely vile person that is just not worth the time. Given enough time, he may actually change, but in the manner that he's posting in at the present stage, it would seem logical to limit his content to one board.
rogue1896 Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 i recommend you lock the post so that people aren't tended to sway one way or another due to 'pity' remarks. or 'ban him' remarks. make people vote on how they feel now.
Navaros Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 i recommend you do nothing to me but also that you enforce your wrath against all the people who provoke me, whom are always allowed to provoke me and nothing ever gets done to them for itbtw they even break way more rules than me a lot of the time ie: saying they are gonna kill me and that i am a loser in real life etc. you don't see me taking personal shots like that, i just post the facts
rogue1896 Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 i recommend you do nothing to me but also that you enforce your wrath against all the people who provoke, whom are always allowed to provoke me and nothing ever gets done to them for ityou've provoked people for eons before you were finally 'permanently' banned. face it nav, you're gonna be banned, again. and on top of that we do not provoke you. we prove you're slanderous remarks and spam for what they truly are. why would you even attempt to still come to a forum where at least 80% of the people hate you?btw gob, i still think it would be a smart idea to lock this.
Anathema Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 Navaros rarely violates the rules as far as I can see, except when he starts off topic discussions in other peoples threads about how much they suck or cheat. I'd say only let him post in the Emperor boards, then at least we'll have some peace in the rest of the forum.Or, make a special Nav section, and he'll be the only visitor :P
VigilVirus Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 i recommend you do nothing to me but also that you enforce your wrath against all the people who provoke me, whom are always allowed to provoke me and nothing ever gets done to them for itbtw they even break way more rules than me a lot of the time ie: saying they are gonna kill me and that i am a loser in real life etc. you don't see me taking personal shots like that, i just post the factsWhat I think is that a person shouldn't be able to vote in a thread that rates of whether to ban him or not ;D
Anathema Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 What Nav does is trolling. He deliberately tries to incite flames. This kind of stuff isn't allowed on some boards, but apparently it is allowed here.
undsputed Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 undsputed has a good idea on what rogue voted for =)
Frodo Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 I voted nothing, because honestly, if you hate him so much, then just put him on your ignore list. That way, if you don't like him, you won't see his posts. It is a much better method than banning someone. Because he sometimes does post good things, so just give him another chance.
rogue1896 Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 well frodo, let's just say hypothetically that i pissed you off to no end. eventually you'd get pissed off and put me on your ignore list. that's what i did to nav. well, eventually curiousity WILL get the better of you b/c whenever you see a post by me you'd think it's probably some more slander or something. the ignore list was a good idea, but humans are just too weak to ignore something like this. i'll just say one more thing, do you all remember how quiet and peaceful it was while nav was permanently banned? remember the tranquility. we had quality posts without the interference of spam. i remember TMA had a shitload of psychological and theoretical posts. lol. then we had emprworm's riddles and his discussions about life and whatnot. it was NICE. peaceful. and all that because 'he' wasn't here. i, personally, want to return to those peaceful days.and yeah, i voted nav to the sandworms. but that was kinda obvious.
emprworm Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 i withhold my vote for now. i will wait another couple weeks to see.
rogue1896 Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 0 for let him post in one thread.2 for let him post in one section.6 for send him to the worms.4 for do nothing.
Frodo Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 2 for stick to one board, 6 for ban him, and 4 for let him be. no one has voted to let him only post in 1 thread.
Frodo Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 now 7 for ban him, i bet when i wake up tommorow there will be 20 more votes, and 15 more replies. I think this will be a popular topic and will turn into a flame war and be locked. :)
rogue1896 Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 2 votes for this thread about to be locked. it's obvious isn't it? nav'll come on saying something about us who voted to ban him, someone will have a comeback, and then nav'll call him a n00b and the cycle will continue until gob or another mod comes online and locks it. i give this thread a maximum of a full day from now to stay open.
Inoculator9 Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 I'd recommend limiting his use to one board. He does deserve a chance, I suppose. I hate his conduct, but I think the ban and now restrictions would scare him back into line. And he may improve so, I wouold recommend limiting him to the general boards or emperor boards to test his conduct under restricted settings.
GhostHunter Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 Hes had many chances before and after he got banned, its been pushed to far now.
Inoculator9 Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 Nav was banned only a month or so after I joined so I don't know first hand his actions.
Andrew Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 maybe we could allow him to post anywhere, but we screen his posts and delete anything that remotely resembles anything that will make people go crazy.(joking)i say ban him if he still is a problem.
Recommended Posts