Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

But it already has soul. Ah, I've forgotten that you think about yourself as just couple of flesh, Earthnuker.

"If you were forced to kill either a chicken or an egg, wich would you kill"

I think that human has bigger right to live than a chicken.

Posted

Of course human, but if you mean with that "unsentient egg" human embryo, they are equal for me.

Soul is source of "self". It makes you superior to other lifeforms. Difference between ape and human is genetically only 0,3 %. Soul makes you able to write your next argument here.

Posted

Most of our DNA is latent and rudimental, and the amount of active DNA we share with apes is much smaller- though it is undetermined how large that percentage is.

Can an embryo think of an argument for this topic? Then how can you say an embryo has a soul?

Posted

Soul is a creator. Linked with brain, but because brain isn't grown it doesn't mean it's an animal. Would you kill for medical purposes just born baby? It can't think too, but has soul and it IS human, which can't be killed even by atheistic rules.

Posted

Embryos are not born babies, and babies have brains and are sentient.

If I pluck a hair out of my head, it is human- does that mean that one hair of mine is equal to a human being?

Posted

When you prove a soul exists, we can talk about it. A lot can be explained by our feelings, chemicals, hormones, etc. And I think soul a ways back was used for a metaphorical sense more often (like judging a person by "the blackness of the soul").

Posted

A hair has the potential to become biomatter for a species.

When you think of cloning you think of cloning an entire person. I don't think I'd approve of this, but cloning limbs is totally alright.

Posted

So, to clone just part of body should be acceptable, but how we know which part makes human intelligent being?

"Embryos are not born babies, and babies have brains and are sentient."

"Sentient= Self aware, able to think and make decisions"

Earthnuker, when you were born, you had awared yourself?

Posted

So, to clone just part of body should be acceptable, but how we know which part makes human intelligent being?

What do you mean. Do you mean that that if a cloned limb is attached to another person, we may attaching a sentient arm to someone?

Posted

The brain makes us intelligent ::) If a soul exists, then wouldn't the head part be associated with the brain (what makes us intelligent)?

If you lose your arm, you become less of a human physically, but not necessarily mentally. Some can't take the loss of a limb and go nuts, some deal with it.

Posted

the brain is you the rest is just a meat machine simple as that. You die you live it makes no difference. Cloning will generate exciting new possibilities. Embrace it or be left behind.

Posted

He said that technology would be better. Cybernetics would be great, but thats just as far away, technologically as cloning replacement limbs. If cybernetics were a viable solution I'd support it rather then cloning.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.