Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That particle accelerator is going to be sweet thought. And it could answer questions about the nature of gravity itself. That's worth the price of earth I'd say.

Posted

Read about it before. The lawsuit is news, though.

And relax, surfer dude says we're going to be fine:

"For comparison, I think the chances are higher that LHC will see some of these particles than it is that the LHC will see superparticles, extra dimensions, or micro black holes as predicted by string theory. I hope to get more (and different) predictions, with more confidence, out of this E8 Theory over the next year, before the LHC comes online."
Posted

Reminds me of the series finale of lex.

Vaiyo A-O.

A Home Va Ya Ray.

Vaiyo A-Rah.

Jerhume Brunnen-G!"

hehe

Wow, major flashback to scifi channeling during the summers.

Anyway, like mentioned before, some sort of explanation for gravity would be awesome if it happened in my time. The nature of it boggles the mind (without getting into the natures of the universe, which boggle enough of their own).

Posted

Anyway, like mentioned before, some sort of explanation for gravity would be awesome if it happened in my time. The nature of it boggles the mind (without getting into the natures of the universe, which boggle enough of their own).

How do you think, what is a more difficult question, How does Universe work? or How does our mind work?

Posted

In unrelated news, UK Research Funding for Theoretical Physicists has been cut, allegedly because they failed to prove it would benefit the economy.

(Will they be taking their revenge?)

Posted

Because it can help us to unlock the secrets of the universe. You'd need a real physicist to tell you all the benefits but there will be a lot.

Posted

Because it can help us to unlock the secrets of the universe. You'd need a real physicist to tell you all the benefits but there will be a lot.

Someone who studies physics told me that it would be beneficial but not worth the risk of the planet being destroyed.

Posted

Someone who studies physics told me that it would be beneficial but not worth the risk of the planet being destroyed.

What did they say the benefits were? And what did they say was the realistic probability of it going tits up? I'd be very interested to know an experts opinion.

Posted

Someone who studies physics told me that it would be beneficial but not worth the risk of the planet being destroyed.

I've only just realised how vague this statement is!

Posted

What did they say the benefits were? And what did they say was the realistic probability of it going tits up? I'd be very interested to know an experts opinion.

I don't remember and I don't feel like going through the trouble of finding out.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.