Wolf Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 What was the voting record on both referendums? Were there any clear majorities, wide margins of victory/defeat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 ACElethal:A columnist at National Post or something wrote an article about selling PEI to the Japanese since they love anne so much. He got in a lot of shit and so on. :)And I never read Anne, although there is a 40 or so year old book of it in my house.@emprworm:I'm sorry but were not all lazy people outside of Alberta. ::)Unless you were only referring to these types of people:Nice to think that you are funding suzie and stacy, an out of work lesbian couple with 4 kids sucking off the tax system, their next methodone hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SurlyPIG Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 Alas, I've never read it either. It's more of a girl's book. I never even watched the CBC miniseries.Wolf, the first referendum (1980) was 59.56% against vs 40.44% in favour. The second (1995) was 50.58% against vs 49.42% in favour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 That is a ridiculously small margin of victory, probably smaller than the margin of error? They should hold another referendum to see if attitudes have changed sufficiently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SurlyPIG Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 It wasn't a statistical poll. There is no margin of error in a referendum. Those who don't vote waive their say in the matter.Another referendum would currently fail. The 1995 referendum was the only one that had any hope of succeeding, and it failed by the slimmest of margins. Since then, the Quebec Premier Lucien Bouchard, who was arguably the most responsible for building separatism to the extent it existed, stepped down, moved to the US and was replaced by a guy mostly regarded as a dud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
otheymzefedaykin Posted May 24, 2004 Share Posted May 24, 2004 I just think that Canada without Quebec, will be not Canada ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shygirl4 Posted May 25, 2004 Share Posted May 25, 2004 I didnt know what PEI was until you mentioned anne , now I know :) I have the video box set, and watch it all the time, the one with megan folllows, if I was to visit Canada, I would want to see PEI first, before any other part of Canada.Now back to topic.As a outsider I would say No to seperation, the margin is close at 51/49, but its still a lot of people who dont want to see Canada devided, im probably biased, as I dont like the french. :)Shy ::) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Posted May 25, 2004 Share Posted May 25, 2004 Quebec separating would mess Canada and Quebec up seriously.Someone did a presentation on Anne this spring in my ENG 381 class.bwhaha, I have relatives that live in Annes Land!Visiting the grave, house and farm etc, are all very fun things to do (for anne fans).They even have Anne pop (or juice I forget, but it is pretty good, got a free sample.)Virtual tour of the house:http://www.gov.pe.ca/greengables/index.php3The anne of green gables musical is supposed to be really good too. (usually sells out)http://www.confederationcentre.com/eventdetail.asp?eventID=330 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted May 25, 2004 Share Posted May 25, 2004 Take it outside you two...For the record, I was only giving Emprworm a taste of his own medicine. Since he enjoys emotional soapbox speeches so much, I wondered how he would feel if I used his own type of rhethoric against him.But I also ended up proving a point that conservatives often try to deny: The fact that the Right is the side of the wealthy, of the rich and powerful, while the Left is the side of the poor, of the oppressed and exploited. The little war between me and Emprworm is also an excellent example of class struggle...But anyway, I don't want to take this thread off-topic. Carry on. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemafakei Posted May 25, 2004 Share Posted May 25, 2004 Margin for error in the context of referenda includes such factors as temporary opinions of voters - those whononly just support one or the other and might the next day pick the other option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Posted May 25, 2004 Share Posted May 25, 2004 How is this war between you and Emprworm representative of the class strugge? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted May 26, 2004 Author Share Posted May 26, 2004 For the record, I was only giving Emprworm a taste of his own medicine. Since he enjoys emotional soapbox speeches so much, I wondered how he would feel if I used his own type of rhethoric against him.But I also ended up proving a point that conservatives often try to deny: The fact that the Right is the side of the wealthy, of the rich and powerful, while the Left is the side of the poor, of the oppressed and exploited. The little war between me and Emprworm is also an excellent example of class struggle...But anyway, I don't want to take this thread off-topic. Carry on. :) problem is that I've already shown that the world's richest people favor the side of the left, and favored it as they were aquiring wealth. (i.e. they weren't on the right, got wealthy, and then moved to the left) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 Yes....Ralpth Nader really wants to screw the poor ::) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 Emigrant not in the manner of a refugee, so much as a colonist.in slovak traditional concept... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ordos45 Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 Those who are on the left, are the biggest exploiters of all.Oh...so that's why Mahatama Gandhi gave up all his money, his career, and lived in abject poverty trying to peacefully resist British occupation of his homeland! At least by your logic, he is on the Left, thus this historic man exploited the people greatly! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 In Johnson's History of the 20th century was one nice quote by Gandhi's speaker, like "Gandhi's poorness is going to ruin us" ;D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ordos45 Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 Apparently it didn't. But nice quote :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted May 27, 2004 Author Share Posted May 27, 2004 Oh...so that's why Mahatama Gandhi gave up all his money, his career, and lived in abject poverty trying to peacefully resist British occupation of his homeland! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ordos45 Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 Ah the Left Wing Billionaire instead of the Left Wing Poverty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted May 27, 2004 Author Share Posted May 27, 2004 there's too many left wing billionaires on this planet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 I can think of something else we've got too much of as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barbarossa Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 Getting back to the subject.....By granting Quebec it's independence would'nt you be effectively seperating canada?What would the Provinces to the far east do, join the U.S? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted May 27, 2004 Author Share Posted May 27, 2004 no, i believe i would be liberating Canada ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted May 27, 2004 Share Posted May 27, 2004 And what does your wife think about this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted May 27, 2004 Author Share Posted May 27, 2004 And what does your wife think about this?in full agreement. she tells me that Quebec is like a seperate nation within a nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.