Caid Ivik Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 Do you think USA will strike even if new resolution enabling other solution than diplomatic would be...:1. ...vetoed?2. ...disagreed by majority in Security Council?Serious answers please, no "they are idiots, they do everything they want" ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 The way things are looking now, France and Russia won't need to use veto right.I don't think the US will back down if the majority of the security council is against it. As long as they still got support from some countries, the war will happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted March 11, 2003 Share Posted March 11, 2003 the US will strike unless one of two things happen:Saddam disarmsSaddam flees the country in exile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobalopper Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 I don't think the vote will matter. In my eyes the US doesn't want to have to rely on the UN for its national security. The problem with the UN is that everyone there is looking out for themselves so issues like this are always going to be hard to pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ordos45 Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 Its beginning to remind me of its predecessor, the League of Nations. If you ever find copies of their preceedings shortly after Hitler invaded Poland and France and Britain declaring war on Germany, they make no mention of a war going on.As for the question at hand, yes. I seriously doubt we're going to withdraw everything we've sent over there at a cost almost as much as a war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 America will ignore the UN if it disagrees and praise it if it does. Either way, it shall attack and there's nothing we can do about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nampigai Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 with all the mobilising wich costs a fortune I doubt that the US would just pack and go home even if Saddam dissarms, I believe I read somewhere that it's no longer enough to disarm Saddam needs to leave too. I believe that there's no longer any use of the UN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 the US will strike unless one of two things happen:Saddam disarmsSaddam flees the country in exileThis is what I believe but I hope they don't strike without UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 I hope they DO strike without UK. Even better is no strike at all but that's another topic... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nampigai Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 the US will strike unless one of two things happen:Saddam disarmsSaddam flees the country in exileThis is what I believe but I hope they don't strike without UKI believe mr. Blair just got aided by the US in this matter. mr. Rumsfeld said that the US easily could do the campaign alone, leaving mr. Blair with his honour intact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 If they strike on their own they will look stupid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 They already do now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 With his honour intact!!!He will look a fool if they dont attack with UK as Tony Blair has been acting the right way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 If they strike on their own they will look stupid Even better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nampigai Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 he would look like a fool if his government would fall too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobalopper Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 Hey don't forget Australia! :)Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Kuwait are all allowing US troops to buildup now too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeLeto Posted March 12, 2003 Share Posted March 12, 2003 the US will strike unless one of two things happen:Saddam disarmsSaddam flees the country in exile1. He is disarming. ::)2. Why? It is HIS country...Saddam would probably like Bush to flee in exile too, but it doesn't mean he has too. ::) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted March 13, 2003 Author Share Posted March 13, 2003 That, what is ment in word "disarm" is based on showing were all previously found WMDs are or were, with showing an evidence of their and their producing facilities' destruction. I hope you understand fact he had such weapons, which were found by UN inspectors, and also he was orderred to destroy them, what he rejected and dismissed inspections until this year.About the second statemen, why you say HIS country? Sorry, but if he want to be in UN, than he should stop with such feudal thinkings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeLeto Posted March 13, 2003 Share Posted March 13, 2003 Iraq actually is a member of the UN...the only country that isn't is Vatican City. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted March 13, 2003 Author Share Posted March 13, 2003 I know Iraq is in, and because of that he should do what UN resolutions command.In UN aren't more separate countries, i.e. Switzerland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeLeto Posted March 13, 2003 Share Posted March 13, 2003 Actually, Switzerland just joined recently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted March 13, 2003 Share Posted March 13, 2003 What's wrong with feudal thinking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warlord Ripskar Posted March 13, 2003 Share Posted March 13, 2003 Blair is done for whatever he does. If he backs down the Conservatives will eat him alive. If he goes through with it his own party will dispose of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rigel6669 Posted March 14, 2003 Share Posted March 14, 2003 America will ignore the UN if it disagrees and praise it if it does. That is exactly what the US governement said before submitting the resolution.Even if saddam left the country or when iraq is disarmed, the US will still attack iraq. In both cases they will find another excuse to save their faceThere is a big difference between what they say and what will be done.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowzeewee Posted March 15, 2003 Share Posted March 15, 2003 USA is just using the UN votes thingy as a shield for their attack,and getting the countries that depend on USA-via-their-country-trade heavily to vote.....obviously that is really stupid.USA will strike no matter what.They actually just want their oil fieldsUSA will strike unless Saddam destroys ALL his oil fields Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.