Gobalopper Posted February 18, 2003 Author Share Posted February 18, 2003 They have killed or captured a lot of terrorists since 9/11 and for all we know Osama could be dead already too. Those people did have the right to rebel and just because they didn't have military support from the rest of the world doesn't make it wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 Well he could very well be dead, but what would be really sick is that he lives in a New York apartment. That would make some question our security.Not likely... I personally think he's enjoying himself on a tropical island somewhere... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 I saw those Iraqis on the Dutch television. It was on the first channel, around 18:15 GMTAnd about that rebellion:http://indymedia.ie/cgi-bin/newswire.cgi?id=29498&start=0On top of that at the end of the Gulf War I, when Bush (on TV) encouraged the Iraqisto rise up in rebellion, then when it looked like they were on the verge of oustingSaddam, the US Admin suddenly gave permission for the Iraqi army to fly theirown (Iraqi) helicopters. Result: Rebellion quickly crushed. The folks in the armyand the intelligence service would have been acutely aware that this would be theoutcome. So why did they do it. To leave Saddam in place. Heck if democracy broke outit could spread all over the Arab world, and then the people would demand a fairprice for their oil. The purpose now is to put in their own obedient dictator-anything but liberation!I'm surprised you missed that...LOL! that is the biggest load of hokey I've read yet. The US wanted to finish the job, it was the UN.... THE UNITED NATIONS that demanded the US cease firing. THe US was willing and fully prepared to continue until Sadaam is removed! DOn't blame the US for that mistake. That was the brainchild of your precious EU and UN for that one.Q: WHY WAS SADDAM HUSSEIN LEFT IN POWER AFTER DESERT STORM IN 1991 WHEN THE US WANTED TO FINISH THE JOB WHY DIDNT THEY?A: UN RESOLUTION 687. http://www.caabu.org/press/documents/unscr-resolution-687.html THE UNITED NATIONS ONCE AGAIN DEMONSTRATING THEIR UTTER FAILURES IN WORLD POLITICS...NOW REAPING WHAT THEY SOWED.And once again in 2003 SOME (a minority thankfully) are trying to repeat the mistakes of 1991. Thankfully the majority of the UN this time around sees their mistake in 1991 demanding the US implement a cease fire (when the US should have finished the job that the UN didn't want them too) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 Same scandal was attack on Jugoslavia in 1999. Whole world closed eyes over tyranny in Kosovo and when USA ignored UN and downed Milosevic, all nations found it was good thing. They should do same with Saddam, when he was killing his own, but that will was never so tough as today is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 The attack on Yugoslavia was just as wrong. It brought nothing but misery to the whole country. And Milosevic only began his mass ethnic cleansings as a RESULT of the US attacks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 Those murders were before the attack, EdricO. Do you think he was trying to enrage US? To CALL them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 Of course not. That's why he only let loose his madness when he had nothing left to lose... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 So do you think he wanted to fight US just because he hasn't seen other way to bring his country from misery? US capitalism rebuilds always their conquests, that's true... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 Errr, Milosevic never had any intention to improve the living standards in his country... He never had any intention to fight the US, either. (obviously, since he knew he would lose)US capitalism rebuilds their conquests into countries as corrupt and socially unjust as all other capitalist states. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 Every country can be considered unjust. Justice isn't morale, it is relative.Milosevic was an idiot. A nationalist, what is highest idiocy possible in this world. Then he made some mess and nearly caused other Balkan War, not in Bosnia, but in Kosovo, Albania and Macedonia. And only USA had enough courage to stop him. They have new investment places now - but that you can call a reward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobalopper Posted February 19, 2003 Author Share Posted February 19, 2003 http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021803/content/from.guest.html:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobalopper Posted February 19, 2003 Author Share Posted February 19, 2003 Iraq scientist says Saddam hiding arms undergroundGermany providing sodium cyanide to North Korea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 That rush limbaugh link is hilarious, are they real protestors actually protesting them, or edited or what? So funnny... :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobalopper Posted February 19, 2003 Author Share Posted February 19, 2003 http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021803/content/across_the_fruited_plain.guest.htmlThe above is the audio link where the guy called into the show. They actually went to one of the protests with those signs. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021803/content/from.guest.htmlWOW! those pics are hillarious....how they survive that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 lol read the sign in the background too! :D haha, now i wish i was at the war protests. Darn!!! I coulda made a sign too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 interesting....VERY interesting....Report: German Intelligence Suppressed Evidence Of Iraqi Smallpox?Feb 18, 2003German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reported Feb. 16 that the German government for months intentionally suppressed evidence that Iraq possesses supplies of smallpox.The United Nations completed its smallpox eradication program in the early 1970s. In theory, no samples of the deadly virus exist anywhere in the world, aside from a handful of high-security government labs -- where they are kept specifically for research purposes. Smallpox could prove a particularly effective battlefield or terrorist weapon, because it is easily communicable and global inoculations against the virus were halted 25 years ago. According to the report, the German Health Ministry claimed in an internal report in August 2002 that German intelligence knew of smallpox being stored in Iraq and North Korea. Health officials estimated that up to 20 million Germans could die in a smallpox attack, and called for immediate expansion of Germany's vaccine supplies. Health Minister Ulla Schmidt referred to portions of the internal report in November testimony to the Bundestag budget committee, but notably omitted any reference to Iraq or potential casualties. The Ministry report apparently lay dormant until the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung article on Feb. 16. The Health Ministry since has confirmed the existence of the document, but claimed its "drastic language" was geared to push for additional funding for vaccines.Berlin has been among the world's most anti-war governments -- to such a point that it has poisoned Germany's relations with the United States.If the information proves true, it would indicate that the German government has actively denied the United Nations and its allies information about the existence of an Iraqi WMD program while helping to lead the global anti-war crusade. Such a development could hasten the end of Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's political career and likely trigger early elections in Germany.Such a revelation also would be likely to tilt anti-war sentiment in Europe and could speed the commencement of U.S. military operations against Iraq. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobalopper Posted February 19, 2003 Author Share Posted February 19, 2003 http://www.brain-terminal.com/articles/video/peace-protest.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 just shows the lunacy of the white caucasion euro/american anti-war nuts.of course, the Iraqi people have a much different view then the white caucasion euro/americans who want to keep them oppressed and enslaved.Typical white man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 Emprworm, I've counted some 10 posts of yours which say that exact same thing, over and over again.I already replied to it once, and I see no need to do so again for every time you post it.Will you stop spamming please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 Oh, and one more thing... I wonder why those pro-war and pro-mass murder protestors joined the ANTI-war protests just to mock them instead of rallying up their own?Ah, I think I know: Because no one else would join their pro-genocide rallies in favour of war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caid Ivik Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 There is no war yet. But these protesters might push USA to it. When Saddam sees it, he can only laugh on primary effect of that army on his border - intimidation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dude_Doc Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 Why can't they march with signs of "Saddam, leave Iraq"? I think swede-protesters are insane, they walk around with palestinian flags (okay, nothing wrong with that but: ) and with signs with this text: "Bomb Israel instead of Iraq". Is this justice all of a sudden? Maybe they'd supported Hitler too? If Saddam leaves, then there would be no war. Besides that, the anti-war marches also have many communists in them, with signs like: "Bomb America", "Drop Bush not Bombs" and "Thanks God I am not an American". I am really ashamed when I see them on the TV and in the newspaper... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nampigai Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 If you look at the Arabic world they can't understand why the US support Israel in killing the Palestinian. and I actually understand them. I've said before that I do not support terrorism but the Israelli government aren't doing a good job with palestinians IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted February 19, 2003 Share Posted February 19, 2003 Why can't they march with signs of "Saddam, leave Iraq"? I think swede-protesters are insane, they walk around with palestinian flags (okay, nothing wrong with that but: ) and with signs with this text: "Bomb Israel instead of Iraq". Is this justice all of a sudden? Maybe they'd supported Hitler too? If Saddam leaves, then there would be no war. Besides that, the anti-war marches also have many communists in them, with signs like: "Bomb America", "Drop Bush not Bombs" and "Thanks God I am not an American". I am really ashamed when I see them on the TV and in the newspaper...yea, that is pretty sad. people who are protesting the war are exposing themselves a bit here. ON the outside they are claiming the reason for their protest is because they care about all the innocent people of Iraq.Hardly.They protest because they are anti-Bush, anti-USA, anti-Israel ....just plain ANTI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.