Jump to content

Crikey!

Dunenewt

By Dunenewt
in General

 Share

Recommended Posts

Kiyouta

Kiyouta

Posted
Posted

Well i'd hardly call ONE MiG-25R Foxbat-B buried under the sand an airforce.

Operation: Iraqi Freedom

Pffft... aren't they supposed to name operations using code names, using words that are not supposed to describe what they are actually seeking to achieve!? Oh wait... sorry ignore that, my bad, no error there.

thomas

thomas

Posted
Posted

read what I wrote, then reply. . .

I said weapons systems wise, the F-14 carrys six pheonix missles

AIM-54 Phoenix is a long-range air-to-air missile with range of 150 km

Dunenewt

Dunenewt

Posted
  • Author
Posted

the F-14 can simultaneously track 24 targets, ok i concede, you're right ;).  Super Tomcat is better though.  They look amazing and their performance must be as well.

Jack Leaf

Jack Leaf

Posted
Posted

Su-25 is dated plane and Mig-25 is becoming older everyday. And if America had dared to send their new Raptors (Aren't they ready now?) to Iraq, none of those planes would have had a damn chance.

Dunenewt

Dunenewt

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The F-22 Raptor isn't an all amazing plane.  Compared to 30 year old planes it maybe but not against modern planes such as the Mig 35 or Eurofighter.

Barbarossa

Barbarossa

Posted
Posted

Well, I think most of us can agree to one thing the euro-fighter SUCKS.

although that is an impressive picture.

f22.jpgeurofighter-ef20007.jpg

but then again theres always pilot error....LOL ;D

wrongbutton.jpg

hehehehe.......

Dunenewt

Dunenewt

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The Typhoon is half the price of the Raptor and is a better plane with more speed and manoverability.  Barbarossa, you obviously have no idea of what you're on about.

JSF is going to be a flop even with its Rolls-Royce engines because its too fat.

Seal89999

Seal89999

Posted
Posted

Im gonna join the Raptor group....I  think that fighter is far superior to that mig or that other fighter. Raptor is a very good plane......it cost more but you get your moneys worth.

thomas

thomas

Posted
Posted

I wanted to fly the commanche but then the military withdrew it's contract . . .  :'(

I guess I wanna go into the navy and fly X-35(I think that's the number) ,the harriers successor

Seal89999

Seal89999

Posted
Posted

The commanche or something very similar will return.....that was a great idea..it just cost alot of money. And the people paying the bills ran out of patience. They couldent get it perfect in time...so it got the axe. Not very cool...looks like it would have been my favorite aircraft if it were completed.

The idea will arise again and so will the project...the commanche will be resurected....

Dunenewt

Dunenewt

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The Typhoon can fly in clouds! I've seen them fly in clouds if you need proof! It's the X-35 but will become the F-35 when it enters operational service AFAIK, but in Britain it is known as the JCA (Joint Combat Aircraft) and it hasn't been given any designations yet.

The MiG 42 or Su-37 Berkut are far superior to the Raptor as well.  The X-35 as I have said many times before, is too fat to take off vertically.

Sard Elite: I think the US Army are still getting some Comanches aren't they? I thought it wsa just the USAF that had cancelled them?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.