Traditionally, there have been only two options to bring about a form of Socialism in a Capitalist society - Revolution and Reform. For an armed Working Class revolution to succeed, it needs two things: Support of the Military, and Central Leadership. Historically, this has been a success in all but the society produced post-revolution; a Quasi-Totalitarian Military Dictatorship under a red banner, rather than a truly Socialist society. In this respect, I differ from many of my Anarchist comrades by being largely against Revolution on a large scale. There is often a time for a Revolution, but almost never on the scale of a massive empire such as that of Russia or America. Then, there's Reform. For one thing, 50 years of governmental and economic reform lasts a damn long time, and the results aren't very different than before, and can almost never succeed thanks to our good friend, "Corporate Interests". Most of the time, Socialist reform in the government ends up with an odd compromise between Capitalism and Socialism, Sweden being an obvious example. I'm also against this, for the most part. Instead, I prefer a lesser known method: Syndicalism. Work within a Capitalist economy peacefully, with Worker's self management and independent companies run democratically by the whole of its workers. Provide the people with an alternative to capitalism, and manage to out-compete the old Capitalist institutions. I recognize that this has some serious faults, but I think it's a better alternative than the other two. For one thing, it's peaceful, and doesn't need the leadership of a Bolshevist "Vanguard party", or reliance in the Government.