Jump to content

Evolution and Creation

Inoculator9

By Inoculator9
in General

 Share

Recommended Posts

Edric O

Edric O

Posted
Posted

Pointybum, not everyone is like you. Obviously YOU can live without religion (otherwise you wouldn't be an atheist...). But not everyone can. Especially people living miserable lives with no hope of ever getting better.

I think it would be wrong to say that if a christian did kill then they werent a true christian, they didnt committ to their faith properly etc.

How can someone who completely ignores the basic laws of Christianity be called a true Christian? I'm not talking about hazy phrases that can be interpreted in different ways. I'm talking about a direct, obvious order from God. Anyone who ignores it is not a Christian.

Repoman:

all you have to do to get a person to believe in what you say is to create the right environment for it. I believe it is very difficult for someone to completely change his belief system but not impossible. Therefore i cannot give up trying to create that environment for people.

That is called manipulation. You are trying to manipulate people into believing what YOU WANT them to believe! >:(

You are not an advocate for multiculturlism. You show extreme intolerance for religion. You said it yourself that you hate it!

Acriku, if I didn't think Christianity is the better religion then how could I be a christian?

You never mentioned the other instincts you were taking out. If violence is one of them, then your world would indeed be a peaceful one. But the lack of religion wouldn't have anything to do with it!

It's like if I removed Pepsi and the human instinct for violence at the same time, and then claimed that a world without Pepsi is a world without violence! Ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Acriku

Acriku

Posted
Posted

You have a God with a son. That's the major difference :)

Aye, sad it is that people alike divided from one man.

Pointy, yes field triiiiip! :) It would solve a lot of problems, but I don't think proving religion wrong would be a good thing in this world ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Edric O

Edric O

Posted
Posted

That means all religion - it sounds very zombiefied but I am trying to get behind the part before religion shaped mankind. A time machine trip, if you like. What would the world be like then?

That is an impossible question. The effects of religion on history are too many to count, and extremely complex. Religion is inseparable from history.

Without religion, civilization would be immensely different from what we see today. It is impossible to predict what it would be like. Too many factors are involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sneakgab

Sneakgab

Posted
Posted

The problem with the evelution theory is simply: where did it all begin?

People talk about the positive/ anti matter theory to bring in a very beggining but where did that matter come from?

According to science, nothing can simply be created or destroyed... so science basically proves that the current evelution theory is incorrect... perhaps science will one day explain the origin of the universe but that day has not come yet...

I mean of course thing's evolved, but where did Earth come from? some say that it was just asteroids in space smacking each other and that sort of thing... but where did the asteroids come from? some say from certain nebulae. But where did the nebulae come from? some say they're gasses being pulled around by gravity (sorry forgot this step:D). But where did the gasses come from or the gravitational pull?. some say the first thing came from the matter/anti matter and an imbalance which caused the matter, simply put, to beat the anti matter

But where did the matter come from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
emprworm

emprworm

Posted
Posted

Repoman, since you last response to me was dignified and reasonable, I will once again open dialoge with you.

The problem that you have is that you would argue the point no matter how comprehensive the evidence in front of you as unfortantly you would have to admit that everything that you have belived in has been a lie and you fell for it hook line and sinker.

What "comprehensive evidence" are you referring to and of what? If you are going to say cross-special evolution is an empirical fact, then you bought the deception, not me.

What frustrates me is that you say that you have proven mathematically and emprically subjects that you have quite clearly not.Do you know the difference between evidence and opinion??? You have them clearly confused. Religion is based on opinion and Evoultion is based on fact.

Yes I did prove it empirically and mathematically. Here let me show you:

Given Volume of a Vessel:

150 Meters x 25 Meters 15 Meters = total volume 56,250 cubic meters. total amount of animals needed to be on the the vessel = appx 17500 x 2 (two of each land species) = approximately 35000

Average size of an earth land animal = about the size of a sheep

result = not even 75% of the space capacity of said vessel would be needed to hold the animals

Could a ship given the above dimensions hold 2 of every land species on earth on board?

Answer: Yes, empirically proven.

Do you know what emprical means?? It means results based on experiments. Mathematically is is possible to build a Arc that big but noone is arguing that point. What experiments were carried out to get your emprical evidence.

the ark would have been a bit smaller than the titanic. Many ships are that size, they exist now and are observable. Scientific records list the number of land species on earth, plenty of room to fit them all on one ship. (i.e you would have only 2 dogs not 2 of each kind of dog- we are talking species here)

"I also showed that it is universally recognized amongst the scientific community that there was once a world-wide flood."

These are child's arguments mate. Time and time again i have brought up the inconsistancies within your arguments yet you ignore and continue on as if they were never pointed out.

LOL. Are you denying here before everyone in this room that the universal scientific community does not think there was once a world-wide flood? (by universal I mean both evolutionary and creationist- not every single person, but the overwhelming majority in both camps) I want a yes or no here before I proceed.

Do you know how hard it is to have a therory that contradicts everything that is taught in the world and yet still succeed??? Evolution did this and now is taught in schools because it is proven whereas before this the creationist therory was taught.

cross-special evolution has zero...count em zero... pieces of evidence to back it up. Or are you going to name some and perhaps get a nobel prize? Just a bunch of hodge podge. In fact, the history of evolutionary science is wraught with fraud and deception. Go back in this thread and look at one example I gave of the flying turkey dinosaur- fraud that was propogated by national geographic just 2 years ago. Total embarrassment. That is how DESPERATE evolutionists are to get their hands on real evidence, because they HAVE NONE. Desperation is never a sign that you have plenty, but a sign that you have little. No branch of science today is more desperate for evidence then evolution.

Or are you going to start naming this so-called evidence?

Evolution is fact. It is not a therory! It is proven!How much evidence do you need to see before you believe it??

uh...lets go with just one piece of solid evidence for starters.

How many holes in religion need to be pointed out before you see it for the fabrication that it is.

did you point one out? I noticed a lot of generalized complaining, but no specific evidence or counterevidence.

Your attempt to dodge me on this thread will only expose your lack of evidence with you argument.

i dodge poorly constructed arguments that lack evidence or support for their claims. Not because I am unable to respond, but because I dont like wasting my time. No offense mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Acriku

Acriku

Posted
Posted

Sneak, science does not say nothing can be created or destroyed. Maybe energy, but certainly not nothing. Also, and this isn't my argument but a ponder, why can't anything just pop into existence, come out of nowhere? We don't know the rules of the universe, only the rules that apply to earth. Now my argument is, just because we don't have the understanding or the proof yet, does not mean it is wrong. We are very primitive in the ways of knowledge of our surroundings, hell we don't know about more than half of our own world. We couldn't understand why apples fell until Newton, and now we are just looking for a Newton of evolution.

And emprworm, approximating data doesn't prove it fully. That's where you err my friend. And please state where it says in the bible it is that many meters, you said it before but I forgot.

And empr, they may agree on a worldwide flood, but it is when is where they disagree on. When noah was around? Or when dinos roamed the earth? Or when they died? etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TMA_1

TMA_1

Posted
Posted

or prehaps your opinions on it dont give any evidance behind the problem.lol The big bang just turned the universe's energy into matter. All matter is, is energy. Simple as that. Even then science cant prove that. its all based on faith and good guesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
emprworm

emprworm

Posted
Posted

why can't anything just pop into existence, come out of nowhere? We don't know the rules of the universe, only the rules that apply to earth.

lol. this is "science?" har har. If you are going to accept this, then you have absolutely no scientific basis upon which to discredit any and all superstitious claim ever given.

what is more 'scientific' claim?:

Water turns to wine (the physical properties of already existing matter change)

A universe of 1 x 10 ^ 70 KG just pops into existence via ex-nihlo from nothing (matter that was not pre-existing suddenly exists).

And a 'scientist' is going to call me superstitious for believing the former?

Lol!!

I think i know who the superstitious one is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.