Dante Posted June 27, 2011 Share Posted June 27, 2011 Far more likely we'd utilise technology to overcome our newfound weaknesses. Which is more likely, that we'd paddle around in a marshy environment or learn to build better rafts?Also, the diagram specifies evolution, not atheism. Further, there is no one unifying "atheist ideology."I'm afraid that third point would need a bit more clarification (in another topic, most likely, though I confess it doesn't really interest me). If it's saying that the cosmos requires that its cause be ongoing in order to prevent its destruction then that seems like little more than assumption to me.And yes, Curt, those would be GIR and Almighty Tallest Purple.I was going to use Pinky and the Brain, but that can wait for another time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.