Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, paul, are you saying that a game is a rip-off of Emperor just because it has the same number of playable armies? Riiiiiight... ::)

Westwood made YR because RA2 sold so d@mn well. Besides, YR is NOTHING like Emperor. It's a totally different style of RTS.

And I happen to like YR better than Emp.

Posted

But as this is a dune site then the arguement is going 2 b biased

PS:E:b4d is better no matter wot Arbites says

PPS:I agree wif Paul up2 a certain point

cos the whole C&C series is a con on the whole of the Dune series

It is all based on Dune2 the original RTS game.

Posted

It's not a ripp-off, only that the games have the same basic principes. Then all games are ripp-off of the first person who developed the term 'game'

Posted

ehm.... i agree with the thing that yuri's revenge is not a ripp off..... i only want to tell you that ra2 is made by different people than emperor..... ra2 has been created by RA fans....

Posted

Both RA2 and Emp were made by Westwood, so YR can't be a ripoff.

Paul, by your logic Emperor is a ripoff from Starcraft... Which we all know is a stupid idea.

Just because I like YR (and I mean YR, although RA2 comes close) better than Emp doesn't mean I don't like this game, too! Besides, I also like Tiberian Sun better than YR. Tib Sun (+/- Firestorm) is my favourite game of all time. But even though I think it's much better than anything else, I don't play it as much as the newer games any more... No matter how good a game is, you're still hooked by the newer ones eventually.

Posted

What a stupid magazine is that! TS is a good game, a whole new graphics interface + good and fun missions. And also good units and nice type of terrains. No, don't touch TS, cause it is one of my favorite games, and sorry TS, but Emperor is better

Posted

YR is no way a con on emporer.  Just because they have tha=e same number of sides, does not mean Emperor was copied!!!!!  It is a totally different style of game, set in a different time AND is better than b4d.

Anyway, cuase we're talkin' bout b4d,

SARDUKAR RULE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted

well i have no problems with people who like TS... it's just i was very disappointed cuz i didn't like any of the units.... Mammoth Mk2... how did they think of it... yugh.... banshee fighter awfull... but to get back to the point... TS was just way less than i expected... the first TS screenshots were amazing.... 3d terrain and units.... many options like powering down certain buildings and stuff.... and none of those things were in the final version.... me and my first thought it was a joke or something....

Posted

Which scrshots did you saw then? I recognized all buildings, with some modifications (smaller lightpost, larger obelisk etc.)

Posted

Well, Who knows. The Westwood team wants to rip them selve's off by making some other games.  ::)

Btw, I think Tiberian sun doesnt follow the Original C&C story line. The units of Nod arent Original. Same goes for the GDI Side.

Posted

well.... the thing that makes me think RA2 is better than TS is because of the units.... there are few units in tiberian sun that i actually like.... RA2 has many original units...

Posted

"The Atreides machine gun post defence has a gatling gun... hmmm. That sounds awfully familiar"

Dating from C&C1, and the Rocket turret was even older - DII.

But does it matter? Gatlings are often deployed as defence!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.