Sardauker-Kirov Posted February 20, 2002 Posted February 20, 2002 Infantry in RA2 Is "Very" easy to crush. In BFD they dont cost much. But some Units are hard to crush with swift speed.I think they need to add that Garrison Feature to BFD too though. For the Hark's that is :P
Timenn Posted February 21, 2002 Posted February 21, 2002 In Emperor it is the first time that infantery plays a real role in the game, except for TS's Ghostalker, Cyborg Commando etc.
Aribites Posted February 21, 2002 Posted February 21, 2002 I agree with adding the garrison straregy (adding it to BFD), as it will make the game a lot more realistic.SARDUKAR RULE!!! :) 8) :) 8) :) 8)
Dunenewt Posted February 21, 2002 Posted February 21, 2002 interactive terrainits goodmore different civlian structures would b nicemayb featured in map of ArrakeenIx rule!!! ;D ;D ;D
Sardauker-Kirov Posted February 21, 2002 Posted February 21, 2002 The infantry cover is also a Very good idea of westwood. Alot of People uses the Advangtage of it.
jacobdouds Posted February 21, 2002 Posted February 21, 2002 If you are addicted to a game you have a serious problem
nemafakei Posted February 21, 2002 Posted February 21, 2002 Well... the idea sort of came from Dune II (mountains/rugged rock). And no-one else used it, except D2k and Emp.
Sardauker-Kirov Posted February 21, 2002 Posted February 21, 2002 Did they gave infantry cover bonuses then those sand dunes?
Timenn Posted February 22, 2002 Posted February 22, 2002 Did they gave infantry cover bonuses then those sand dunes? heh? ???
Dunenewt Posted February 22, 2002 Posted February 22, 2002 infantry Cover first existed as sumthing which was on rock and only passable 2 infantrythat was on Dune 2
paul_of_arrakis Posted February 23, 2002 Author Posted February 23, 2002 no there wasn't.is rock the only reason that emp is better than RA2 or are there many more. Now we need hard true facts stating
Edric O Posted February 23, 2002 Posted February 23, 2002 About the infantry issue:Infantry in RA2 was way better than in any other WW game, except maybe Emperor. But in YR, infantry plays a MUCH larger role. YR infantry is VERY useful! Not just better than in the original RA2, but also better than in Emperor.
paul_of_arrakis Posted February 23, 2002 Author Posted February 23, 2002 how can u insult us like this!!!!
Aribites Posted March 7, 2002 Posted March 7, 2002 Like this: Â YR infantry ARE better than those in Emperor:BFD!!!!!
Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 8, 2002 Posted March 8, 2002 ..... WAHAHAHAHA!!! *coughs*Excuse me. But in Yuri's revenge infantry is like walking Slaughtering cattle. Whats the use of infantry when it can be crushes so easily. While the Infantry in BFD can sit on infantry rock and destroy verhicles far more easily.
Aribites Posted March 11, 2002 Posted March 11, 2002 It is more realistic in YR!!!!! Â I mean, infantry are crushable in modern day war, aren't they????? Â Or am I not up with the latest news, uncrushable armour?????
Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 11, 2002 Posted March 11, 2002 Well, Why dont they just dodge the incoming tank. Or climb up on it. And they Fire the Driver's full of bullets. :)
jacobdouds Posted March 11, 2002 Posted March 11, 2002 To me, in real life, unless you are stupid you probably wouldn't gerun over by a very slow tank.
Aribites Posted March 14, 2002 Posted March 14, 2002 Who's seen Band of Brothers????? Â In dat, a WOUNDED soldier can't get out the way of a tank, and so gets run over. Â All the men who get crushed in YR might be wounded, and so cannot get out of the way!
Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 14, 2002 Posted March 14, 2002 Arbites, That doesnt make any sense. Â ::)Maybe they should run over you with a tank instead! ;DAnyways, The infantry rock is a real savior in the Tank crushing tactic for the infantry. I always camp my Sardauker and Fremen on infantry rock and destroy Harvesters. They can also get a good ground for a Assault on the enemy base.
Acriku Posted March 14, 2002 Posted March 14, 2002 People people people, RA2, which I have, uses the same concept, with different elements. It has it's high points and low points, but IMO if you want some tactical bashing play it. I can guarantee 33% of the people here have only played one side of it, and will probably change their view upon their arguement when they play the other, but other than that just get one and be happy. Or be greedy and get both.
Recommended Posts