Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sad when The U.S. army has the best technology, but can not tell the difference between a camera and a rocket-propelled grenade launcher.

Indeed...I'm not sure how you do mistake a camera for an RPG launcher.

Posted

I can imagine that situation. Tanks besieging a prison full of rebels. Standoff with fingers on firing buttons. Brave cameraman of semitic skin crawls with camera under wall. Then he aims to first tank to take a best shot for us. Red light turns on. Inside the tank reloader yells: "Shit, something radiated us with a laser pointer!" Commander quickly seeks for a source and yells to shooter: "Private, one Ali aiming at us with bazooka on the left, blow his head before he won't do it with us!" Private has no intentions to see the truth: finally some action!

We've learned: don't send cameramen from Palestine to take shots near Middle East battlefields.

Posted

You guys haven't seen the camera. It's a huge camera, with a very long lense. It could easily be mistaken as a grenade launcher, go search for a pic on google. There's a picture of protestors with the camera on a stretcher, and you can see what the camera looks like.

Posted

You guys haven't seen the camera. It's a huge camera, with a very long lense. It could easily be mistaken as a grenade launcher, go search for a pic on google. There's a picture of protestors with the camera on a stretcher, and you can see what the camera looks like.

Well then maybe they should paint the camera to not look like a RPG, like put Americas flag on it.

Posted

I don't really like the whole idea of sending camera-men into the war. Iraq is an unstable country, and they should keep those guys of the field, or have them filming from a tank or in a group of troops.

Posted

Well then maybe they should paint the camera to not look like a RPG, like put Americas flag on it.

ok so a terrorist could paint an american flag on the side of a bomb-filled plane and fly it into the whitehouse?

by your logic that would work

Posted

This guys is the 27th journalist to be killed in this war and he isn't the first to be killed by US troops. I don't see why this is topic-worthy. I feel badly for his family and co-workers of course but I'm surprised this was given it's own topic, especially considering the recent bombing of the UN building...shouldn't it be in the Iraq Issues thread?

Posted

In WW2 there were somekind of war reporters.

They photographed and filmed the horrors of war, but some of them got probably killed too.

What's next? America troops are going to use cars that rides away from them as target practice?

Or children as a m16 practice fire-target.

Posted

Or disguise themselves as a Pikachu, his weapon would be...

No, scrap that, Pikachu doesn't need a weapon if his face is one.

Haha... ;D

Look it's Pikachu....

*Silence.....*

RUNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!

*Arab RPG-armed Camera man and US troops runs away*

Posted

Maybe next time a terrorist will disguise as a journalist? Sure, but here it seems NON-WESTERN journalists are shot, others less... So much that it is dangerous to be a NON-WESTERN journalist in Palestine.

Since they are shot so often, does it mean they are seen as terrorist while it's not the case for western journalists, and that it happens THAT often?

Posted

Egeides, the journalist this thread is referring to was white and western. And did it occur to you that there are probably more Arab journalists in Iraq than western journalists? Iraq is an Arab country after all...

Common sense is a virtue (but not all that common).

Posted

This guys is the 27th journalist to be killed in this war and he isn't the first to be killed by US troops. I don't see why this is topic-worthy. I feel badly for his family and co-workers of course but I'm surprised this was given it's own topic, especially considering the recent bombing of the UN building...shouldn't it be in the Iraq Issues thread?

Probably its because he was a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist.

Posted

I don't feel so. But possibly it does to others, or maybe it was because he was filming at the time, or that he was killed after the end of combat?

Posted

Thanks, by end of combat I was referring to the supposed end of major combat operations. Despite the fact that the casualties are higher now than before for troops.

Posted

Did anyone else think it was a little bit odd about the whole UN-HQ attack news? I mean, it's like 9/11 or something, when around 16 people died. Or am I missing something? (Well, yes I know a high-up guy in the UN died, but more than that?)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.