lowzeewee Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 If saddam didnt disarm for such a long time already.Why didnt USA attack him last time?What's their reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneezer3 Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 They want to go the diplomatic route as far as possable. it will hurt international relations already without UN approval. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 Too late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Egeides Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 Just a question: what exactly does USA call disarm? Beeing in the permitted limits (no nio, no missile more than X range...) should normally be enough. Otherwise, how can Saddam be declard disarmed except by bombing the country, puting depleted uranium everywhere and puting someone favorable to US into power? What other way than that is considered "disarm"??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMA_1 Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 and what the hell does that title name mean? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 and what the hell does that title name mean? lol It does attract attention... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 You obviously haven't checked the new CIA-approved dictionary yet... ;)"to disarm" = to fully surrender to the United StatesAnd other highlights:"terrorist" = a person that the US government doesn't like (see also "communist")"democratic leader" = US puppet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sneezer3 Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 To Disarm = To account for all 100 Canisters of Anthrax along with the other weapons and prove it.If he wanted to disarm he would have disarmed by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken124578 Posted March 17, 2003 Share Posted March 17, 2003 and what the hell does that title name mean? lolISDDFSALTAWDUSAAHLTWTR?I = IfS = SaddamD = Didn'tD = Disarmetc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted March 18, 2003 Share Posted March 18, 2003 If saddam didnt disarm for such a long time already.Why didnt USA attack him last time?What's their reason?because the UN ordered a cease-fire in March of 1991 and the US (regrettably) obeyed the UN orders.hopefully we learned our lesson about obeying the UN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeLeto Posted March 18, 2003 Share Posted March 18, 2003 The UN said not to oust Saddam. In retrospect, probably not their brightest move. But you know what they say, hindsight is always 20/20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowzeewee Posted March 18, 2003 Author Share Posted March 18, 2003 You obviously haven't checked the new CIA-approved dictionary yet... ;)"to disarm" = to fully surrender to the United StatesAnd other highlights:"terrorist" = a person that the US government doesn't like (see also "communist")"democratic leader" = US puppetyes,you are right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lowzeewee Posted March 18, 2003 Author Share Posted March 18, 2003 oh ok i get it now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts