Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just a question: what exactly does USA call disarm? Beeing in the permitted limits (no nio, no missile more than X range...) should normally be enough. Otherwise, how can Saddam be declard disarmed except by bombing the country, puting depleted uranium everywhere and puting someone favorable to US into power? What other way than that is considered "disarm"???

Posted

You obviously haven't checked the new CIA-approved dictionary yet... ;)

"to disarm" = to fully surrender to the United States

And other highlights:

"terrorist" = a person that the US government doesn't like (see also "communist")

"democratic leader" = US puppet

Posted

To Disarm = To account for all 100 Canisters of Anthrax along with the other weapons and prove it.

If he wanted to disarm he would have disarmed by now.

Posted

If saddam didnt disarm for such a long time already.Why didnt USA attack him last time?What's their reason?

because the UN ordered a cease-fire in March of 1991 and the US (regrettably) obeyed the UN orders.

hopefully we learned our lesson about obeying the UN.

Posted

The UN said not to oust Saddam. In retrospect, probably not their brightest move. But you know what they say, hindsight is always 20/20.

Posted

You obviously haven't checked the new CIA-approved dictionary yet... ;)

"to disarm" = to fully surrender to the United States

And other highlights:

"terrorist" = a person that the US government doesn't like (see also "communist")

"democratic leader" = US puppet

yes,you are right
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.