Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What do you make of this:

"The Gulf War was actually rehearsed every year for many years in "Operation Bright Star" which actually named Kuwait as the "small nation" which would be attacked by a "larger neighbor nation". Operation Bright Star was outlined thoroughly in a book published by Arco Press entitled "U. S. Rapid Deployment Forces" several years before the Gulf War took place. In the book Kuwait was named as the small nation that would be attacked by it's larger neighbor nation. Saddam Hussein played his part well... and you wondered why we never killed him. Ask the Illuminati's George Bush.

The terrorists attacks which will be launched in the United States will be blamed upon middle eastern religious fanatics, Christian fundamentalists, white supremacists, Patriots, or Militias. A more immediate result of these operations will be the increased use of military forces, weaponry, and equipment such as tanks and armored personnel carriers in civilian law enforcement, the suspension or elimination of Habeas Corpus, the elimination of jury trials, the attempted disarming of the American People, and the institution of martial law with show-trials conducted by a tribunal of judges.

When you continue to hear this Constitutional Republic referred to as a "democracy" you must remember that V.I. Lenin said, "Democracy is indispensable to socialism." When you hear our military referred to as "UN Peace Keepers" remember that both Marx and Lenin defined "peace" as, "the elimination of all opposition to socialism." If you really want to discover exactly what type of government we are supposed to have read Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States of America."

Sounds strange, doesn't it?

Posted

Isn't China becoming socialistic? I think socialistic governments allows companies/corporations, but does still "take care" of the underclass...

Posted

Isn't China becoming socialistic? I think socialistic governments allows companies/corporations, but does still "take care" of the underclass...

becoming??? its communist! LOL =).

Posted

Yes, I do know it is communistic, but they do allow corporations and etc, AND privat companies too, so they are not "real" communists...

Posted

Here's more:

"Socialists who make movies have desensitized the nation (particularly impressionable youth) to violence and bloodshed. They have fostered the notion that anything goes as long as you don't get caught... that morals are bad. Motion pictures, television, and extremely sophisticated mind control operations are destroying our society.

Who among you really believes that all of a sudden and for no reason whatsoever young children all over the nation pick up firearms and decide to murder their parents, classmates, and teachers? How many of you realize that the majority of these children were receiving treatment (hypnosis and drugs) from mental health professionals? How many of you realize that it is these same mental health professionals who have created the "alien abduction" and "abused children" phenomenon which has surged across the nation? How many of you have ever realized that most so-called mental health professionals are self confessed Marxists. When are you going to stop being ignorant sheople? Have you ever asked yourself why these incidents always happen just before legislators must vote on important gun legislation?"

(Note: These are not my words.)

Posted

Yeah, it's an evil communist conspiracy! They're plotting to take over the world! ::)

Next, we will show you how the Sept. 11 attacks were carried out by aliens from the planet Zorg in retaliation to the experiments performed by shadowy government agencies on their ambassadors.

Posted

There will never be a communist state that was idealized on paper, but there will be variants, perhaps in the future as well.

Towards the first post, when was this posted? Is it some sort of a prediction? Anyways, America is getting rid of all that oppress, not oppose.

Posted

Well, then counter-proove it! :P

Oh, and here is some "proof" of that man has never been in space:

"To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon.

All names, missions, landing sites, and events in the Apollo Space Program echo the occult metaphors, rituals, and symbology of the Illuminati's secret religion. The most transparent was the faked explosion on the spacecraft Apollo 13, named "Aquarius" (new age) at 1:13 (1313 military time) on April 13, 1970 which was the metaphor for the initiation ceremony involving the death (explosion), placement in the coffin (period of uncertainty of their survival), communion with the spiritual world and the imparting of esoteric knowledge to the candidate (orbit and observation of the moon without physical contact), rebirth of the initiate (solution of problem and repairs), and the raising up (of the Phoenix, the new age of Aquarius) by the grip of the lions paw (reentry and recovery of Apollo 13). 13 is the number of death and rebirth, death and reincarnation, sacrifice, the Phoenix, the Christ (perfected soul imprisoned in matter), and the transition from the old to the new. Another revelation to those who understand the symbolic language of the Illuminati is the hidden meaning of the names of the Space Shuttles, "A Colombian Enterprise to Endeavor for the Discovery of Atlantis... and all Challengers shall be destroyed."

Exploration of the moon stopped because it was impossible to continue the hoax without being discovered. And of course they ran out of pre-filmed episodes.

No man has ever ascended much higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth's surface. At or under that altitude the astronauts are beneath the radiation of the Van Allen Belt and the Van Allen Belt shields them from the extreme radiation which permeates space. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and with a far different technology.

The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar radiation, cosmic radiation, Solar flares, temperature control, and many other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technology. Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings.

If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moons surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum... and that is not even taking into consideration any effects of cosmic radiation, Solar flares, micrometeorites, etc. NASA tells us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space.

Heat is defined as the vibration or movement of molecules within matter. The faster the molecular motion the higher the temperature. The slower the molecular motion the colder the temperature. Absolute zero is that point where all molecular motion ceases. In order to have hot or cold, molecules must be present.

A vacuum is a condition of nothingness where there are no molecules. Vacuums exist in degrees. Some scientists tell us that there is no such thing as an absolute vacuum. Space is the closest thing to an absolute vacuum that is known to us. There are so few molecules present in most areas of what we know as "space" that any concept of "hot" or "cold" is impossible to measure. A vacuum is a perfect insulator. That is why a "Thermos" or vacuum bottle is used to store hot or cold liquids in order to maintain the temperature for the longest time possible without re-heating or re-cooling.

Radiation of all types will travel through a vacuum but will not affect the vacuum. Radiant heat from the sun travels through the vacuum of space but does not "warm" space. In fact the radiant heat of the sun has no affect whatsoever until it strikes matter. Molecular movement will increase in direct proportion to the radiant energy which is absorbed by matter. The time it takes to heat matter exposed to direct sunlight in space is determined by its color, its elemental properties, its distance from the sun, and its rate of absorption of radiant heat energy. Space is NOT hot. Space is NOT cold.

Objects which are heated cannot be cooled by space. In order for an object to cool it must first be removed from direct sunlight. Objects which are in the shadow of another object will eventually cool but not because space is "cold". Space is not cold. Hot and cold do not exist in the vacuum of space. Objects cool because the laws of motion dictate that the molecules of the object will slow down due to the resistance resulting from striking other molecules until eventually all motion will stop provided the object is sheltered from the direct and/or indirect radiation of the sun and that there is no other source of heat. Since the vacuum of space is the perfect insulator objects take a very long time to cool even when removed from all sources of heat, radiated or otherwise.

NASA insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast in his suit in such a circumstance."

Much to read, much to be taken lightly. But, who knows?

Posted

Exactly Acriku. Humans are human, so the equality presented by Communism would be nearly impossible for most humans to live with for more then a day, people just couldn't possibly mantain that level.

Posted

Dudedoc, don't forget that about twenty US presidents (including Grand Master Washington) were freemasons, which are on opposite side than Illuminati ;)

But about your sooo-loved left wing. Communism has to oppress citizens, especially intelligence, which is usually against concentration of power in government's hands. Everyone must have same opinion as government, or at least no possibility to say it. Other possible way to create leftist utopia is anarchy - but I wouldn't risk that.

Posted

Dudedoc, don't forget that about twenty US presidents (including Grand Master Washington) were freemasons, which are on opposite side than Illuminati ;)

Are you sure?

"You cannot hope to understand the philosophy (Illuminism) of any branch of the "Mystery School" (Illuminati) without many years of study and a complete knowledge of their "symbolic" language. You must understand that like many other organizations they attract those who completely miss the boat... or are just too stupid to "get it". When an individual joins a branch of the "Brotherhood," by any name, Freemasonry, Theosophical Society, Anthroposophic Society, Fraternitis Rosae Crucae, Knights Templar, Sovereign and Military Order of the Knights of Malta, or any other fraternal order or secret society, no one ever sits down with them and explains the meaning of anything. An actual literal esoteric education would be too dangerous. It could result in a public expose'... something which the Illuminati must avoid at all cost. But to give those who might understand a shortcut... Illuminism is COMMUNISM."

Posted

There is an anarchist group in my hometown, but they have no idea what anarchy is. They continue to suggest that anarchy is system of committees that governs each aspect of life, with representatives of each committee ruling over all the rest.

Posted

Yes. The thing is that if the Illuminati exists, then they must have a very good plan of conquering the world. Of course they create false societies! Does anybody really know, I mean KNOW like you'd been with them, what Freemasonry for example is? I do know that it is a large global group, who believes in "something greater". But what are they doing and why? Isn't it foolish to just "believe in something greater" without any explanation of why you should believe, what the morals is (don't eat pig-meat for example etc) and so on? I think Freemasonry is a master-slave kind of "school", where they teach you to live together and be ordered by one "greater force". Anyways, like I said, if they exist they do so in great secret, so big that even those who think they know about it does not...

Posted

But about your sooo-loved left wing. Communism has to oppress citizens, especially intelligence, which is usually against concentration of power in government's hands. Everyone must have same opinion as government, or at least no possibility to say it. Other possible way to create leftist utopia is anarchy - but I wouldn't risk that.

With all due respect, you have NO idea what true communism is about. Go to this site to see for yourself:

www.marxists.org

Posted

Hmm, just when I thought it was all getting silly. I actually had a conversation with someone last night aboutt he Illuminati and Bush, it was quite entertaining. *whispers conspiratolly* There is no Illuminati...really...there isn't...would I ever attempt to mislead you for my personal gain in their eyes? Of course you haven't gone as far as the girl last night did, sure Bush was in the league with bin Laden.

Posted

Illuminates could be behind republicans, but most democrats were freemasons. Last was Ford, but maybe that all is just a nonsense. Maybe ::)

But about your sooo-loved left wing. Communism has to oppress citizens, especially intelligence, which is usually against concentration of power in government's hands. Everyone must have same opinion as government, or at least no possibility to say it. Other possible way to create leftist utopia is anarchy - but I wouldn't risk that.

With all due respect, you have NO idea what true communism is about. Go to this site to see for yourself:

www.marxists.org

True communism is an utopia.

Posted

Indeed.

And while striving to achieve an utopia, although we will never actually get there, we will be constantly improving the lives of the people.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.