Jump to content

Hussein Speaks


 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes he does. So, what does everyone here think will happen next? Is Saddam telling the truth from the heart, that he is really sad about the invasion of Kuwait, or does he just "picture it out" in the media for folks to believe? Will there be more terrorist actions after this? I'd say Saddam has shipped out all his deadly weapons and weapons of MD a long time ago. I think the UN is just playing around. It's like telling your parents to search your room for drugs when you already have hidden them in another place (ie not in your room :P). And what will they do when they finnish the search? Will they still be monitoring Iraq, or is that against UN rules, if there are such? Your opinion. Stay on topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hussein is a wonderful man.lol cant wait to see your guys' reactions. anyways enough of the immaturity. The problem is, saddam has done many dealings that deserve his destruction. Iraq should be taken for its own people's use and how they see fit, since they live there and all and "we are not a tyrannic government that controls what other nations do.) ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But how can they do that when their government is ruled by one man? Their government decides what the people can say and can not. Besides, the people can't excape the country. They don't have any money, or most of those who want's to leave don't. And where should they go? They are an oppressed population, that's why the U.S. cares what becomes of them. Why the U.S. don't go after North Korea, is because North Korea do not have a dictator that executes thousands of his own people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well you know the problem is... they could've done it long before.. in the gulf war the were almost there and could've kicked saddam from the throne.. but because the US didn't know a good candidate to rule Irak they stopped the invasion and pulled back.. that is the only reason why saddam is still there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well you know the problem is... they could've done it long before.. in the gulf war the were almost there and could've kicked saddam from the throne..

The allies had several opportunities to stop Hitler early too, but they waited until it was almost too late. He had already taken Austria, Chechoslavakia, and flat out told everyone he was going to conquer the world in Mein Kampf. Britain and France waited until he took Poland to do anything. The US waited until Japan had attacked them.

If Saddam Hussein isn't stopped now, the UN will have proved to be just as ineffective now as the league of nations was then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Leauge of Nations was just another bullshit thing, very much like the UN are today. At that time, countries didn't think of other countries as much. No one cared for Poland or Norway or something. They just did not want another war, so they gave Hitler and the Reich the grantenance. But after Hitler went mad and tried to conquer the world, then the Allies had do cowork to do anything. Or maybe there is something much bigger behind both the LN and UN? Nobody knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...