devastator vs minotaurus

[Terror]

that is true yes... but i also agree with bazza... normally the deva would easily win... the strategie that you are talking about takes a lot of micromanagement and in big scale battles is impossible to do

[Devastator_Mech]

In that scenario, Devastators would win, regardless of range. The mino salvos could only take out a few (like 3) devastaors head on, and by the time they (the minos reloaded) their guns, the devastaors would have already knocked out at least half the minos. And if all else fails, the devs could self-destruct.

your right mate

the mighty devastator could win the minotaurus in anyday, unless the devo ar in bad condition, it absolutely has the ability to destroy any unit in a head-on combat, because at full power a devo could easily destroy any unit within 2 burst, this is a fact and also a guaranteed point, there should be no doubt about it. ;D

I could guarantee absolutely no stratergy could defeat a devastator thats in full health with only any one unit

[Black_Emperor]

4 atredies, 3 Minotaurus,

                 10 mongeese,

                  5 ornitophers,

                  OR 19 kunjas

can take out a dev

[Terror]

yes.... but not 1 on 1.... and what do you mean with 4 atreides?

[Black_Emperor]

i was lazy, i ment FOR atredies, you know, when using them.

[Devastator_Mech]

Terror is absolutely right :) :), what you have told us is not 1 on 1, but overnumbering!!! :P

And won't a devastator be cheaper than 3 minotauruses, or 10 mongooses, or 5 ornithophers, or 19 kinjals !! Dumbass!!! :P

I'll rather build a couple of devastators myself than build a multiple amount of other crappy weaklings!! 8) :P

[Terror]

Well thank you Bazza  :-*

[Black_Emperor]

its spelled vindicator terror

[Caid Ivik]

Devastator is one big, inaccurate, slow and unusable nuclear saboteur.

[Devastator_Mech]

Devastator is one big, inaccurate, slow and unusable nuclear saboteur.

A devastator is a mighty multi-purpose mech, its far from inaccurate, ok, compared to a minotaurus. Yes, its slow, but the armor will compensate for that and a slow version of a super atomic saboteur. ;D

[Black_Emperor]

4 of the 6 things you said is correct Caid

[Caid Ivik]

4 of the 6 things you said is correct Caid

Yes: slow, big, inaccurate and unusable  ;D

[Gunseng_Harkonnen]

Devas are very good. Try attack base where are devas. They are great defence. They maybe slow but very powerful.

[Black_Emperor]

Yes: slow, big, inaccurate and unusable  

uh...actually, i was kinda meaning the parts about big, slow, nuclear, and sabataur... but i guess thats fine 2

[Sardauker-Kirov]

I think they need to add Regeneration to the Devastator. It would be cool if they did that

[Black_Emperor]

it can regenerate at lv2

ohh, and its

VERRRY slow, VERRY powerful, VERRY...worm attracting

[Sardauker-Kirov]

One flame tank takes care of that problem.  ;)

[Gunseng_Harkonnen]

Worm? Its very possible that will be eaten too.

But usualy devastator doesn`t visit spice field and other worm-can-surf places often.

[Terror]

if i can't stop the worm i usually sacrifice a cheap vehicle.. (usually the buzzsaw, dust scout or sandbike)

[Black_Emperor]

just shoot em, worth a lot of experience

[Devastator_Mech]

Sometimes the worm locks-on a particular unit and moves straight up, instead of surf towards on the surface, so you can't always stop the worm.

[Gunseng_Harkonnen]

Sometimes worm go near units without eating them. This must be not hungry worm. Another time worm running after unit around map like crazy.

[Caid Ivik]

One flame tank takes care of that problem.

[Gunseng_Harkonnen]

Vertical worm will eat flame aftr it see what happened. But maybe Kirov thought about surface one.

[Caid Ivik]

Because he didn't wrote it  ;D

But also is Devastator unusable.