Jump to content

The use of gender-neutral pronouns in English


MrFlibble

Recommended Posts

Would you <b>ever</b> refer to a <i>sudno</i> or <i>lodka</i> using <i>on</i>?

Absolutely not. It is worth mentioning, though, that if the name of a vessel has a different gender than the word for its generic term, the gender forms corresponding to the name may be used. But technically that's not the use of one gender to refer to antecedents of another gender, which would be a violation of grammaticity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gender issue is so annoying. I often see contracts with a side note that the whole text will be speaking of the male gender but refers to both. This "political correctness" annoys me me. If anybody really has a problem, then why don't we just invent a neutral form instead of starting to use both forms for both genders and make things even more complicated? Then funny thing is: we already have a neutral article in the german language (der, die, das - first one is male, second female, third is neutral). So "the sun" is female (die Sonne), "the moon" is male (der mond), and "the universe" is neutral (das universum).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I heard the rule before that, in Russian, the gender of a vessel's name may supersede the gender of whatever word is normally used to describe the vessel. Though I'm loathe to admit it, I'm fairly certain I read it in "The Hunt for Red October" (Красный Октябрь or Krasniy Oktyabr having a different gender, I suspect male, from whatever gender is typically assigned to a ballistic missile submarine) though I cannot recall if there was mention of any other Russian grammatical rules on this subject.

Oh, and no offense to you, veK, but I stopped taking German classes for largely that reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So "the sun" is female (die Sonne), "the moon" is male (der mond), and "the universe" is neutral (das universum).

Now that is interesting, because it may give us some insight into the mythology of the early Germans. I suppose there must have been a Sun goddess and a Moon god. That's a bit unusual, isn't it? In Egyptian, Greek, Latin and even Mayan, Aztec and Inca mythology, the Sun was male. I'm fairly certain the Sun was also male in Mesopotamian mythology.

It is logical that patriarchal societies with a male priesthood would assign a male gender to the most impressive object in the sky. Now I'm really curious to know why the early Germans thought the Sun was female. Maybe they were not a male-dominated society? That seems unlikely for an Indo-European tribe...

I wouldn't want to learn the language either if it wasn't my native language  ;)

There are far easier, more important and/or better sounding languages one can learn.

Well, I'm sure there are many important historical documents written in German that haven't been translated into other languages. And German is the most widely spoken native language in the European Union.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I heard the rule before that, in Russian, the gender of a vessel's name may supersede the gender of whatever word is normally used to describe the vessel. Though I'm loathe to admit it, I'm fairly certain I read it in "The Hunt for Red October" (Красный Октябрь or Krasniy Oktyabr having a different gender, I suspect male, from whatever gender is typically assigned to a ballistic missile submarine) though I cannot recall if there was mention of any other Russian grammatical rules on this subject.

That is correct. Подводная лодка 'submarine' is feminine, while октябрь is masculine.

Now that is interesting, because it may give us some insight into the mythology of the early Germans. I suppose there must have been a Sun goddess and a Moon god. That's a bit unusual, isn't it? In Egyptian, Greek, Latin and even Mayan, Aztec and Inca mythology, the Sun was male. I'm fairly certain the Sun was also male in Mesopotamian mythology.

I'm afraid this is a lot more complicated than that. There is no telling whether personification affected the choice of grammatical gender. As stated above, "M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely not. It is worth mentioning, though, that if the name of a vessel has a different gender than the word for its generic term, the gender forms corresponding to the name may be used. But technically that's not the use of one gender to refer to antecedents of another gender, which would be a violation of grammaticity.

Спасибо. :)

Interesting point about the influence of the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...