MrFlibble Posted March 12, 2008 Share Posted March 12, 2008 Yes, in C&C: TD the sides are called "houses" in the internal language ;) Just open any mission INI file and see for yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted March 13, 2008 Author Share Posted March 13, 2008 Just saw some screenshots of the Titan and Wolverine, and they look really good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted April 11, 2008 Author Share Posted April 11, 2008 I have the game now, just about to install it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunner154 Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Did you take the set that came with the mouse? ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 I would say that the original C&C was definitely more ambiguous in terms of "good guys" and "bad guys" - the Brotherhood of Nod certainly seemed justified, if somewhat ruthless. And GDI seemed rather militaristic and oppressive.Nod's tiberium experiments in Tiberian Sun made them seem a lot less justified. I really think that was Kane's fault, though. He is the one always pushing Nod to embrace tiberium, and overseeing all the experiments. I liked Nod a lot more after Kane died (again) and Slavik took over in Firestorm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunner154 Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 I'd say a lot of it has to do with artistic portrayal as well. Nod seemed like just another organisation that had a military. Plus all the speeches and the like. They seemed... ordinary, just like any other non-profit organisation out there (how warped my impressions are).But in Tiberian Sun, everything turned really red, with infantry donning black outfits with helmets and all. They were seemingly dressed to look like the bad guys. Think Stormtroopers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted April 17, 2008 Author Share Posted April 17, 2008 Did you take the set that came with the mouse? ;)The what?Anyway, I'm actually really enjoying playing this game in comparison to normal Tiberium Wars, because it does add a lot of new elements to the game, although I have not really tried the Global Conquest mode yet. The Marked of Kane are definitely fun to play as, and some of the new units are truly huge, such as GDI's MARV, which is the size of 4 Mammoth Tanks, and harvests Tiberium when it goes over Tiberium fields. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunner154 Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 There's a special release in Singapore which includes a mouse. It costs significant more as well. Almost double the price. There's even a message on the mouse box talking about the importance of a good mouse in gaming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFlibble Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 Does it at least look like a miniature Mammoth Tank? ;) (would probably be a real pain using it, though :P) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunner154 Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 Far from it. It just looks like one of those ordinary gaming mice with many buttons.You know... Razor. Along those lines. And probably one claimed to be ideal for the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted April 18, 2008 Author Share Posted April 18, 2008 So has anyone else got the game? Just had a 1v1v1 match, playing as GDI against Nod and Scrin, and I won against the two medium enemies, so I'm improving quite a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edric O Posted April 19, 2008 Share Posted April 19, 2008 I don't even have Tiberium Wars (yet), because I didn't expect my computer to meet the system requirements. Speaking of which, what are the requirements? Maybe I was wrong... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFlibble Posted April 20, 2008 Share Posted April 20, 2008 Wikipedia knows all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_&_Conquer_3.At least, I hope so :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted April 20, 2008 Author Share Posted April 20, 2008 System requirements:  * Windows XP, Windows Vista (32-bit)  * 2.0 GHz or AMD equivalent / Windows Vista 2.2 GHz  * 512 MB RAM / Windows Vista 1 GB RAM  * 8x DVD drive  * 6.0 GB free space  * GeForce 4 Ti, ATI Radeon 8500 video card, Intel GMA 900  * DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card  * 56 Kbp/s Internet connection for online play  * Macintosh:  * Mac OS X v10.4.9 or later  * 1.83 GHz or faster Intel Core Duo processor  * 1GB RAM  * 6GB free hard-disk space  * Video card: ATI X1600 series or later; NVIDIA GeForce 7300 or later  * DVD-ROM drive  * Also works on PowerPC  * Note: This game does not support the GMA950 integrated graphics card Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunner154 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 You could always try the demo. It's a good indicator of how well your computer would be able to run it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 My laptop runs it quite well, although I haven't checked the settings on it. However a Nod Turtle enemy slows the game down a bit, due to the sheer mass of turrets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulesG Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 :OWatch out - according to all the C&C forums Kanes Wrath uses more memory in-game than the C&C3 specs of 512K, more like 640k.I have found the game to load slower (I have 2Gb RAM) and I had to drop the GFX to medium/high rather than high using my GeForce 7900GS.Dont play online just repeating campaign on HARD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khan Posted May 2, 2008 Share Posted May 2, 2008 I assume you mean MB although 640 MB seems quite low, I'd have thought most games would be requiring at least a gig (2 or 3 on vista) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted May 6, 2008 Author Share Posted May 6, 2008 From what I remember it needs at least 1GB of RAM, and 2GB on Vista. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted May 8, 2008 Author Share Posted May 8, 2008 Nah, just kidding, it has been confirmed that there will not be a second expansion pack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunner154 Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 Why wouldn't they want to continue to ride on the wave of success? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunenewt Posted May 10, 2008 Author Share Posted May 10, 2008 Because Red Alert 3 is coming out at the end of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnc95fan Posted June 19, 2008 Share Posted June 19, 2008 C&C3 and KW fail. So RA3 automatically fails. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.