Emperor:how to improve it!

[stefcam007]

Emperor battle for dune

This is a good game!

But when i heard about this i expected something great and it really failed to deliver based on Red Alert 2's sucess(RA2 was the best RTS of that year).

after reading some of the problems with emperor from the forum it seems people are unhappy about the game as a whole.

I personally think the biggest problems are

1.the way tanks get destroyed is pathetic they just fall into pieces

2.Units get destroyed too fast(in a matter of seconds)

3.Movement of the unit looks like your playing with building blocks

4.the soldiers are just helpless when facing a real baddie like a devastator even a group of about 10 aa troops can barely give a fight.

5.Like one problem i read about (by Borderguard) should be addressedsuch as the dependency on soldiers theres no strategy if you can mass produce tanks and make your opponent tremble at the sight of 30 devastators

these are a few problems and someone at westwood studios should realise these and do something about it.

[erjin999]

Where do these people pop up from ?

Experts, on the fringes of the internet, occasionally make close passes to Fed2k, where we see their trails (the posts they make).

Seriously, when did you last play this game ? Most of your gripes are about the graphics. People still play dune2000, they care more about gameplay then graphics, which is something I agree about.

If you want tanks that blow up better, go play Genereals, I think thats better at that.  ::)

You would never be allowed to mass 30 Devos.

[Schorpie]

how good a game is is your own opinion, for me this is (was) the best RTS ever.

Believe me, i've played many RTS games (including RA2, starcraft, warcraft3, cnc generals,...)

[Megashrap]

Emperor battle for dune

I personally think the biggest problems are

1.the way tanks get destroyed is pathetic they just fall into pieces

2.Units get destroyed too fast(in a matter of seconds)

3.Movement of the unit looks like your playing with building blocks

4.the soldiers are just helpless when facing a real baddie like a devastator even a group of about 10 aa troops can barely give a fight.

5.Like one problem i read about (by Borderguard) should be addressedsuch as the dependency on soldiers theres no strategy if you can mass produce tanks and make your opponent tremble at the sight of 30 devastators

these are a few problems and someone at westwood studios should realise these and do something about it.

Man that's not even a legit complaint. Everything you mentioned is false, and silly as hell. Usually, the only people now that post such things about Emp. are most likely playing a ripped version, and have never played an online game (even though EBFD can be bought now for a buck .05). But, I do love a good laugh anytime.

[jeff2429]

I personally think the biggest problems are

1.the way tanks get destroyed is pathetic they just fall into pieces

2.Units get destroyed too fast(in a matter of seconds)

3.Movement of the unit looks like your playing with building blocks

4.the soldiers are just helpless when facing a real baddie like a devastator even a group of about 10 aa troops can barely give a fight.

5.Like one problem i read about (by Borderguard) should be addressedsuch as the dependency on soldiers theres no strategy if you can mass produce tanks and make your opponent tremble at the sight of 30 devastators

#1 - Is your opinion.

#2 - They only are killed fast when multiple enemies are attacking it at once, and it's usually light armored units.

#3 - Is your opinion again which IMO is stupid.

#4 - Play the game first.

#5 - Infaltry play a major role in the game.  I could easy make 30 devs against you and win easily  but not against anyone else.  I could let you make 30 devs and then kill them all with 15 sard elites or a few worms. 

Rostok is the GAYEST.

[Rostok]

Emperor battle for dune

This is a good game!

But when i heard about this i expected something great and it really failed to deliver based on Red Alert 2's sucess(RA2 was the best RTS of that year).

after reading some of the problems with emperor from the forum it seems people are unhappy about the game as a whole.

I personally think the biggest problems are

1.the way tanks get destroyed is pathetic they just fall into pieces

2.Units get destroyed too fast(in a matter of seconds)

3.Movement of the unit looks like your playing with building blocks

4.the soldiers are just helpless when facing a real baddie like a devastator even a group of about 10 aa troops can barely give a fight.

5.Like one problem i read about (by Borderguard) should be addressedsuch as the dependency on soldiers theres no strategy if you can mass produce tanks and make your opponent tremble at the sight of 30 devastators

these are a few problems and someone at westwood studios should realise these and do something about it.

hi

1. what would u like them to do? suggest a solution.

2. that depends on alot of factors.... i suppose u could turn the game speed down if u really want to? dont expect to play online tho

3. see 1.

4. this isn't worthy of a response. ok, maybe a little one. Would you like a chem trooper to be able to take out a devestator? again, refer to #1

5. Your opponent deserves to die if he/she/it lets u mass, and does nothing to defend him/her/itself.

last but not least, westwood ditched this game 2 yrs ago, good luck getting them to give a funk

ps: RA2 was way unbalanced.

pss: why are all the new threads EXACTLY the same as old ones?

psss: jeff2429 is gay

[GUNWOUNDS]

Emperor battle for dune

This is a good game!

But when i heard about this i expected something great and it really failed to deliver based on Red Alert 2's sucess(RA2 was the best RTS of that year).

after reading some of the problems with emperor from the forum it seems people are unhappy about the game as a whole.

I personally think the biggest problems are

1.the way tanks get destroyed is pathetic they just fall into pieces

2.Units get destroyed too fast(in a matter of seconds)

3.Movement of the unit looks like your playing with building blocks

4.the soldiers are just helpless when facing a real baddie like a devastator even a group of about 10 aa troops can barely give a fight.

5.Like one problem i read about (by Borderguard) should be addressedsuch as the dependency on soldiers theres no strategy if you can mass produce tanks and make your opponent tremble at the sight of 30 devastators

these are a few problems and someone at westwood studios should realise these and do something about it.

I think you are upset about the fact that a tank has a hard time killing infantry.. and that AA men cannot kill snipers.

NEWSFLASH... Emperor has a special way of balancing units.... its callled rock, paper, scissors, ... basically each unit has a damage type that it is immune to.. and a damage type that it is extremely weak too.

[KALONY]

dont forget the gamespeed....i tried generals 1 time, but was bored after 30 minuits, coz it was so dam slow. emp means action in a rts game, emp means R O C K ! ! !

kalony

ps.:

[ken124578]

No need to be rude, guys.

[desertway]

Have you even played this game online?

You posted...but I haven't seen you respond to anyones reply. Personally I think you have no idea what you're talking about. Try playing the game before comenting on it's play and graphics. Better yet just go away!!!

[atrd3m0n]

OMFG under what rock have you been sitting, first of all i cant recall a single time you have been online, and just because RA2 was elected as the best RTS back then, doesnt mean Emp is so much worse, u might try to actually play this game instead of copying reviews. Emperor has just never received the commercial campaign RA2 has, and just because of this doesnt mean emperor is so much worse, IMO RA2 is a joke compared to the sheer brutal hard paced action of emperor, but i guess its all just too fast for you. So please dont post anymore of your totally unbased bs criticism, because you havent been around enough to give a good opinion about this game, let alone you would be able to state such remarks with any decent grounds to base it on. So please crawl back under your rock again and stuff your criticism for things you actually know something about. noob. :-X

[erjin999]

NOw who went and deleted my wonderful and insightful post ?

It was only in the same vein as these ones above...

[ken124578]

Enough is enough!