GUNWOUNDS Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 I just happened to look at the back of my Box and read the requirements...-Intel Pentium II 400 MHz- 64 MB RAM- 600 MB Hard Drive- 16 MB Graphics Card-Direct3D 3D Accelerator-DirectX 7.0a sound card. Is this a friggin joke? .... no wonder some people lagg so bad... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyberotter Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 well its required to play, and its not like lagging and playing isnt playing :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quoudam72 Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 Yes that is the mimium requirements only if people knew or should I say understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted September 17, 2004 Author Share Posted September 17, 2004 Yes that is the mimium requirements only if people knew or should I say understand. yea IMO they should not post "minimum" requirements as that gives a poor gaming experience. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quoudam72 Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 Agreed, but may it is not the developer but the publisher that makes such misleading statements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchemi2 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 What are the recommended requirements Guns IYO for a none laggy/freeze up game?That would be helpful info for anyone new. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted September 18, 2004 Author Share Posted September 18, 2004 What are the recommended requirements Guns IYO for a none laggy/freeze up game?That would be helpful info for anyone new. ;)Gunwound's Official Opinion is that you should have OS - Either Windows XP Home/ProProcessor - no less than a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KALONY Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 and dont forget the best mouse for working and playing :the logitech optical wheel mouseok, the game wont lag, but maybe ur skills...lolKALONY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchemi2 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 erm i only have a Geforce4 mx440 agp8x 64 mb DDr graphic card and i didn' think i lagged!!!all other specs are above those posted though ;)And that was the graphic card recommended by shop for my new motherboard was i duped ::) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted September 18, 2004 Author Share Posted September 18, 2004 64 is ok.. but in big games it can crunch on you and you will end up getting laggy 3/4's into the game .... the reason i said 128 is because the 128 version is only 5-10 dollars more....So yea... you did get kinda jipped cause for 5-10 bucks more you coulda had double the memory and peformance... which is nice because most graphics cards jump in prices from level to level by about 50-100 dollars or more.So a 5-10 dollar increment between the 64 MB mxx card and the 128MB mmx card is irrelevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megashrap Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Yea those sys req. are wacky for sure for emp but when I first started playing I used a Duron-700,128 ram, an old 32 meg monster card and I hardly ever lagged unless I was playin someone with a dial-up. But for 40-80 bucks you can get a nice AMD cpu from a duron up to 2500+ the prices for those are unreal now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erjin999 Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Considering prices today, there shouldn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted September 19, 2004 Author Share Posted September 19, 2004 Yea those sys req. are wacky for sure for emp but when I first started playing I used a Duron-700,128 ram, an old 32 meg monster card and I hardly ever lagged unless I was playin someone with a dial-up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rostok Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 imo 1ghz cpu, 256 ram, 64 meg graphics card is all you need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted September 19, 2004 Author Share Posted September 19, 2004 imo 1ghz cpu, 256 ram, 64 meg graphics card is all you need.yes if you plan on only playing 1 vs 1 on Sandy pass.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XTF Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 64 is ok.. but in big games it can crunch on you and you will end up getting laggy 3/4's into the game .... the reason i said 128 is because the 128 version is only 5-10 dollars more....So yea... you did get kinda jipped cause for 5-10 bucks more you coulda had double the memory and peformance... which is nice because most graphics cards jump in prices from level to level by about 50-100 dollars or more.So a 5-10 dollar increment between the 64 MB mxx card and the 128MB mmx card is irrelevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Daddy Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 Here's a few aditional thoughts on system performance.First go here- http://www.majorgeeks.com/download1712.html -download this test, make sure you meet the system requirements. If not follow the link to the 2001 free test. The website for an outline of the product, is here- http://www.futuremark.com/products/3dmark03/Best of all its FREE, and the test is cool to watch. And there is an online results browser so you can compare your results with other systems similarly configured. All you have to do is create a profile like you do here. And you can also save the results in a file for comparison, this way if you change something, like a video card or drivers, you can see if the results are a benifit or not. One word of caution, it is a large download. Then go here -http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/xpprofiles.htm -READ THIS THOROUGHLY, and set up a game configuration. If you follow the steps EXACTLY as outlined it's not hard at all, just takes a little time. You would be amazed at how much crap is running in the background sucking up your resources. WAY more than you will see if you just hit ctrl- alt- del. and randomly end processes.Some of you might find this to be a low budget way to boost the performance marginal systems, because I know a lot of the community is younger and might not have the financial resources to just go out and buy new equipment.And one thought on Gunwounds recommendations, yes the GeForce 4 would be a cheap step up from onboard graphics, they really don't benchmark all that well, my nephew has one in a P4 1.5 ghz machine and my GeForce fx series in my althon system ate its lunch BIG TIME in the benchmarks. My point is with the new PCI express cards coming out, the price on the fx series should drop even more, and they are not too expensive now, I think I paid around $100. for my XFX brand FX5700. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megashrap Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 Well I still say get a better CPU, since it is the cheapest upgrade to buy (at newegg anyway) vs memory. Then go for memory or replace what ya got with DDR memory. Memory well a good amount of it anyway will be higher in price for a few sticks. And i'm basing that on around(512ddr.)It's just plain cheaper to go new CPU, for a great boost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Daddy Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 Yes generally faster is better, however do your homework!! If your Puter was shipped with a MOBO that was at the end of it's line- (meaning it already had the fastest processor it could handle) you might wind up just giving yourself a headache, as returning stuff is generally a pain in the ass. Same goes for the memory, is the mobo designed for ddr sd ram or not? Most MOBO manufacturers will list specs, and upgrade compatabilities, as will ram manufacturers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megashrap Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 Yes i'm quite aware of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Daddy Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 Yes, then I would agree with you, so long as the person has enough 'Puter savvy to know after they drop it in, to get into the bios and change the multiplier so you don't wind up with a mis- match between the cpu clock speed and the memory clock, and wind up inadvertantly overclocking or underclocking the cpu. Especially with the budget mobo's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted September 19, 2004 Author Share Posted September 19, 2004 I think the 128 mb versions of the MX are useless, as the MX isn't fast enough to use all that memory anyway.I bought the Ti 4200 64 mb because it was cheaper than the 128 mb version and had faster RAM.Even if the 128 MB Geforce 4 MMX card only uses 90MB of its 128MB memory that is still better than the 64 MB card Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted September 19, 2004 Author Share Posted September 19, 2004 For all games in general tho.. i would recommend the ($159) ATI RADEON 9700 Pro 128MB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Daddy Posted September 20, 2004 Share Posted September 20, 2004 And voodoo daddy you are correct that the MMX cards are not the best cards in the world... however you dont need the best card in the world to play emperor... and emperor does not have directx 9 features and it does not have pixel shading ..... so there is no reason to pay double the cash to buy an FX card that does directx 9 and pixel shading Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUNWOUNDS Posted September 21, 2004 Author Share Posted September 21, 2004 I think along the same lines as you do with ram, be it system or graphics, more is probably better. Its a proven fact that a slower CPU + More RAM will perform equal to or faster than a faster CPU with less RAM.So yes RAM is a big issue. I know scar said that an easy way to get performance would be to upgrade your CPU but i tihnk the easiest way is to plop in more RAM... and if that doesnt work then get a new CPU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.