ordos45 Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 Okay, it seems every time we end up doing the superweapon debate in an RP/War Thread, this question comes up. So for the next few days I'm keeping this thread open to see what you think. Then we can decide from the total votes if nuclear weapons are superweapons (in an RP/War) or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 Nope, I dont belive they are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rhetoric Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 I believe it depends.If it is an intergalactic war,I say,"Go ahead,nuke all you want."If its like underwater war,I point to a small door in the wall with a pile of bones next to it and say to the person,"You wanna know whats behind that door?"When they nod their head,I say,"You don't wanna know whats behind that door."(I hope you all know who I'm talking about-Gob.He seems to have gotten extra vicious these days ;) ;) ;) ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 Nukes, yes. Chemicals, only in large quantities. Biological, same as chemical. Perhaps we should declare a limit; any weapon that can kill over <insert number> people in one shot is a superweapon. Yes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exatreide Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 Well Then Small nukes, Ect wouldnt be a super weapon if we did it that way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted February 16, 2003 Share Posted February 16, 2003 No, they wouldn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inoculator9 Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 I'd have to say that nukes wouldn't be, although that would depend on the criteria for the thread. If more powerful weapons are available then it wouldn't be, but if nothing else above it is available then it would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 IMO, strategical nukes are, but tactical nukes arne't. I think that a nuke should be able to take out an outpost at most. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Sadukar Posted February 18, 2003 Share Posted February 18, 2003 I thuink it depends on the scale of war Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.