QM

[Dunenewt]

I don't unerstand why all it ever says is

Finding Match

???

How long do you usually have to wait?

[Timenn]

Ages, if there is no one on that moment who did the same options as you. You are the only potential player then... :-

[undsputed]

Timenn is right, there is usually a lack of people playing so you can't find a game. Depending on where your from, try during some peak times....maybe more people will be on during the weekend or in the evening.

7:00 EST is 4:00 PST if your in the US. If your not, that may help you find some good times when people are on.

I tried myself a couple times last week but couldn't find a game. Keep tryin though, sooner or later you'll get lucky.

[Taqwa11]

What bugs me about QM is that the same top players play alot, so you get matched up with them quite often, while those top players apparently aren't playing one another much. What that tells me is that to be highly ranked you not only have to be skilled, but you have to pick and choose your competition. That's why I don't like QM. I hate to duck anyone, but it seems you have to if you want to rack up wins and rank high in QM. Am I right about that, QM players?

[Brennq]

ye i hate it when i can't find a match.

people comon lets play more Qm!!!!!!!!!!! ;D

[Taqwa11]

Just another thought: When people start ducking one another to avoid risky games, of course they will find it difficult to get a QM game. People like me, who aren't great QM players with high rank, can pretty much find a game within five minutes any time we want.

[Marcel71]

What bugs me about QM is that the same top players play alot, so you get matched up with them quite often, while those top players apparently aren't playing one another much. What that tells me is that to be highly ranked you not only have to be skilled, but you have to pick and choose your competition. That's why I don't like QM. I hate to duck anyone, but it seems you have to if you want to rack up wins and rank high in QM. Am I right about that, QM players?

Not true, look at the games from the people ranked from 1 to 10. They almost all played eachother..

[Dunenewt]

Hey Brenq I was going to play you because you said you were going to be on it after that one game

[CERBERUS]

i played any1 i could..never picked choose opponents..however playing the same people over and over does get boring. i assume its worse now.

[Fuzi0n]

Yeah i play anyone but cheaters, and i dont play anyone more then 3 times in a row. No fun playing the same person 3 times, especially a newb.

[Rin0c3rus]

I think that at this point it is ok to have more then 1 login in the ladder...

It will just make more games to play... just look at me i have been on the top for a while and i CANT find a damn qm anymore so i sugest that we allow using atleast an other nick cause this is seriously boring... im spending my time in BC instead cause i think its easier to get a match

I beleive the reason qm is always dead is cause of the 300 point thing... if you have 350 points you need some one with atleast 50 points... in games like YR that rule dosent apply...

P.S i think at this point the use of atleast one more login should be permited :-

[DjCiD]

Yeah its more games played, but its also knocking points from the top of the ladder and pushing othe nicks to the top.

Anyone that has more than one nick in a QM or BC ladder is just lame-o and should be dubbed Nav of the month. We could even make them a tribute page just so they feel special.

If you wanna fool someone with a new/different nick then do it on the Skirmish/Death Match, dont drag it into the QM and BC ladders. They are messed up enuff as is and is in need of some serious house keeping. ^-^