Jump to content

Osama & Friends get Free Pass to Kill

emprworm
 Share

Recommended Posts

Acriku

Acriku

Posted
Posted

Well it is possible that the bombings were due to Spain's involvement in the war, and therefore should be blaming the former Minister, not Bush.

GUNWOUNDS

GUNWOUNDS

Posted
Posted

Well it is possible that the bombings were due to Spain's involvement in the war, and therefore should be blaming the former Minister, not Bush.

You shouldnt be blaming anybody but the terrorists.... blaming others only validates the terrorists.. and their agenda is one not worth acknowledging.  Hence the phrase "we do not negotiate with terrorists".

Caid Ivik

Caid Ivik

Posted
Posted

Both Bush and Qaida are to blame. Bush to put gas in the flames, and Al'Qaida for evident reasons.

Bush wasn't the one who forced kaidists to attacks. Is it some act of evil to be a progressive, economically strong country as USA were? That's all what puts gas into flames of Al-Kaida's rage.

Dante

Dante

Posted
Posted

Responsibility goes deeper than just the people who set off the bombs.

Why do they set of the bombs, who gave them reason to? The person who gave them reason to was...

Bush.

GUNWOUNDS

GUNWOUNDS

Posted
Posted

Responsibility goes deeper than just the people who set off the bombs.

Why do they set of the bombs, who gave them reason to? The person who gave them reason to was...

Bush.

haha that is so wrong .. wrong on so many levels...

the "why" is irrelevant.... the "why" could be that they are setting off bombs because they dont like the fact that IHOP Restaurants serve Bacon for breakfast...

so is IHOP to blame and all Bacon strip cooking must cease?

Absurd?... yes... and so is blaming Bush...

emprworm

emprworm

Posted
  • Author
Posted

"If I killed your wife, and then you killed me, does the why still not matter? "

if you kill my wife, and I then go bomb your entire villiage, and then kill your friends, family, and blow up your workplace.....

no.  the 'why' does not really matter.

GUNWOUNDS

GUNWOUNDS

Posted
Posted

If I killed your wife, and then you killed me, does the why still not matter?

a terrorist does not set off bombs for revenge.... they set off bombs for a political agenda...

my example was more relevant to the topic at hand...

me killing you for killing my wife is justice..... me blowing up an IHOP cause it serves bacon is terrorism not justice...

/thanks try again .....next...

VigilVirus

VigilVirus

Posted
Posted

Terrorists commit terror acts not only because of an agenda, but because of something they believe in and the things that were done to them.

If a government of a country killed my family for example, and I had the means to drop a nuclear device on it, I would do so without hesitation. Some things are not logical, some things are emotional.

emprworm

emprworm

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Terrorists commit terror acts not only because of an agenda, but because of something they believe in and the things that were done to them.

If a government of a country killed my family for example, and I had the means to drop a nuclear device on it, I would do so without hesitation. Some things are not logical, some things are emotional.

and whos fault is it when you drop a nuclear bomb?

its YOURS.  Your decision.  Your action.  Your responsibility. 

when socialist liberals start taking responsibility for their actions this world will be a better place.

when Al-Qaida bombs a train, the fault is with Al-Qaida.

GUNWOUNDS

GUNWOUNDS

Posted
Posted

A political agenda agsinst whom?

here let me put it simply for you....

USA = IHOP

Bush = manager of IHOP

Our culture and what we stand for = Bacon

Osama no likey da bacon

so they set off bombs to get us to change our menu to what they like...

therefore they want to terrorize us to impose their muslim extremism on us..

GUNWOUNDS

GUNWOUNDS

Posted
Posted

You can blame whoever you want, but "picking a fight" is a fault almost as much as that of the guy who beat you up.

your trying to make it personal and direct.....its more politcal and indirect....

thats why its called TERRORISM.

GUNWOUNDS

GUNWOUNDS

Posted
Posted

Terrorism is pretty direct. It's born from fanaticism that is fueled from hatred of something or someone. Usually with a cause.

right it is fueled from a religious belief or religious cause or a political agenda....

THAT IS ALL INDIRECT .... meaning BUSH HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING DIRECT TO THEM... BUSH did NOT slap Osama's mama across the face .... he simply is running a country that has a culture that Osama considers "infidel"

There is nothing BUSH can do to help that... except force everyone in USA to become a muslim....

emprworm

emprworm

Posted
  • Author
Posted

the fact that you reject Allah makes you a target for Jihad.

are you to blame for war now?

sounds like you are defending the "christians" during the spanish inquisition who burned heretics at the stake.  if the heretics would only have converted, then there would be no cause to terrorize them.

the heretics, therefore, are to blame for their own deaths.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.