Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am taking part in a school debate and I was wondering if you guys could give me any points *against* the motion:

This house believes that all police personnel should carry fire-arms.

Also if youve got any good points *for* it they might also be useful (so I know what to expect from the proposition).

Thanks.

Posted

House?

As for the debate, I am totally for it so I will list some *for* positions.

1) Police personnel are at risk from the criminals everyday, so means of self-defense is required.

2) Police personnel may be required for backup when other personnel are busy, so being called into duty they would need their firearm.

Posted

The police don't want to carry weapons. ~5% said they'd leave if they were forced to carry firearms on the beat.

If the proposition argue that it'll boost police numbers, say it'd be endangering society, because anyone who joins so they can carry a gun should not be a policeman...

Those are some things people usually don't think about.

Posted

1) Police personnel are at risk from the criminals everyday, so means of self-defense is required.

2) Police personnel may be required for backup when other personnel are busy, so being called into duty they would need their firearm.

1) They get training don't they? Take self-defence or something. You don't need to kill to defend yourself.

2) Why? To threaten people?

Against;

1) Too dangerous. Not all police are trustworthy you know.

2) Gun = more power = more corruption = more death.

3) What happens if the police person loses a fight and some thug takes their gun?

There's more...

Posted

Thanks all, those are pretty good points =).

Anybody hyave anymore? Especially any statistics.

Oh and Nema could you possibly cite your sources for the statistic you gave?

Posted

Dust try using self-defense with your body to subdue a guy with a gun, the police do not take unnecessary risks like that.

Also, I was talking about high importance cases, like a shootout or bank robbery.

They are making longer-ranging tasers right now, they are extremely effective and there is no way to fight them. http://www.pawneepolice.com/ppd/taser.htm

Posted

I'm afraid I can't remember where I got it from, sorry.

Try searching the BBC - they may have noted such an interesting poll result.

"they are extremely effective and there is no way to fight them"

Yet.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.