Spew All About Politics Here

[emprworm]

Don't count civilians as a force, they are not.

oh you are so wrong. in any INVASION, you can ALWAYS count the local residence of the invaded country as potential militia. And since the local residents of America are the most heavilly armed residents of any country on earth, it makes for a massive legion of an army unto itself.

Even 100 million human beings running up a beach will be pulverized into finely ground hamburger by a few high-yield precision bombs. You would need tens of thousands of TANKS. Yet there is NO WAY to get those tanks here all at once. The US could never be invaded. that you even think it could be is beyond absurd. It is as stupid as me saying that the US could invade the world. utterly stupid.

[emprworm]

bio-warfare would result in the nuclear desttruction of the whole planet since the US would retalliate with full nuclear force. read my opening line (i repeat now)

Conventional invasion = US wins, world loses.

Non-conventional invasion = US loses, World loses

either way, the world loses.

[VigilVirus]

I think you underestimate the rest of the world.

[Sardauker-Kirov]

100 Chinese Special forces = Hmmmm, artillery will be sabotaged, radars will be destroyed? Possibilities are endless, they could give the position of the Stealth bombers to the base?

Read more about strategic warfare.

America has bought most of their technology from other countries like England, Japan, Germany and some other rich countries.

And later they made technology that assembles some of the bough technology.

Missiles can be intercepted you know, they will be easily picked up and shot down. I hope they can say that to the Americans. And I guess the American soldiers has teleportation devices to teleport at every location that is being attacked?

Hmmm, and how many bombers does America has? If they are hard to construct, China and the countries will already have tons of Airplanes.

Besides, if it is against the law, why is my friend shooting in the club with his machine gun? Go call the police.

And I doubt that the stealth bombers will pummel the ships, if they are destroyed.

If America launched missiles towards other countries, America will be literally bombarded down by hundreds of missiles.

[VigilVirus]

US defeating the rest of the world is as rediculous as US defeating terrorism. You have some extreme illusions of grandeur about US, emprworm.

[emprworm]

America has bought most of their technology from other countries like England, Japan, Germany and some other rich countries.

like what? What weapons technology, specifically has america ever bought from anyone?

if you dont answer me (which i dont think you will), i will once again dismiss as lies.

Missiles can be intercepted you know, they will be easily picked up and shot down.

WOW! You are an ignorant one. Missles are NOT EASILY intercepted. Missles can travel undwerwater, low level, or high level. Missles that travel at altitudes near orbit are virtually impossible to shoot down. Yet the US has those kinds of missles- none of your dumb little planes can shoot down any of them.

they can say that to the Americans. And I guess the American soldiers has teleportation devices to teleport at every location that is being attacked?

we will know every location of every single ship as they move slowly on the water. or do you plan on teleporting your slow moving ships?

Hmmm, and how many bombers does America has? If they are hard to construct, China and the countries will already have tons of Airplanes.

the us has tons of airplanes. but we really dont care about an airplane war. we will just destroy your ships with orbital missles which you cannot shoot down. then your planes cannot land.

[emprworm]

US defeating the rest of the world is as rediculous as US defeating terrorism. You have some extreme illusions of grandeur about US, emprworm

you have it backwards. the world trying to invade the US is as rediculous as the world defeating terrorism. If you think the world can invade and take over the US, You have some extreme illusions of grandeur about the world, VigilVirus

[Andrew]

WOW! You are an ignorant one. Missles are NOT EASILY intercepted. Missles can travel undwerwater, low level, or high level. Missles that travel at altitudes near orbit are virtually impossible to shoot down. Yet the US has those kinds of missles- none of your dumb little planes can shoot down any of them.

there is such things as icbm's that take out missles an not just planes.

[DukeLeto]

Total nuclear apocalypse. Any major, world-wide war would end in total nuclear apocalypse. Some stupid third-world dictator wouldn't be able to keep his hand off the trigger, and *BOOM!*, the chain reaction begins.

[emprworm]

there is such things as icbm's that take out missles an not just planes.

an icbm cannot intercept a missle that travels at sub-orbital altitude.

or are you going to tell me which one can?

[VigilVirus]

ROFL. Illusions of grandeur about the world, lol. Man, that's an idiotic comment.

Anyway, the world has a lot more ships and a lot more planes and a lot more troops than US. And anyway, you can also destroy the government. No country can operate without a govt. It would be an anarchy until a dictator comes to power, but there will be a period of weakening in between.

[VigilVirus]

Total nuclear apocalypse. Any major, world-wide war would end in total nuclear apocalypse. Some stupid third-world dictator wouldn't be able to keep his hand off the trigger, and *BOOM!*, the chain reaction begins.

Yes, it would. I totally agree.

[Andrew]

there is such things as icbm's that take out missles an not just planes.

an icbm cannot intercept a missle that travels at sub-orbital altitude.

i beleive that in order for the missle to hit its target it must drop out of orbit and hit the ground( or in air above), so thus an icbm can hit it when it comes out of orbit

[emprworm]

Anyway, the world has a lot more ships and a lot more planes and a lot more troops than US.

big deal. they are all spread out accross vast oceans. they cannot get here. there are not enough warships in the entire world to move 1 billion people at once. and doing so would be REALLY dumb...mass suicide.

[VigilVirus]

First take out the navy and the airforce. Then, mass bmbing and lastly an invasion.

[emprworm]

beleive that in order for the missle to hit its target it must drop out of orbit and hit the ground( or in air above), so thus an icbm can hit it when it comes out of orbit

highly unlikely. the most advanced anti-missle system in the world was the Patriot Missle system. Read this:

The most prominent theater system is the army's Patriot, originally designed to shoot down aircraft and first used in the Persian Gulf War to battle Iraqi Scud missiles. The first generation Patriot - the only theater defense system ever called on in combat - intended to destroy or deflect incoming missiles by exploding an interceptor nearby.

The army claims a 60 percent success rate, but critics counter that the Patriot failed in all its Scud engagements even though the enemy warheads employed no obvious counter-measures.

if you actually think you are going to intercepting all those sub-orbital missles, you are in for a wake up call. MAYBE you get a few of them. But you will suffer MAJOR losses- all occuring long before your ships arrive.

[emprworm]

First take out the navy and the airforce. Then, mass bmbing and lastly an invasion.

lol. how do you take out the US air force? HOW?

[VigilVirus]

With the more numerous airforce of the whole world.

But here are some more facts for ya:

1. Without trade with the rest of the world US economy would crumble completely

2. What is one resource US has very little of? Ah yes, oil. Now, what is any kind of fuel made of?

3. Most of US products are made in other countries, I mean compare how often have you seen "Made in USA" compared to "Made in China".

[DukeLeto]

Here's an idea: Why does everyone want to kill everyone else?! That makes no sense at all!! Why would the US, or China, or England, or Canada, or anyone else want to simply KILL FOR THE SAKE OF KILLING?! JESUS, PEOPLE! THINK!!! >:( >:( >:(

[VigilVirus]

Here's an idea: Why does everyone want to kill everyone else?! That makes no sense at all!! Why would the US, or China, or England, or Canada, or anyone else want to simply KILL FOR THE SAKE OF KILLING?! JESUS, PEOPLE! THINK!!! >:( >:( >:(

Who knows why emprworm started talking about it...

[exatreide]

Perhaps but the US could simply invest greatly in new forms of energy, IE hydrogen cells for cars ect that are already being developed.

you may defeat us but were gona take down 850 million of you danish down with us :)

[Acriku]

Vigil, Kirov started it, so don't blame Empr for that, blame him for continuing it (as well as all of you others).

I think the US has done a pretty good job if there is a discussion on whether or not the US can take on the world.

But my opinion is that no country will stay in the war if they take too many casualties, which they will, unless they are being invaded in which surrender is not an option. The US can get oil from Alaska, while telling all the animal rights activists and others to kiss uncle sam's butt. And do remember the US will not just focus on defending its country, it will do offensive maneuvers possibly forcing some countries back, leaving the rest for the mopup. We have excellent strategists/tacticians on the chain of command and off of it, so we would do a good deal of damage. US is not a country to be reckoned with. But if you have to turn the whole world on the US just to try to defeat it, then I think the US is pretty tough.

[emprworm]

With the more numerous airforce of the whole world.

But here are some more facts for ya:

1. Without trade with the rest of the world US economy would crumble completely

it would be drastically hurt, no doubt, but it would not crumble. There are enough resources in the US to sustain itself. Other countries, once cut from trade AND aid from the US would crumble completely.

2. What is one resource US has very little of? Ah yes, oil. Now, what is any kind of fuel made of?

a reliance that we can easily rid ourselves of very rapidly if we had to. the technology already exists, the push for it so far has not. I would LOVE to see oil dependence severred. This would force already existing US technology to the forefront removing any US reliance on oil.

3. Most of US products are made in other countries, I mean compare how often have you seen "Made in USA" compared to "Made in China".

most is inaccurate. A lot is accurate. There are US companies making products in China that would simply relocate back to the US. Big deal.

[emprworm]

And do remember the US will not just focus on defending its country, it will do offensive maneuvers possibly forcing some countries back, leaving the rest for the mopup. We have excellent strategists/tacticians on the chain of command and off of it, so we would do a good deal of damage. US is not a country to be reckoned with. But if you have to turn the whole world on the US just to try to defeat it, then I think the US is pretty tough.

these are excellent points. THe US has covert capability of its own, and the most advanced military weaponry in the world. I believe the US would be defeated if it tried to INVADE the whole world. Such a thing would be insane. BUt an invastion of the world on the US would also equal complete doom for the world. As hundreds of millions die trying to get here (they would be killed long before their ships could land on US shores), their home countries would be economically and socially devastated, forcing THEIR governments into anarchy. Meanwhile, the US just makes more sub-orbital high-yield missles to continue blowing up north american choke points where ground forces attempt to move (such as the panama canal and the few choke points on the canadian border) and every single battleship on the globe (yes, US missles can reach any point on earth)

[emprworm]

VigilVirus: Who knows why emprworm started talking about it...

ill answer that. Because Sardaukar-Kirov started talking about it.

Emprworm: lol. how do you take out the US air force? HOW?