Sardauker-Kirov Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 And I even doubt America has so many weapons, you are also forgetting with the world combined they can produce more weapons then America, so they can replace the "rocks and sticks".You're too confident in America's arsenal, why you aren't calculating the world's total strenght and weapons. And try throwing armed civilians against armed trained forces and regular soldiers, the civilians will probably be slaughtered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 I'd say of those 100 million citizens only 50% know how to shoot a gun well and only 10% of those 50% would be brave enough to oppose a trained force. And those 5 million that are left would get slaughtered by the enemy - you need more than a handgun to fight a war. ok, you are saying that they would get slaughtered. by who, exactly? how large is your trained force? numbers please.secondly, how in the world did they manage to get here unscathed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 And I even doubt America has so many weapons, you are also forgetting with the world combined they can produce more weapons then America, so they can replace the "rocks and sticks".You're too confident in America's arsenal, why you aren't calculating the world's total strenght and weapons. worlds arsenal? Uhh...what arsenal? Oh yea, China. Is that all you got? Perhaps russia has a few nick nacks here and there, but thats about it.Wait, dont forget the mighty arsenal of Finland! LOL. yea, that will certainly spell our doom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 maybe you dont need a large force. Just read the turner diaries and that explains a scenario about how to take over the world. :P(although it is crazy :-X) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 well the method sardaukar-kirov is talking about is by using weaponry, which the world has very little of.he talks of battleships even! LOL. WHAT battleships? Who exactly owns all these battleships? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 Heh, "much" more then the American trained forces. If you take a look at the country report site, I would say the Americans are outnumbered.Oh wait? Your ignorant brain forgot about Germany, England, France, and all the other europian countries, Japan, Indonesia, thailand. And the list keeps on going.So how many weapons and how much weapons are the Americans capable to produce, you tell me please.Hmmm, the civilians gets slaughtered by the enemy, while the American army has been crushed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 And I even doubt America has so many weapons, you are also forgetting with the world combined they can produce more weapons then America, so they can replace the "rocks and sticks".You're too confident in America's arsenal, why you aren't calculating the world's total strenght and weapons. worlds arsenal? Uhh...what arsenal? Oh yea, China. Is that all you got? Perhaps russia has a few nick nacks here and there, but thats about it.Wait, dont forget the mighty arsenal of Finland! LOL. yea, that will certainly spell our doom.We're talking about the whole world here. France+England+Russia+Japan+China+Italy+Spain+countries of Middle East+all the other countries you can only think of.The production rate of the whole world is a lot bigger than that of US Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 much more? hardly. they barely have any trained military at all. how many trained troops does France have? what 10,000 at the most? and no way to get here.you plan on sending them all at once or just a chunk at a time? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 much more? hardly. they barely have any trained military at all. how many trained troops does France have? what 10,000 at the most? and no way to get here.you plan on sending them all at once or just a chunk at a time?How about gather them in Canada and Mexico and attack jointly from the sides? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 i thought of all those people. I thoght of 1 billion africans carrying sticks and old muskets, trying to get to america...but wait, they cant. or did you and kirov have some kind of teleportation device you were going to use? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 i thought of all those people. I thoght of 1 billion africans carrying sticks and old muskets, trying to get to america...but wait, they cant. or did you and kirov have some kind of teleportation device you were going to use?Like I said, gather in Canada and Mexico. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 where in Canada? do you even have any idea about canadian terrain? You are going to rally 1 billion people in the Yukon? LOL. No fighting necessary. they all die from the environment.and how did you get 1 billion people into the Yukon anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 Yeah, but he thinks American's have a "unbeatable" army. Hmmmm, Guerilla warfare? Today's technology still have problems with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 how do you get them in mexico? The US will control the panama canal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 oooh guerilla warfare. the problem with that is that we already have thousands of troops out in the world. you have no troops here in the US. WE will be the ones using guerilla tactics on the world. Since China is your primary, #1 source for the success of this war, we guerilla china first. then all your hopes come crashing down.Uh oh. no china. you lose then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 On transport ships. They could probably land on US soil too - don't think anyone would notice them, US does not every second guard every inch of its coasts. The key is not to declare war and let US ready for the war - element of surprise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 transport ships...?lol. lets see: 1-2 billion people requires about 1 MILLION transport shipsONE MILLION TRANSPORT SHIPS will evade US satellite detection?ROFLyou guys are soooo funnythanks for the good humor today. i like laughter. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 oooh guerilla warfare. the problem with that is that we already have thousands of troops out in the world. you have no troops here in the US. WE will be the ones using guerilla tactics on the world. Since China is your primary, #1 source for the success of this war, we guerilla china first. then all your hopes come crashing down.Uh oh. no china. you lose then.US has almost no chance of invading and defeating China. No Chance. There are just too many people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 transport ships...?lol. lets see: 1-2 billion people requires about 1 MILLION transport shipsONE MILLION TRANSPORT SHIPS will evade US satellite detection?ROFLyou guys are soooo funnythanks for the good humor today. i like laughter. :DDude, who said anything about a billion men????Several hundred thousand well trained soldiers would be enough for first attack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 lol. i never talked about invading china, only destroying their MILITARY capability (easilly done). China has too many unarmed impoverished people. easy pickings. but we wont invade them. nearly all those 1 billion people have ZERO military capability. we ALREADY have planes based near china- they have basically no air force at all. They will be aerially bombed, wiping out their military capability long before you can use china to stage some massive 1 million transport ships to 'stealth' their way to the US. ROFL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 Yeah, you're fighting China's troops in their own land? You took your medicines? Hmmmm, sorry my friend, but the China would easily destroy the troops inside their land, since they know everything about it and what's this? America soldiers got killed booohooooo.... :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 lol. i never talked about invading china, only destroying their MILITARY capability (easilly done). China has too many unarmed impoverished people. easy pickings. but we wont invade them. nearly all those 1 billion people have ZERO military capability. we ALREADY have planes based near china- they have basically no air force at all. They will be aerially bombed, wiping out their military capability long before you can use china to stage some massive 1 million transport ships to 'stealth' their way to the US. ROFLThat would be stupid, because China has nukes and they would launch them. And no the SDI will not be built until at least 10 more years pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emprworm Posted December 4, 2002 Author Share Posted December 4, 2002 Several hundred thousand well trained soldiers would be enough for first attack your ONLy chance to win is to dump 1 billion people on our shores at once. 1 million soldiers - basically most of your entire trained army of the world - will perish long before they arrive. that is still about 1000 transport ships. not a chance ...not a single chance they get here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 Wouldn't the planes be destroyed by ground forces? Maybe that you forgot about it, since America's troops will get killed by China's own troops in their "own" country. Sure, emperor worm, I'm sure your army has the ability to clone themselves and be at all places in a snap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilVirus Posted December 4, 2002 Share Posted December 4, 2002 Question for you, oh bright one. How many soldiers does US have?? The maximum it can be is about 2 million. Now think how spread out they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.