DukeLeto Posted July 28, 2002 Author Posted July 28, 2002 When was that?StarCraft, technicly the goodguys wonand either way it doesn't matter if good guys or badguys won in a story, i mean goodguys winning has been TOTALLY WAY-OVER DONEYou ain't played Brood War, where the Zerg destroy the Terrans and Protoss, have you?
Edric O Posted July 28, 2002 Posted July 28, 2002 They don't destroy NOTHING! :)Kerrigan just destroys the UED... and a fleet Arcturus somehow managed to scrape up, and one of the mighty Protoss fleets. But other than these losses, the Terran and the Protoss are very much alive and well.
DukeLeto Posted July 28, 2002 Author Posted July 28, 2002 They don't destroy NOTHING! :)Kerrigan just destroys the UED... and a fleet Arcturus somehow managed to scrape up, and one of the mighty Protoss fleets. But other than these losses, the Terran and the Protoss are very much alive and well.So other than the loss of their entire armies and millions of lives, they're all just fine? ;D
Edric O Posted July 28, 2002 Posted July 28, 2002 Like I said, only the UED got smashed into oblivion.Artanis was completely okay, and so was Arcturus. Apparently the Terrans have unlimited manpower... (I mean, come on, they lost bazillions of men and STILL put up a fight) and the Protoss lie low for a while.But here's what I don't understand about Starcraft:WTF happened to all the Protoss colony worlds?? Don't tell me the Protoss only have Aiur and Shakuras! That's ridiculous!
Desert_Eagle25 Posted July 29, 2002 Posted July 29, 2002 The Protoss have hundred's of colony worlds. And trust me,it was a fucking war you fool, ppl die in wars. The main point is that they survived and that they need to re-root themselves and bind-up their wounds.And i have played Brood-War :PAnd are you saying that in a war when they battle, that entire fleets and armies aren't killed? :P
Desert_Eagle25 Posted July 29, 2002 Posted July 29, 2002 Also, there were civil forces, good protoss, bad protoss, good terran, bad terran.
Terror Posted July 29, 2002 Posted July 29, 2002 A couple of points:1. in Warcraft 1 the orcs win, not the humans2. over 80% of all protoss on their homeworld Aiur were killed3. Arcturus was pretty much fucked... he lost general duke
Seal89999 Posted July 30, 2002 Posted July 30, 2002 Tiberian Sun most definatily!Easyer to understand.Like the sidebar.The story is better.Like the forces alot better too.(Total Nod fan!!)Just better game all together.
Terror Posted July 30, 2002 Posted July 30, 2002 :) heh yeah well.. we all have opinions... there is no way to messure it.. so we'll just have to solve this problem by bitching heheh
Desert_Eagle25 Posted July 31, 2002 Posted July 31, 2002 Better plot?I think not ;DTiberian Sun is about some evil army trying to take over the world or some shit.WC3 shows the story of redemption, savior, and friendship.(i wont tell the rest of story cuz it's a uber spoiler)
DukeLeto Posted July 31, 2002 Author Posted July 31, 2002 Better plot?I think not ;DTiberian Sun is about some evil army trying to take over the world or some shit.WC3 shows the story of redemption, savior, and friendship.So, basically, "that sh*t." It's still about the Undead trying to take over, is it not? And they are evil, are they not? Hmm...Infact, all the WarCrafts have been about SOMEONE trying to take over Azeroth. Again, hmm...
Desert_Eagle25 Posted July 31, 2002 Posted July 31, 2002 but in TibSun it's one big plot. In WC3 it's plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots, and plots within plots*huff, huff, huff* ;D
Caid Ivik Posted July 31, 2002 Posted July 31, 2002 Silly people, open eyes! You're trying to find a philosophical gifts in such commercial fruits as TS or WC3?Anyway, TS is at least fun. It shows real modern warfare based on smaller numbers of elite warriors (look at Afghanistan, Kosovo). WC3 isn't good show of medieval warfare. In those times weren't smaller armies then Macciaveli's "optimal 24000 men". Try Shogun: Total War or Age of Empires, they are realistic, yet it lacks some fantasy.
Terror Posted July 31, 2002 Posted July 31, 2002 That is not the point.. WC3 is fantasy... TS is unrealistic... but nobody cares, at least as it's fun.... TS has stupid units.
Desert_Eagle25 Posted July 31, 2002 Posted July 31, 2002 sum1 salute Terror, i need a new arm ;DSee, WC3 isn't based on just medievil sh!t...the whole thing is fantasy, it's not based way back in the dark ages, like we had purple elves in the dark ages ::)
DukeLeto Posted August 1, 2002 Author Posted August 1, 2002 Hmm...This seems to be becoming an anti-WestWood flame thread, and, as such, I think I shall lock it now...We seem to be getting nowhere, anyways...
exatreide Posted August 6, 2002 Posted August 6, 2002 well.westerwoooden dose deserve to be placed in a gibbet for the rest of eternity.....but come on sc is way better. its like which is better chicken or lobster. its a oxy moron question. sc wins hands down.hurls dead animals at westwood's gibbet.
nemafakei Posted August 6, 2002 Posted August 6, 2002 Ex, please try to put some reasons behind your assertions. Else there's little point posting.
DukeLeto Posted August 6, 2002 Author Posted August 6, 2002 how did this get unlocked in the first place? ??? Hmm...Well I'll be lockin' it back now...
Recommended Posts