d3m0nger Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 I compared it like this : a tauren costs way more so you have no money to get it level 3. A grunt costs less so you have the money to upgrade it. in some cases if you go tauren you have money to upgrade them. but then the guy with the grunts would have the same amount wasted on his grunts, so it would end up in a big battle : 30 grunts/docs/whatever vs 8 tauren/docs/whatevr, the first group will definitly win
thomas Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 hmm i rarely use tauren usually i'll have lots of grunts and HH some raiders ( dont gt them they have barely more hp than a grunt and knights are wayy better.
Terror Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 I compared it like this : a tauren costs way more so you have no money to get it level 3. A grunt costs less so you have the money to upgrade it. in some cases if you go tauren you have money to upgrade them. but then the guy with the grunts would have the same amount wasted on his grunts, so it would end up in a big battle : 30 grunts/docs/whatever vs 8 tauren/docs/whatevr, the first group will definitly win30 grunts = 90 supply, you never get that :)anyway. Taurens can often well be worth the price, especially cuz of their crushing skill. They more vulnerable vs. piercing attackers, but when fighting knights, abominations, skeletons, etc. i'd rather have about 3 Taurens in my army
d3m0nger Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 Well it seems you have not found the light yet hehe, u'll see it sooner or later tauren suck ass.. and u'll use them less often every time you play orc's. Anyway for more tips you schould ask cerb3erus, he's a better orc player then me anyway.
Terror Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 ^-^ light or no light. Some people use the tauren very effective, some don't... it's just your style of play.btw, a grunt never does more than 40 damage.. the maximum is 33 or something (lvl3 grunt)
Andrew Posted January 3, 2003 Posted January 3, 2003 Custom games are good but NEVER EVER play LoTR game, they always suck.um, does lotr stand for lords of the realm or lord of the rings?
Desert_Eagle25 Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 Tauren are good in certain situations and suck in others. Tauren usually own ground no matter what the type of armour, just get a couple docs.
Terror Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 um, does lotr stand for lords of the realm or lord of the rings?Lord of the Rings :)Lords of the Realm (2) is cool though :) . I can't wait for Lords of the Realm III to come out. You played it Andrew?
Andrew Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 i havnt played lord of the realm 3 yet. i have lotr 2 and also downloaded lotr 1.
Terror Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 i havnt played lord of the realm 3 yet. i have lotr 2 and also downloaded lotr 1. yeah sorry, i meant lotr 2. Lotr 3 ain't out yet. I never played lotr 1 though. I heard that lotr2 was better anyway. Besides, it is a lot newer.
Andrew Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 yes. lotr 2 is better if you like the better graphics and easier playability. lotr1 is more complex(which can be fun) and you can create your own castle.
thomas Posted January 4, 2003 Posted January 4, 2003 war of the ring, batle of mt doom, and helms deep v6.0-7.5 are good lotr games others are crap
DukeLeto Posted January 4, 2003 Author Posted January 4, 2003 I just got it. I guess the group cap isn't such s problem, since you don't need that many units anyways. It's pretty cool, though the camera controls suck royally.I'm lowlymarine on B.NET
Recommended Posts