Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Who knows about Quantum Physics, Chemistry. etcI'm checking some books of them now.And a question if you know about Atomics, Is the form of a Atomic proven, In other words. Is it possible to See a Atom under a Microscope? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ligic_Tha_Master Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 If you have a microscope accurate enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMA_1 Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 the answer is no. I have asked my professor before. The electron microscopes can only go down to certain polymers. like chromosomes. We know atoms exist because of the mathematics involved and tests that show their existance without seeing them. heck we have mathematically proven there are subatomic particals inside those protons in atoms! :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 13, 2002 Author Share Posted March 13, 2002 Yes i readed about that. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 We see reactions by, e.g. reversing polarity in a vacuum, etc, and deducted there has to be particles doing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 13, 2002 Author Share Posted March 13, 2002 Some guy also says, "Taychon" has the speed of light. Or something like that, What is that thing actualy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Tha tachyon particle is a particle that defies all laws and goes as fast as light, or faster than light. It is pure hypothetical, and laws state that it is impossible to do without having infinite energy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardauker-Kirov Posted March 13, 2002 Author Share Posted March 13, 2002 Some kind of Beam? Hmmmmmmm *thinks and druwls* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gryphon Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Well, somthing like that. It's a partical that has a speed greater than the speed off licht. It never had a speed below "lichtspeed" so it didn't have to break the barrier [ witch is impossible ]. It's already beyond the barrier and thus doesn't have to have invinante mass or the other things that come with passing the speed of light.Could you explain what you mean with "atoms".Because to the translation [ into Dutch ] you could be refering to protons, electrons / quarks or molecules.So just to be on the safe side and I know witch you are talking about.:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 According to my resources, the particle has to have an infinite energy either way. But let's not get into another argument... ;) Also, if we could figure out how to contain these particles, if existing, who knows how exponential the affect could be on our advancements. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gryphon Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Ok, we're not going to argue ;)The weird thing is that the also could be traveling "back" in time [ in relation towards our direction of time ]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 It's been done in minOOte proportions with beams of particles going "close" to the speed of light. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gryphon Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 You mean while still traveling below the speed of light ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Yeah, it was very close to the speed, but wasn't. I think, from memory, the particles were shot through a gun of some sort, and appeared back in it's place. Something like that, I forget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gryphon Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Never heard of that. Do you remember who, or what institute did the test. [ I might be able to find it then ]I don't know what to think of those things myself. It's just like the AI clesses that I had.One comes to tell you it's possible, and the next week you'll hear that it isn't. If that isn't weird enough the use the same arguments [ basically the same ] and the week after [ so week 3 in the explenation ]you hear that it's possible [ again ].The science is making progress with the subject but their or still different theory's that are going on next to eatch other.So it does fasinates me, but I can't come to any conclusions about these subject.:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 This was something I heard years ago. But that's all I know. Also, I read in my New York Times Science Reference Book that if we couild detect ahd harness them, that would mean INSTANT communication. Think of the download speeds! And yeah, I agree, so many theories and so little conclusions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gryphon Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Just wondering.What's your "New York Times Science Reference Book" ?A psrt of the news agancy, school book [ advanced or middle doesn't matter ], magazine or sutch ?And one of the things that QM is suggestion can be used as instant communication. The movement of a partical here could be in direct relation to the same [ or 90 - 180 deg. ] movement of a partical hundred's of lightyears away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acriku Posted March 13, 2002 Share Posted March 13, 2002 Sorry, the real title is Science Desk Reference from The New York Public Library. It is an awesome book, and don't ask where I got the New York Times part from... :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.