Jump to content

ace1gold

Fedaykin
  • Posts

    111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Location
    Reading
  1. when u say classic do u mean roc? ive seen some replays of top tourny games they look fun. Problem with wc3 is i find i dont get addicted, i get bored after 10-20 games each time i take it up. you know what the biggest replay site for wc3 is?
  2. yeah but surely its dead as a dodo? dont u play any competition or do you just ffg?
  3. im playing zh, as much as i want to get into wc3 i jst find it boring
  4. cool to see you guys have found a way to keep the game alive, we have a similar system going on tib sun for the members who still play, keep up the good work
  5. probably runs slow cause u got a geforce 2 you need better graphic card and 512 ram if u wanna get some speed on generals
  6. lol well what i meant was i was dissapointed with 1 and pleased with the other, if i was comparing them i wld have shown the advantages and disadvantages off both.. anyways moving on with the topic again...
  7. when did i compare a tnt to a radeon? u asked me what cards i had and i said id had a tnt, im not comparing it im merely pointing out i wasnt impressed with it
  8. well if u read the generals forums nearly all of the graphics card problems are ati card ones but whether thats to do with driver support or generals being geared around nvidia i dont know. i think ati is the better option if ur more of an expert user as u will know how to fine tune it and u can get better performance but obviously if ur looking for support and that ur probably right nivida is the way to go, i had a geforce 3 and a tnt and the tnt was awful and led to choppy video signs, i just wasnt impressed resolution performance was low whereas when i got my ati radeon it was awesome from the word go and i havent had 1 problem on any game ive tried it with, including generals emperor war craft 3 renegade etc i think the 1 they gave me was a super happy nice working card ;)
  9. and your right nyar i stick to what ive had good experience with, i like u are an asus fan altho i defected from intel after the shit p3 and got an athlon.
  10. lol ive read it at several sources ages ago when generals 1st came out on the official boards, i didnt mean it was designed especially for it just saying it was designed with nvidia users more in mind than ati users. i.e that the performance of the game would be superior on a nvidia card as opposed to an ati 1, of course it may be totally wrong im just telling u what i read, im not gonna go trauling through the 1000s of topics trying to find it i dont have the time, and nyar ive never had 1 single problems getting drivers for my ati radeon and the amount of problems i had with the nvidia cards was greater than that of my ati, the quality of the ati is fabulous..
  11. i have had several nvidia cards and only 1 ati card and i can tell you from my experience ati takes nvidia cards to the cleaners, dont be put off by negative stories from generals about ati cards because generals was designed around the nvidia cards not the ati ones...
  12. well living in europe we had these dvd style cases for ages and i agree with u sven i hate them, the big cardboard box 1s were soo much better i really wish they would be cardboard once again but nevermind eh
  13. sorry appollyon i misread ur post
  14. i meant that they are both 3d engines as opposed to the 2d 1, i didnt mean they were the same engine
×
×
  • Create New...