Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Instead of talking about what is already known, that the US is likely to take control, I think it is time to get to the dissidence point that's coming. I don't believe in the three bloody-handed guys USA proposed for after Saddam. I guess I needed to show what the US administration does in Afghanistan (promised not fulfilled) so here's "Taliban reviving structure in Afghanistan" from Kathy Gannon (http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2003/04/07/taliban/index.html):

April 7, 2003

Posted

As far as a post-Saddam Iraq goes these organizations should play roles in control for the emerging governmental body of Iraq, Iraqi National Congress, Kurdish Democratic Party, Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, the National Accord, composed of former military and intelligence officers, and the Constitutional Monarchy Movement. Outsing Saddam is not a problem for the US the problem is how to keep an already fragile country from becoming more problematic.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.