Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Ah, so what if the world simply declares an all-out blockade? Laying a siege. Starving your economy.

You see, there are more ways to wage a war than simply charging blindly at your enemy.

Well the US probably assumes enemy strategists have the intelligence of a goldfish.

If you need a new name for the operation against Iraq, may I suggest

"Market-Garden II"? ;D

Posted

First of all, owning a gun does not make you half a match for a professional soldier.

true, but maybe i wasn't clear enough on my point. I was trying to point out that in addition to all the professionally trained domestic police and military, you ALSO have 100 million armed citizens as well. Not to mention that any invading force will be on unfamiliar territory. There is just no way America could be invaded. Any attempt at invasion would be annihilated long before even one European soldier was able to set foot on American soil.

Posted

Oh, so I see, a "communist" is someone who disagrees with you.

i'm not defending my remark. I admit that my remark was out of taste. What I am saying is that I will not accept correction from someone who practices a similar double standard. Edric you incessantly insult the US and Americans with critical insulting prejudicial remarks. Now, I dont take any of it personally. And when I do the same thing, even though it is not justified, you are the last person that I am going to listen to try and put me in my place. Set the example first before you condemn judmental remarks from me. You nit-pick my remarks as to ensure none of them contain any elements of generalizations, yet your own remarks are as broad based and sweeping as a giant galactic broom. Its really odd that you cannot even see it.

Alright. When I'll see you not holding a double standard with countries such as Iraq or North Korea, I will correct myself.

and what double standard is that? And why, after admitting that you require correction, do you then imply that your 'correctness' is dependent upon someone else. How about just being correct regardless of someone else's double standard?

Until then, I reserve the right to defend my own against the enemy.

what enemy?

Posted

Okay Emperor worm, before you overload yourself with your 'imagination' about "mighty" America.

1 - It is very easy to get new weapons in these days, China is armed with reasonable powerful weapons.

2 - Oh, and you are forgetting something, America isn't the only one with the big guns and artillery. If America is bombarded by hundreds of battle ships or Jet fighters, not to mention, a huge invasion of troops on every side of the sea, from mexico, canada. They will be literally overun by the soldiers.

3 - Canada will take up alot of resources to conquer, and makes America more likely to be invaded.

4 - I am not a COMMUNIST. Just because, you are so obsessed with America and you call everybody a Communist, doesn't mean they have to be a communist, everybody has his own opinions and thoughts about America. My thoughts are this; I hate the way how America treats the world, just like a spinning doll in the hands of a cat. The cat decides when to do stuff to the doll and the doll just hangs there doing nothing, until fire begins to warm up in the doll and lits the cat on fire. ( I know, strange words. :) )

5 - My Kirov nick is Russian yes, but it is just a "nick", and I like the name, and if you got a problem with Russians go cry a river. And another thing..... I am Dutch.

6 - The weapons you showed is nothing compared to my friends their weapons. They have AK-47's to M4A1 and high quality sniper rifles. In short; they can receive all weapons whenever they want.

7 - I would love to see you fight against 1,000 of soldiers running up to your house. And like EdricO says, war can be won through different ways.

8 - Americans destroying cities, yeah and suddenly the world is notified about the destruction and pours down thousands of troops on the unsuspecting Americans, whiping them out with their own weapons.

9 - You can better call my friends Anti American and the strange

part is.... most of them "are" American.

And as for Acriku, I think that would be a good percentage yes, I was just calculating the total army of the Americans in different bases.

Posted

Well Kirov was more popular then Stalin with the party. A few days after a party vote, wich wasn't advantagous for Stalin, Kirov got shot, by "foul, capitalist saboteurs" and Stalin made an emotional speech in honour of his trusted, close friend Kirov ::).

Posted

1 - It is very easy to get new weapons in these days, China is armed with reasonable powerful weapons.

no citizen in china owns a weapon. Scroll up and look at my weapons again. How many chinese citizens own weapons that can beat my weapons? We have 100 MILLION citizens (not counting military) that own weapons. There isn't even 100 million Chinese soldiers in all of China. 1

2 - Oh, and you are forgetting something, America isn't the only one with the big guns and artillery.

America has the most artillery. But who cares about artillery? It has a range of just a few kilometers. Even the big railroad gun of Germany only had a range of about 150KM. Your artillery is useless across an ocean.

If America is bombarded by hundreds of battle ships or Jet fighters

impossible. One single fleet of stealth bombers would annihilate a thousand battleships before they even got 2000km within range.

not to mention, a huge invasion of troops on every side of the sea

Every side of the sea? LOL. Every boat will be destroyed LONG before it gets here. Your boats travel at just a few KM per hour and are easilly spotted on radar. All those little soliders cramped up on those big ships. Sitting ducks. You would never ever get to shore.

, from mexico, canada. They will be literally overun by the soldiers.

I already mentioned that Canada would be easilly overrun. Not to mention there are only a few access points from canada to the US- the rest is intensely mountainous terrain- impossible for any army to cross. You will be restricted to established land routes which will be choke points. Canada is not an armed country and would have no chance at all. Any ships from Europe trying to reach Canada as a launching point would be annihilated long before they arrived. Mexico is also a choke point. There are no "fronts" in Mexico. If the US wanted to, it could take one single battallion of tanks and push all the way down to the Panama Canal, sealing off any chance you have at a multi-front war.

Canada will take up alot of resources to conquer, and makes America more likely to be invaded.

invasion is impossible without ships. all of which will be blown out of the water. with 100 million armed americans plus a giant miliatary, you will need at least 1 billion armed people invading the US. there is no way you will EVER get 1 billion ARMED people here. The only way you could do it is by boat. Every single boat will be destroyed.

6 - The weapons you showed is nothing compared to my friends their weapons. They have AK-47's to M4A1 and high quality sniper rifles. In short; they can receive all weapons whenever they want.

then your friends are owning them illegally. If your friends are illegal lawbreakers, it only tells me what kind of low life scum you are. You make friends with criminals. You are scum to me. I am not a criminal. To own weapons in your country, you must break the law. This means that not many people in your counry is armed. And your friends break the law. What kind of friends do you have? You associate with criminals, I would report you to the police if I knew who you were.

I would love to see you fight against 1,000 of soldiers running up to your house.

those soliders would never even make it. their ship would be destroyed long before it arrived.

And like EdricO says, war can be won through different ways.

only by boat. that is the ONLy way you can get 1 billion armed people here. Unless you plan on using a spaceship or teleport device. LOL

- You can better call my friends Anti American and the strange

since your friends all own machine guns illegally, I'll call them criminals and terrorists, and I'll call you a vile criminal as well since you associate with them. And you better watch what you say- if you start talking about illegal activities, remember that Gob has your IP address and can report you to your countries authorities. If I knew who your friends were, I'd report them. I would enjoy seeing them go to jail.

Posted

Edric you incessantly insult the US and Americans with critical insulting prejudicial remarks. Now, I dont take any of it personally. And when I do the same thing, even though it is not justified, you are the last person that I am going to listen to try and put me in my place.

I only insult and incessantly attack the US and its corrupt leaders. Not the American people. I never meant to offend the American people in any way. I do, however, mean to offend the unjust regime which rules your country (as well as mine).

and what double standard is that? And why, after admitting that you require correction, do you then imply that your 'correctness' is dependent upon someone else. How about just being correct regardless of someone else's double standard?

A few lines above you just said that you will not listen to my corrections because I have a double standard as well. Now you are telling me to do the exact opposite. Make up your mind.

As for the double standard, I am referring to the repeated warnings by the US and Britain that Iraq and North Korea should not be allowed to have nukes, when they themselves (the US and Britain) have huge nuclear stockpiles and (in the case of the US) have even used them in the past!

Now I'm not saying we should allow dictators to do whatever they want. I'm only saying it's about time some governments see their own hypocrisy and get rid of their own nukes!

what enemy?

Capitalism and its supporters. My political enemies. In this particular case, I'm referring to one of the political enemies I respect the most. Namely you.

Posted

Quit your pathetic patriotism, emprworm. It won't do you any good. US is not strong enough to oppose every country in the world and it is also not dumb enough.

Also quit calling people communist, even if they are. I mean every person has a right to believe in whatever they want. Your remarks are extremely bigoted and prejudist.

Posted
no citizen in china owns a weapon. Scroll up and look at my weapons again. How many chinese citizens own weapons that can beat my weapons? You have 100 MILLION citizens (not counting military) that own weapons. There isn't even 100 million Chinese soldiers in all of China.

No peasant militia will ever make a difference in a all out war these days. Besides, China has a sizable force of military police.

Every side of the sea? LOL. Every boat will be destroyed LONG before it gets here. Your boats travel at just a few KM per hour and are easilly spotted on radar. All those little soliders cramped up on those big ships. Sitting ducks. You would never ever get to shore.

Even stealth planes can be picked up at close range.

And like EdricO says, war can be won through different ways.

only by boat. that is the ONLy way you can get 1 billion armed people here. Unless you plan on using a spaceship or teleport device. LOL

There is still the element of surprise, wich can negate even the best defenses if used properly.

Posted
I do, however, mean to offend the unjust regime which rules your country (as well as mine).

Hey, did you know Bush didn't actually won because he got the most votes? Gore got the most votes of all candidates. Bush only won because of the winner-takes-all system.

Posted
Quit your pathetic patriotism, emprworm. It won't do you any good. US is not strong enough to oppose every country in the world and it is also not dumb enough.

no. the rediculous idea of the US vs. the World was proposed by the us-hating Sardaukar-Kirov.

I am taking the preposterous idea to its conclusion. And you will NOT tell me to quit my patriotism. If you loathe your country...if you hate the place that you live...thats your problem. Dont go around asking other people to hate their home just becuse of your own miserable land.

i dont get offended if Nema were to say "I love the Netherlands. "

It doesn't bother me if a Canadian were to say "Beautiful British Columbia!"

I dont mind if someone says "Australia Rules!"

if you are so weak that you cannot tolerate someone ele's love for their home, that is to your discredit and own weakness.

Even stealth planes can be picked up at close range.

Earthnuker, I think that you are smart enough to realize the immense tactical absurdity of trying to move a billion armed people via ship accross the ocean to invade the US. I think that you are smart enough to realize the immense futility of such an attempt. Even in the wildest scenario that scores of ships travel 2000km unscathed by submarines, long range missles, and aircraft- assuming that millions of these invaders land, there will be unbelievable amounts of land-based weaponry waiting for them as they exit their boats.

Posted
Earthnuker, I think that you are smart enough to realize the immense tactical absurdity of trying to move a billion armed people via ship accross the ocean to invade the US. I think that you are smart enough to realize the immense futility of such an attempt. Even in the wildest scenario that scores of ships travel 2000km unscathed by submarines, long range missles, and aircraft- assuming that millions of these invaders land, there will be unbelievable amounts of land-based weaponry waiting for them as they exit their boats.

Duh, I never said any war against the US would be smart. If I were to say what sort of measure would be taken against the US, I'd say a complete boycot, wich would weaken the US considerably. Who cares for the US anyway :P

Posted
Your patriotism is not based on facts. You view US as an utopia which it is not.

my patriotism is based upon my appreciation for my home. and you are out of line to condemn someone else for loving the place they live just because you might be miserable.

Posted
I'm not miserable. I'm just thinking realistically while the patriotism clouds your judgement

clouds what judgment? i tactically analyzed the futility of 1 billion people trying to cross europe by ship to invade the US. I judged that such an attempt would utterly fail.

my patriotism had nothing to do with that judment.

you need to be more specific before you make accusations, else dont even bother.

Posted

what other ways? If you accuse my thinking of being clouded, then start making some clear statements. Just how is the world going to defeat the US?

terrorism?

hardly!

that would also make the entire world a bunch of evil terrorists. I would think that the majority of people in the world would not resort to that kind of dishonorable barbarism, but who knows...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.