Jump to content

[Closed/Finished] Mercenary Campaign - Fall of Emperor


Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/30/2018 at 2:50 PM, Fey said:

Hey, there ain't nothing wrong with the original style of gameplay! I love variation, myself, but too much S2V2 or S3B1 is gonna get old too. You could try changing up the set-up, like enemy MCVs fly in and then start building up and stuff. You can custom-tailor an AI to build in whatever order you'd like and use tech level / build rate events to make adjustments, like an AI that builds buildings until the last one in the tech tree, then uses all that stockpiled Spice to pump out units at build rate 1! Eh?

Expand  

The best thing with non-base-vs-base is I don't need much time to test! Easy life.

Anyway, this is a RTS after all, so it's hard to go long without some kind of base-vs-base mission. However, I won't let the player to deal with 3-4 base-vs-base mission straight, I'll try to spice things up if I do.

Posted
  On 3/30/2018 at 3:34 PM, Runtowin said:

The best thing with non-base-vs-base is I don't need much time to test! Easy life.

Anyway, this is a RTS after all, so it's hard to go long without some kind of base-vs-base mission. However, I won't let the player to deal with 3-4 base-vs-base mission straight, I'll try to spice things up if I do.

Expand  

I know the feel, man. :P You done much tinkering with the AI yet? You know how to fine-tune the build order?

Posted
  On 3/30/2018 at 3:42 PM, Fey said:

I know the feel, man. :P You done much tinkering with the AI yet? You know how to fine-tune the build order?

Expand  

Yes. One of my mission (currently) has that feature.

I already planned the settings of the next 4 missions (8-->11). You can expect more of that.

Posted
  On 3/30/2018 at 1:42 PM, Runtowin said:

Moreover, you don't need your north base intact to win. In fact, it's a bit easier if you left it destroyed.

Expand  

Well, the last time I lost that part of the base and I couldn't win (Or the Atreides couldn't). Also, no tanks or those free deliveries they are given from time to time, so I was trying to avoid loosing that part at least at the beggining.

Also also, I have more stuff in the right part of the base because I was trying to take the other imperial base, but didn't left the other totally unprotected. If those units went to the right part (and being helped by the smuggler) I could take them out, but that part just me alone I can't; at that point I have more or less the same number of units that him; but of course, for my quad he has a devastator and for a infantry he has a Sardaukar. I would need to have double the units that him to not loose buildings.

Maybe next time I try a different tactic, not caring about the heavy factory at all (capturing it so the enemy lost a few units trying to kill the free tanks given) but that's all, and then luring the enemy into the smuggler base or something; I don't know, Atreides loosing most of the enemies on a futile attack didn't help (I mean, in that imagen one of his harverster it's being attacked but they barely came with 2 combat tanks, 1 quad... so I couldn't receive some help).

Posted

Played mission 6. Lots of scout indeed and even more saves to do. Not even those Sierra games did me save so often T_T.

No need to cover with spoiler, besides being hitted (or killed) a few times, I only needed 2 tries to destroy all the stuff needed.

Do you think you can add a %timer on the mission failed - Raider event? When the raider it's destroyed my first reaction was to press "esc" to bring up the menu and load the save. However the game just give me the "mission failed" and quit the game.

Just a few seconds of room; so if I see the raider exploting I can reload the game instatly (but if I don't, the game just ended like normal).

  Reveal hidden contents

Also, I am half mission 7: I can tell your campaign it's overall pretty hard. It's really hard to paid attention to so many fronts.

  Reveal hidden contents

Probably I am halfway the mission, or at least I hope there isn't any more surprises for this level.

Posted
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted (edited)
  On 3/31/2018 at 3:14 PM, Runtowin said:

I see. Never know this.

Expand  

Yes, the play sound includes all the sound effects but also dialogue lines. I remember there was a "territory lost" line or something like that. Or for example the classic line from Dune 2 "enemy units approaching" it's present too.

  On 3/31/2018 at 3:14 PM, Runtowin said:

Yes, so that player wont get bored waiting for their army to come out. I want the mission to be intense to the very end.

Expand  

Even withouth enemys there is always something to do: moving that harverster, reparing the damaged vehicles, placing some missing/destroyed buildings, checking how many harverster/carryalls I have, giving a look at the enemy base and looking the amount of units/turrets there are, more mining areas for me or for the enemy to exploit...

In yours I build random most the time, it's too frenetic.

By the way; Maybe you consider giving your ally (talking mission 7) the harversters in a differents moments. You give him like 6 harversters or more, but the problem it's the AI, when he builds his first Ref all the harvs will going to that spot. Doesn't matter if later he build extra refs, the harvs still will going to the first one (and they were so many that the haversters were blocking one another). But maybe it's intended.

  On 3/31/2018 at 3:14 PM, Runtowin said:

Once you get used to that, you will find competitive multiplayer quite similar.

Expand  

That's the reason I don't like playing like that. Just playing at max speed where I have no clue what I am doing and just placing 4 different type of buildings because those are the best or just the others are useless and building 2 type of units at most to win. I prefert building everything at 100% and take the big-insane-ultra-powerfull prebuilded base the AI have and I need to figure how to take with my currents weapons.

Heh, even on my own campaigns I usually kill the infantry by shooting, not by crushing over them.

  On 3/31/2018 at 3:14 PM, Runtowin said:

Haha, you're really lucky there. That base will be nasty if you left it alone.

Expand  

With the multiple enemies and the massive armys they have; I'll was going to do things very slowly, but in case that happens when I am in the middle of an attack I'll probably load a previous save :P (except if the attack was sucessfull, like destroying the whole base or being almost destroyed, in this case I'll continue and adapt to the new situation).

Final edit:
Aaaand, I finish the map. Another hour and a half for a total of 2 hours and 30 minutes.
After killing 1500 enemy units plus near 500 from Ordos (which were useless the last hour of gameplay) took 2000 looses to the enemy to finally being fully defeated.

What can I say. A very good final mission for a though campaign and... wait, what do you put there?

  On 3/19/2018 at 10:34 AM, Runtowin said:

The campaign features:

  • 25+ missions.
Expand  

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo T_T.
When more missions will be released I'll play them on easy, not even third of this campaign and several the missions already take me 1 hour to win.

A final suggestion. Remove the mission fail on the MCV; you can make a warning on screen "don't deploy that thing or you will explode" so if the player actually try to use it, you loose (a well deserved loose). But I was doing lots of stuff and a somepoint the game said "mission failed" and I was "what?.

As soon as I reloaded the map I saw I clicked on accident on the MCV icon instead the tank.

Maybe it's intended and by now you are laughing: "ha ha, that idiot missclick the MCV, what a looser, in fact, literally: mission failed! muahahahahaha". But I'll prefer to not loose my progress just because a miss click. I mean, I didn't "died", or "let my ally died" or "deployed something" or "destroyed a building I need to capture", which need premeditation and it's my fault, but loosing because that it's like a punch. Good thing I save often, but imagine if I loose 15-20 minutes (from the already 2:30 hours) of game because I clicked on a wrong icon.

Edited by Cm_blast
Posted
  Reveal hidden contents

 

Posted
  On 4/1/2018 at 1:20 AM, Runtowin said:

My army in my campaign is mixed when testing. Raider for scouting + jebaiting, quad for taking down turret/missile tank, combat tank for tank, etc.

Expand  

In my case everytime I trying to use X to counter Y, the enemy it's already sending another wave and the only thing I can do it's group, pressing "g" and hope for the best (Because my ally it's under attack, my harverster it's under attack, my base it's under attack, I suffered a heart attack...).

  On 4/1/2018 at 1:20 AM, Runtowin said:

Yep, I notice this in testing but haven't make a solution yet. Even if you drop it in different time, they will run into their nearest refinery.

Expand  

I found that the position on the map will depend on the refinery. For example, I have a map with 1 refinery at the top AI base, another at the bottom, and the harversters start harversting the nearest area but then both goes to the same refinery (don't  remember if it was top or bottom), and moving the initial harverster position a few squares (so now all the harversters at the bottom of the nearest ref, before 1 was on top) and now goes to the one it's suppose to.

I don't remember right now if I did exactly that, but sometimes just depending if the harverster it's to the right, left, top or bottom of the refinery will change which one choose as the default to unload the spice.

For a AI practice type of map I have no idea, I not use too often those type of AI.

  On 4/1/2018 at 1:20 AM, Runtowin said:

It's not my place to say this, I think you're being too careful there. You can do both just fine (I do that a lot in my test run).

Expand  

I don't thing so. I "loose" when the spacing guild send the big army against me (I loaded the save, retreated a bit so he focused the Ordos instead). Well, I exactly didn't loose, but the north part was going to fall and I was just starting to build more refs.

All the army I had prepared for an attack was used to take out those expantion bases. I didn't give him time to do something but I still have a good amount of looses. I don't want to imagine if I need to fight 4 enemies at once.

  On 4/1/2018 at 1:20 AM, Runtowin said:

For the record, in my 3 test run of current version, it took me an average of ~66min.

Expand  

Playing the game at what speed? the maximun possible?

  On 4/1/2018 at 1:20 AM, Runtowin said:

Well, I'm afraid that when I tuned it down, a certain somebody will complain about how easy it is, and beat the mission before the timer.

I will nerf AI in those missions anyway. Thanks for your feedback. Like I said, I have no idea where the best balance is, since I don't have any other testers.

At least, I can add "20+ hours of gameplay" in campaign description. Haha

Expand  

I know. This it's going to happen always.

Some people find X campaign or map hard or impossible, and then you saw a video from X guy beating the game in much less time that I do.

But still. I'll continue playing (future maps) in easy. That will cut more than a half of the enemy reinforcements but I still can see things here or there. That's why "easy" was made for.

  On 4/1/2018 at 1:20 AM, Runtowin said:

I understand that feeling, because I misclick often myself. I'll see what I can do, Some missions don't have enough space.

Expand  

This one you have slots enough. It's not the first time someone use the "build a VCM, lost the game"; I usually try to just set the CY condition; you still can use the MCV as a distraction or a heavy-armored tank with no weapon to drag aggro xD.


By the way, I am spying your map and I can see some values on the unit build priority using decimals, a trooper with 1,100, the trike with 1,300. I don't know how the AI works with decimal numbers (Except the 0,010 used for the eenginer by the practice AI), but I can guess using decimals you are setting which unit it's builded first before getting the 1:1 proportion or something like that?

Posted
  On 4/1/2018 at 2:02 AM, Cm_blast said:

In my case everytime I trying to use X to counter Y, the enemy it's already sending another wave and the only thing I can do it's group, pressing "g" and hope for the best (Because my ally it's under attack, my harverster it's under attack, my base it's under attack, I suffered a heart attack...).

Expand  

Lol. I have a group at my base, a small group at my flank, a small group at my ally's base, and switch to them if I heard "under attack".

 

  On 4/1/2018 at 2:02 AM, Cm_blast said:

For a AI practice type of map I have no idea, I not use too often those type of AI.

Expand  

I have a feeling that Starpost delivery will work. I'll try it out later.

 

  On 4/1/2018 at 2:02 AM, Cm_blast said:

Playing the game at what speed? the maximun possible?

Expand  

Normal speed. I have an in-game timer on for testing. I think they're 1:1, not sure what with max speed.

 

  On 4/1/2018 at 2:02 AM, Cm_blast said:

Some people find X campaign or map hard or impossible, and then you saw a video from X guy beating the game in much less time that I do.

Expand  

TFW I see a speed run video. Speaking of which, I don't see any Dune2000 speed run video.

 

  On 4/1/2018 at 2:02 AM, Cm_blast said:

I usually try to just set the CY condition; you still can use the MCV as a distraction or a heavy-armored tank with no weapon to drag aggro xD.

Expand  

Ah, an alternative to my harvester strats! Will try it out in Fey's campaign.

 

  On 4/1/2018 at 2:02 AM, Cm_blast said:

By the way, I am spying your map and I can see some values on the unit build priority using decimals, a trooper with 1,100, the trike with 1,300. I don't know how the AI works with decimal numbers (Except the 0,010 used for the eenginer by the practice AI), but I can guess using decimals you are setting which unit it's builded first before getting the 1:1 proportion or something like that?

Expand  

I think it works similar to BuildPriority, sorted in decreasing order when divided by the number of units. For example, a unit (A) with build priority 2, and one (B) with 0.55 will be built with the following order:

A A A B A

Because,

First A: 2/1 = 2

Second A: 2/2 = 1

Third A: 2/3 = 0.6666

Fourth A: 2/4 = 0.5

First B: 0.55/1 = 0.55

Fifth A: 2/5 = 0.4

etc

So decimal doesn't matter. There might be rounding error, but it is not game-breaking.

Posted (edited)
  On 4/1/2018 at 2:31 AM, Runtowin said:

Lol. I have a group at my base, a small group at my flank, a small group at my ally's base, and switch to them if I heard "under attack".

Expand  

And while I am paying attention to group 1, group 2 it's being decimated by enemy missile launchers with a greater range or my combat tanks (in guard mode) are figthing devastators 1 by 1 instead focusing the fire, but I can't paid attention to both; , once I already lost the Ordos (they started selling all the buildings), and at that point I was trying to open an attack at bottom while enemies were coming at top and spacing guild destroying Ordos harversters, I think.

  On 4/1/2018 at 2:31 AM, Runtowin said:

Normal speed. I have an in-game timer on for testing. I think they're 1:1, not sure what with max speed.

Expand  

Well I call normal speed I mean "real time" speed. 20 minutes in game are 20 minutes in real life. I think in the online C&C.net (dune 2000 one) it's the 6 out of 7.
Anyway, you are much more skilled than me, that's for sure.

  On 4/1/2018 at 2:31 AM, Runtowin said:

TFW I see a speed run video. Speaking of which, I don't see any Dune2000 speed run video.

Expand  

I think there are for Red Alert 2 and the final mission on Dune Emperor.

  On 4/1/2018 at 2:31 AM, Runtowin said:

I think it works similar to BuildPriority, sorted in decreasing order when divided by the number of units. For example, a unit (A) with build priority 2, and one (B) with 0.55 will be built with the following order:

Expand  

Works similar, but not the same. A building set to 0,010 will be builded the last, but if you give a unit the 0,010 will build the unit the first of all, but only 1 of that unit. The AI practice default do this, and he rush a new eengineer as soon as the available die.

I just trying your example with infantry A and trooper B and yes, it's a 4:1 proportion, but the trooper got trained the first, and of course, after 5 units were out, unit number 6 were another trooper. So it's a bit tricky. 

So maybe the decimals have more purpose that it seems. making a "enemy base with low unit production, go inside and do stuff" to choose with decimals what units it's builded first, then second, etc... even if a the end it's just a 1:1 proportion. Having an enemy base which first unit it's a combat tank, or a devastator first (by default I think he builds the infantry first), that can make doing stuff inside a base much harder, even if the emergency build it's really low.

Edited by Cm_blast
Posted (edited)
  On 4/1/2018 at 3:09 AM, Cm_blast said:

Works similar, but not the same. A building set to 0,010 will be builded the last, but if you give a unit the 0,010 will build the unit the first of all, but only 1 of that unit. The AI practice default do this, and he rush a new eengineer as soon as the available die.

I just trying your example with infantry A and trooper B and yes, it's a 4:1 proportion, but the trooper got trained the first, and of course, after 5 units were out, unit number 6 were another trooper. So it's a bit tricky. 

So maybe the decimals have more purpose that it seems. making a "enemy base with low unit production, go inside and do stuff" to choose with decimals what units it's builded first, then second, etc... even if a the end it's just a 1:1 proportion. Having an enemy base which first unit it's a combat tank, or a devastator first (by default I think he builds the infantry first), that can make doing stuff inside a base much harder, even if the emergency build it's really low.

Expand  

The only possible calculation I can think of is:

B: 1/0.55 = 1.818

A: 1/2 = 0.5

A: 2/1 = 2

A: 2/2 = 1

A: 2/3 = 0.6666

B: 0.55/1 = 0.55

 

In other word, for only the first unit, they take the inverse of build priority. Then the rest of them just follows the formula but minus one. If this is true, it would explain why engineer always come first for practice AI.

Edited by Runtowin
Posted
  On 3/30/2018 at 3:48 PM, Runtowin said:

Yes. One of my mission (currently) has that feature.

I already planned the settings of the next 4 missions (8-->11). You can expect more of that.

Expand  

Thanks for that, I 've tried Mission 1-6 in hard difficulty, feeling like you could never do something wrong otherwise you lost.(especially mission 4, I played like 20 times to make it). I'm very looking forward to playing ur next 4 missions, have a good day. :D

My Dune 2000 Youtube Gameplay Videos' Channel

Posted

Re-played! Let's see how the updates panned out.

My comments and criticisms are in a little different format this time but hopefully they get the point across.

M1V1:

  Reveal hidden contents

M2V1:

  Reveal hidden contents

M3V1:

  Reveal hidden contents

M4V1:

  Reveal hidden contents

M5V1:

  Reveal hidden contents

M6V1:

  Reveal hidden contents

M7V1:

  Reveal hidden contents

That should be everything. Hope that helps, man! I look forward to new updates and new missions. :)

Posted
  Reveal hidden contents

 

M2:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

M3V1:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

M4:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

M5:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

M6:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

M7:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 5/15/2018 at 8:50 AM, Fey said:

Man, the Ordos are a load of jerks.

Expand  

The Ordos saga hasn't ended yet in my campaign. I believe they're way worse than the Harkonnen, and I'll expose that more in my later campaign.

 

Thanks a lot, Fey. You set up a new standard of feedback! I like how extremely detailed it is.

 

Posted
  On 5/15/2018 at 2:08 PM, Runtowin said:
  Reveal hidden contents

M2:

  Reveal hidden contents

M3V1:

  Reveal hidden contents

M4:

  Reveal hidden contents

M5:

  Reveal hidden contents

M6:

  Reveal hidden contents

M7:

  Reveal hidden contents

The Ordos saga hasn't ended yet in my campaign. I believe they're way worse than the Harkonnen, and I'll expose that more in my later campaign.

Thanks a lot, Fey. You set up a new standard of feedback! I like how extremely detailed it is.

Expand  

M1:

  Reveal hidden contents

M2:

  Reveal hidden contents

M3:

  Reveal hidden contents

M4:

  Reveal hidden contents

M5:

  Reveal hidden contents

M6:

  Reveal hidden contents

M7:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

  On 5/15/2018 at 2:08 PM, Runtowin said:

The Ordos saga hasn't ended yet in my campaign. I believe they're way worse than the Harkonnen, and I'll expose that more in my later campaign.

Thanks a lot, Fey. You set up a new standard of feedback! I like how extremely detailed it is.

Expand  

That'll be fun. They are manipulative, deceitful, treacherous... maybe Westwood put it best when they said insidious. The Harkonnen may seem more evil outright, but the Ordos' insidious tactics are probably the most haunting.

No problem! Sorry about the really harsh criticism on M7, but I reeeeally didn't like those reinforcements in the rear. XD

  • 3 years later...
Posted
  On 3/19/2018 at 10:34 AM, Runtowin said:

My first campaign. Still WIP. But here we go.

 

The plot:

The campaign takes place in a what-if scenario where 3 Great House failed to kill the padishah emperor in "WOA: SS" campaign by aKaFedaYkin. The combined army of Spacing Guild and House Corrino launched a counter-offensive against all 3 great houses. The result is devastated.

House Ordos simulated their eventual destruction against the Emperor. They decided to booby trap their building, and hid the rest of the army somewhere in Arrakis, using their Stealth Technology. House Ordos raids Emperor/Spacing Guild's mining facility almost everyday and send intel to their allies. They calculate that this is the best way to profit from the situation.

Baron Harkonnen's was KIA during a battle against Sardaukar. This created a power vacuum between Copec Harkonnen and Gunseng Harkonnen. Copec allies himself with the Emperor, refusing to work with their eternal enemy, Atreides. While Gunseng reject the traitorous emperor, believing that Copec is being used by him, and will be disposed later.

House Atreides is the main target of the Emperor's offensive operation. Shaddam IV thinks that house Atreides is the biggest problem and need to destroyed first. However, to keep house Harkonnen and house Ordos at bay, he supplies weapons and tanks to Copec, so that he could fight his brother, and deploy search party for Ordos's outpost. Much to smuggler's dismay, he also claim all spice as his, and require his permission to harvest, no need to say that the price for such paper is absurd. Anyone who doesn't have his permission is permanently retired.

Spacing Guild refuses all transportation between Arrakis and 3 homeworld of house Harkonnen, Atreides, and Ordos, they profit from harvesting spice under Emperor's protection.

A few concerned noble house of Landsraad fears the rising power of house Corrino and Spacing Guild. They fear the combination of space travel monopoly, spice monopoly, and Sardaukar would allow Shaddam IV to swallow up the Landsraad. They contract you, a renowned leader of now-disbanded mercenary group to prevent such future. They will transfer a huge amount of money to your bank to get you started, because any other methods might reveal their involvement in Arrakis' affair.

After signing the contract, you contact Jim, your previous right hand man, to bring you and your newly-formed mercenary group to Arrakis. Jim, actually his codename, while looking unreliable, but is pretty ruthless and capable during his time as mercenary. He joined the smuggler's guild shortly after the group's disbandment, seeking the thrill of battle. He climbed rank rapidly, and now he is the leader of smuggler guild's branch in Arrakis.

With that, start your story in the desert planet of Dune.

 

The campaign features:

  • 25+ missions.
  • Twist. Everyone loves plot twist.
  • Often rich in money, but low tech.
  • Unique objective.
  • Multiple ways to complete objective.

 

Progress:

  • Mission 1-4: Done. Re-balancing.
  • Mission 5: Done. Re-balancing.
  • Mission 6: Done. Re-balancing.
  • Mission 7: Done. Re-balancing.
  • Mission 8: Testing.
  • Mission 9: Scripting.
  • Mission 10: Mapping.
  • Mission 11: Scripting.
  • Mission 12: Mapping.

 

Download:

Merc - FOE v1.1.rar 152.64 kB · 126 downloads

How to install:

  1. Extract the contents to their respective folder in /data/ folder in your Dune 2000 installation.
  2. Ensure that you have the lastest version of Dune 2000, Mission Launcher, and "Tiledata.bin".
  3. Launch mission through mission launcher.

 

Changelog:

  • FOE v1.0 -> v1.1:
  Reveal hidden contents

Note:

I intend for these missions to be more difficult than original campaign. So play to your maximum capability.

The campaign is still work in progress, there might be additional changes to existing mission.

I greatly appreciate your feedbacks, possible bugs, bad English (English is not my native language), especially balancing concerns, as my skill is not that good, and I balance based on that.

Let me know if you found any cheese tactics as well.

Thanks for playing my campaign. I hope you have had a great time.

 

Expand  

Sry for this noob question: I downloaded it but and put it into dune 2000 carpet ( I use gruntmods edition ) and now i cant play them cause i can find them in mission launcher

Posted (edited)
  On 7/9/2021 at 11:00 PM, Adrian said:

Sry for this noob question: I downloaded it but and put it into dune 2000 carpet ( I use gruntmods edition ) and now i cant play them cause i can find them in mission launcher

Expand  

All the files need to be stored into "data/missions". If you open the "missions" folder and you see files like named "A1v1.map" and similar name (files there will be .map, .ini and .mis) then you know you are in the correct folder, and here is where every campaign needs to be stored, so you need to copy all the map/mis/ini files inside here. 

Remember, the launcher only have personal windows for a few campaigns, to play any of the other campaigns available (or that you download later) you need to go to the top-left windown:

image.png.e4962ac88e0f6808d16ae63d8b5a7435.png <--this one.

There it's just looking for the mercenaries submenu and searching for a few "fall of the Emperor" lines.

Edited by Cm_blast
Posted
  On 7/10/2021 at 11:12 AM, Cm_blast said:

All the files need to be stored into "data/missions". If you open the "missions" folder and you see files like named "A1v1.map" and similar name (files there will be .map, .ini and .mis) then you know you are in the correct folder, and here is where every campaign needs to be stored, so you need to copy all the map/mis/ini files inside here. 

Remember, the launcher only have personal windows for a few campaigns, to play any of the other campaigns available (or that you download later) you need to go to the top-left windown:

image.png.e4962ac88e0f6808d16ae63d8b5a7435.png <--this one.

There it's just looking for the mercenaries submenu and searching for a few "fall of the Emperor" lines.

Expand  

I understood 10% of your iinstructions, that is failure

So please can you send me images  or a small clip abput how to play them?

Because i don't know which ui data folder should i use

Please answer me, that is directive

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.