The President selector

[Edric O]

"America needs and deserves a President who will stand against the entrenched socialism..."

Hahahahahaha!!! ;D Now that is funny. "Entrenched socialism" in the world's most capitalist nation! Well, I suppose when you're as far right as these guys are, even Bush looks like some sort of "socialist". Lol.

"It is clear that both major parties are committed to the agenda of the New World Order..."

Wasn't it a global communist conspiracy? :D

Seriously speaking, though, some of the policies of the Constitution Party are even more reactionary than those advocated by your average fascists, in the sense that they literraly want to bring the United States right back to the 18th century.

They are somewhat funny precisely because of their insanity, but it certainly wouldn't be funny if they ever got hold of real political power.

[Edric O]

1.  Your ideal theoretical candidate.  (100%) 

2.  Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat  (72%) 

3.  Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat  (71%)

Strange. You got Kerry and Edwards as your top choices? I would have expected you to get Ralph Nader, since you've always supported him...

Together? That's like half of population in China and India should have bigger word?

Why not? Or are you saying that it's fair for a smaller population to dictate terms to a larger population? It is common sense (and standard practice in all federal countries) that the larger member states should have a bigger say than the smaller member states - the only issue of dispute is how much of a bigger say.

An empire ensuring personal liberties is better than pluralistic world under control of authoritative reigns.

Yes, but an empire ensuring personal liberties is an impossible empire. Conquerors do not build empires out of kindness or altruism - they build empires to satisfy their ambition, and to take something (land, natural resources, manpower, etc.) from the countries they conquer.

Fighting a war of conquest for the good of the conquered populations is an utterly absurd idea.

OFF TOPIC: Edric, who would you vote over herein our pastoral plains? ;)

You mean in our own Romanian elections? I'll vote for PAS (Partidul Alianta Socialista) for Parliament. They most likely won't get any seats, of course, and I don't agree with their policies more than 50% anyway, but I have no better option. As for the Presidential elections, I'm leaning towards Basescu, but only by the slightest margin.

[Caid Ivik]

I don't want fairness when consulting with countries like China. They don't take us as equals, not even as something else than potential enemies. Simply if China would take over new UN Empire with its two billion people and then start their shining fascist rule over us, european barbars, then we would quickly abandon this dictatorship of quantity. But it's thing of personal opinion, I like more  when state cares only for my security and in most places it leaves me initiative, tough it ends in chaos as we live in today, that's the euroamerican style. You think about state as a garance of equal wealth and solidarity, even if it would mean restrictions in some liberties.

About your second quote, there are cases of Alexander of Macedonia, Mojmir or allies during the WW2, which had such target. Tribal lords like Chlodovik, Samo, Arpad or Temudjin, which were conquering other tribes for common good of whole nation, are the cause of nations' definition itself, we can say.

[ordos45]

1.  Your ideal theoretical candidate.  (100%)  Click here for info

2.  Cobb, David - Green Party  (80%)  Click here for info

3.  Nader, Ralph - Independent  (76%)  Click here for info

4.  Brown, Walt - Socialist Party  (76%)  Click here for info

5.  Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat  (56%)  Click here for info

6.  Badnarik, Michael - Libertarian  (32%)  Click here for info

7.  Peroutka, Michael - Constitution Party  (29%)  Click here for info

8.  Bush, President George W. - Republican  (28%)  Click here for info

Why am I not surprised that much?  I honestly thought Peroutka would be last on my list.  I am surprised the Indpendents, Greens, and Socialists came within 4% of each other.

[Dude_Doc]

I don't want fairness when consulting with countries like China. They don't take us as equals, not even as something else than potential enemies.

China is not the enemy. As soon as China abandoned the command economy and adopted the market economy, they quickly became our friends. And since then, China has become a thriving home for the corporations. I mean, it's the perfect place. No democracy, no public marches nor any socialists, that's how the corporations want the world to look like.

That's how the world will look like if the US have their way.

I meant that the world should have the UN, as it does now, and that decisions that people make ends up there. That is, the people of each country vote for or against, the results are represented by the president of each country. After this, the presidents vote for or against a decision in the council.

I mean, you wouldn't like if Sweden decided what your country would be like, right?

[thomas]

1.  Your ideal theoretical candidate.  (100%)  Click here for info

2.  Dean, Gov. Howard, VT - Democrat  (72%)  Click here for info

3.  Sharpton, Reverend Al - Democrat  (70%)  Click here for info

4.  Clark, Retired General Wesley K., AR - Democrat  (70%)  Click here for info

5.  Cobb, David - Green Party  (70%)  Click here for info

6.  Nader, Ralph - Independent  (70%)  Click here for info

7.  Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol, IL - Democrat  (68%)  Click here for info

8.  Kucinich, Rep. Dennis, OH - Democrat  (68%)  Click here for info

9.  Brown, Walt - Socialist Party  (66%)  Click here for info

10.  Kerry, Senator John, MA - Democrat  (66%)  Click here for info

11.  Edwards, Senator John, NC - Democrat  (65%)  Click here for info

12.  Gephardt, Rep. Dick, MO - Democrat  (53%)  Click here for info

13.  Lieberman, Senator Joe, CT - Democrat  (51%)  Click here for info

14.  Badnarik, Michael - Libertarian  (44%)  Click here for info

15.  LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. - Democrat  (40%)  Click here for info

16.  Bush, President George W. - Republican  (22%)  Click here for info

17.  Peroutka, Michael - Constitution Party  (21%)  Click here for info

18.  Hagelin, Dr. John - Natural Law  (13%)  Click here for info

I knew it, I'm always saying dean should have been the offical DNC candidate rahter than kerry