Acriku Posted May 9, 2003 Share Posted May 9, 2003 Ripskar, I am a man of science. I consider things to be true or not when evidence is given, and until then I use my personal opinion on it (what else do I have on it?). I find Zeus and the possibility of his existence rediculous, but I find it very interesting, and the stories from Virgil to Ovid to be fantastic. I read The Aeneid and Metamorphoses, both great books. But I do not consider the truth of them because there is no evidence to use to consider its truth. If evidence is given, I analyze the evidence and find whether or not its conclusive. Etc. It's not just a "it sounds so stupid and must be false!", I'm not that closed-minded. I may consider its truth if it is interesting, although. Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time with every poppycock "guess" at what is going on, or what happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.