Reincarnation

[Acriku]

Ripskar, I am a man of science. I consider things to be true or not when evidence is given, and until then I use my personal opinion on it (what else do I have on it?). I find Zeus and the possibility of his existence rediculous, but I find it very interesting, and the stories from Virgil to Ovid to be fantastic. I read The Aeneid and Metamorphoses, both great books. But I do not consider the truth of them because there is no evidence to use to consider its truth. If evidence is given, I analyze the evidence and find whether or not its conclusive. Etc. It's not just a "it sounds so stupid and must be false!", I'm not that closed-minded.

I may consider its truth if it is interesting, although. Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time with every poppycock "guess" at what is going on, or what happened.